15:04:20 <witek> #startmeeting monasca
15:04:21 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 31 15:04:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is witek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:04:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:04:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:04:46 <witek> Hello everyone
15:04:53 <fouadben> Hi all,
15:04:57 <cbellucci> hello
15:05:01 <haruki> hello
15:05:07 <jgr> Hello
15:05:38 <witek> #topic stable/queens
15:05:50 <witek> I would like to cut stable branches soon
15:06:07 <witek> please let me know of reviews that should be merged before
15:06:32 <witek> I definitely would like to get tempest-plugin cleanup merged
15:06:47 <jgr> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533833/ would be a candidate, too.
15:06:52 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/530456
15:07:14 <witek> jgr: yes
15:08:24 <witek> hi jgu_, just have been talking about you :)
15:08:35 <jgu> witek: morning
15:08:43 <jgr> About https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533833/ to be precise :-)
15:09:22 <witek> is probably ready to go, right?
15:09:29 <jgu> yes :-)
15:09:31 <jgr> (I assumed you'd want that in stable/queens to and thus brought it up when witek asked about things we want in stable/queens)
15:09:57 <jgu> jgr: yes, stable/queens please :-)
15:10:52 <witek> any other changes?
15:10:53 <jgr> witek: On a related note: could we theoretically backport https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533833/ to stable/pike as well?
15:11:15 <witek> we don't have cassandra in pike
15:11:46 <jgr> Well, monasca-api supports it already (at least it's got a schema and everything in stable/pike)
15:12:03 <jgu> right, I have another one that preferred to include in stable/queens. : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538096/
15:12:16 <jgr> Just that authentication patch is missing - but if you prefer we can pull than in via rpm-packaging on our side.
15:12:50 <jgu> jgr: the cassandra schema in pike was from the previous try on cassandra way back
15:13:28 <jgu> jgr: I have backported the api auth in the our github repo
15:13:31 <witek> jgu: would it make sense to cherry-pick this change?
15:13:58 <jgr> jgu: I know. But that isn't in the package, yet :-)
15:15:02 <jgu> witek: I don't see it makes sense to back port https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533833 to stable/pike without https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533833
15:15:28 <jgu> i meant without https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/monasca-common+branch:stable/pike+topic:cassandra_backport_pike
15:15:41 <jgu> which we decided not to do
15:15:49 <witek> OK, so we don't back-port
15:16:09 <jgr> Ah. That's the puzzle piece I was missing. Sorry for causing this confusion.
15:16:22 <jgu> jgr: no problem, jgr
15:16:35 <jgu> but I do want to see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538096/ in queens.
15:16:36 <jgr> (I already had a patched java-monasca-comman when messing with this locally)
15:16:47 <jgu> the detention in plugin for cassandra
15:17:00 <witek> left minor comments on it today
15:18:07 <jgu> yes. I debated back and forth whether to leave the two directory paths as default or not. at the end, I decided to let the user to choose whether they want to monitor both directory or not.
15:19:42 <witek> OK with me
15:19:59 <witek> #topic PTG planning
15:20:14 <witek> I have added one item
15:20:33 <witek> to agenda
15:20:41 <witek> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-ptg-rocky
15:20:50 <witek> Create Docker images from from OpenStack repos
15:20:56 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/538937
15:21:26 <witek> Dobroslaw has pushed the first version of the spec for it
15:22:33 <witek> it would be good to start collecting more information on items we want to discuss
15:22:59 <witek> jgr: has already the spec for Service Domain
15:23:19 <witek> the spec is actually still not merged
15:24:00 <witek> I can start collecting some requirements for new monasca-thresh
15:25:16 <jgu> do you want us to add the spec drafts to specs/queens/?
15:25:44 <witek> specs/rocky would be accurate
15:26:00 <jgu> I was wondering about that :-)
15:26:15 <witek> and we probably don't need specs for everything
15:27:06 <witek> jgu: persister is your item, I reckon?
15:27:54 <witek> do you consider Go implementation because of better performance?
15:29:22 <jgu> yes, as a plan B only if python perf can't be tuned to a satisfactory level.
15:30:37 <witek> if you have some more info on this, you could probably put it at the bottom of PTG etherpad
15:31:38 <jgu> sure, I'll add when more data becomes available
15:31:55 <witek> for monasca-transform I though if we could evaluate and discuss the replacement with monasca-aggregator
15:32:29 <witek> I think at this point, also etherpad would be good
15:33:13 <witek> do we want to plan one session to work together on docs?
15:34:33 <witek> no response, everyone loves documentation :)
15:35:52 <witek> metric retention - jgu, I guess you've got clear vision about it
15:37:04 <jgu> I have some very rough ideas about the retention that I can throw into a spec.
15:37:43 <witek> that would be great
15:38:06 <witek> I think it needs some good planing
15:38:41 <witek> rbrndt: I've seen you joined
15:38:55 <rbrndt> yes, hello
15:38:59 <witek> Dobroslaw has added spec for building docker images
15:39:09 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/538937
15:40:20 <witek> it's first version
15:40:31 <witek> but review from your team would be very welcome
15:40:51 <rbrndt> ok, i'll take a look and pass it along
15:41:11 <witek> thanks
15:41:58 <witek> do we have any other topics for today?
15:42:04 <yuan> Hi witek, our Monasca based monitoring system is going to production in Croatia at the end of this February. We made a lot of customizations and IPv6 bug fixing
15:42:28 <witek> hi yuan
15:42:32 <witek> that's great
15:42:39 <yuan> This is from German Telecom
15:42:51 <witek> sounds like a perfect topic for Vancouver
15:43:35 <yuan> I am wondering who should I contact to port our changes into the Monasca?
15:44:28 <yuan> Because I am out of this for awhile, I also like to know more about the current project status
15:44:47 <yuan> Is Roland still in?
15:45:51 <witek> sorry, I've been looking for our Contribution Guide
15:46:16 <witek> the process is to submit a feature request in StoryBoard
15:46:27 <witek> https://storyboard.openstack.org
15:46:41 <witek> you can also bring the topics up in this meeting
15:47:01 <yuan> Thanks. Should I be included in some kind of monasca mailing list?
15:47:27 <witek> right, I've seen your email on launchpad mailing list
15:47:38 <witek> we haven't used that for a while
15:48:05 <witek> we use the openstack-dev mailing list
15:48:10 <yuan> I checked openstack-dev mailing list. It is too much. If I can be included in any monasca related group dev list, it will be greate
15:48:21 <witek> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
15:48:53 <yuan> Can I filter the list by topic like Monasca?
15:49:06 <witek> you can edit your subscription options
15:49:14 <witek> to filter only [monasca] tag
15:49:17 <witek> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openstack-dev
15:50:26 <yuan> Ok, will see. Thanks. I don't want to block anybody for this meeting. Can I ask the Cassandra status in this project?
15:50:54 <yuan> We use both mysql and Cassandra
15:51:22 <witek> how big is your deployment?
15:51:48 <witek> Cassandra support has been added in this release
15:52:40 <witek> Java implementation will be added in SUSE OpenStack
15:52:58 <witek> Java persister, to be strict
15:53:19 <haruki> witek: Sorry to interrupt you, but please let me know.
15:53:41 <haruki> Please share the following 2 info about PTG in Devlin.
15:54:08 <haruki> 1. Time schedule of Monasca in UTC (Bacause I'm Japanese guy and can't travel in Devlin for PTG)
15:54:15 <yuan> We have 2000 customers for now. We have 4 sites
15:54:31 <haruki> 2. How to join the meeting in "NOT" F2F?)
15:55:09 <witek> haruki: I'll add info to the etherpad
15:55:35 <haruki> Thank you, I check it.
15:55:57 <jgu> yuan: which release are you on?
15:57:08 <cbellucci> yuan: as witek suggested, are you interested in presenting this success story during the next OpenStack summit?
15:57:40 <yuan> When would be the meeting?
15:57:52 <witek> end of May
15:58:12 <witek> deadline for presentation submissions is Feb. 8
15:58:43 <yuan> Well, it is too close, may be next one
15:59:21 <yuan> We are still very busy for bug fixing and performance tuning for production
15:59:27 <witek> yuan: thanks for reaching out
16:00:04 <witek> please contact us per mailing-list or IRC
16:00:05 <yuan> Thanks Monasca and community
16:00:10 <cbellucci> sure, and if it is a European story, then the summit in November in Berlin sounds even better
16:00:17 <witek> you can also drop me an email
16:00:25 <yuan> I will do it.
16:00:50 <witek> have to close now
16:00:54 <witek> thank you everyone
16:00:55 <yuan> Bye
16:01:00 <cbellucci> bye
16:01:14 <witek> #endmeeting