15:00:40 <witek_> #startmeeting monasca
15:00:41 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 13 15:00:40 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is witek_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:42 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:45 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:00:57 <chaconpiza> Hi all
15:00:58 <witek_> the agenda as usual:
15:01:02 <witek_> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:01:19 <witek_> please add items, if you have some
15:01:29 <witek_> hi chaconpiza
15:01:34 <brtknr> o/
15:01:40 <witek_> hi brtknr
15:01:46 <witek_> nice attendance today
15:02:09 <witek_> #topic new board for Ussuri
15:02:18 <witek_> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/190
15:02:30 <witek_> I've started adding tasks to the new board
15:02:46 <witek_> idea is to track all important changes here
15:03:14 <witek_> so that we have an overview which task to take next, or where to spend time on reviews
15:03:33 <witek_> please help adding the tasks
15:03:49 <witek_> or stories
15:04:21 <brtknr> Nice!
15:05:13 <witek_> #topic New meeting time
15:05:42 <witek_> unfortunately the current meeting time won't work for me in the next weeks
15:06:06 <witek_> so wanted to ask if we could change the meeting time
15:06:34 <brtknr> sure, please suggest an altertive
15:06:42 <brtknr> sure, please suggest an alternative
15:06:54 <chaconpiza> right
15:07:08 <witek_> I think setting up a doodle would be best, do you have some preferences on time slots?
15:07:55 <brtknr> non-sleeping hours is preferred
15:07:59 <chaconpiza> what about 13:00 UTC ?
15:08:00 <witek_> :)
15:08:17 <Dobroslaw> No preference for now, maybe earlier?
15:08:38 <Dobroslaw> Oh, right, depend on who we have attending
15:08:59 <brtknr> would prefer 10:00-12:00 UTC
15:09:26 <witek_> have to check with joadavis as well
15:09:57 <witek_> thanks for suggestions, I'll set up a doodle and send to the mailing list + IRC
15:10:18 <witek_> and we can decide based on results next week
15:10:47 <witek_> #topic reviews
15:11:25 <witek_> I've listed some reviews we've worked on in the last time
15:11:52 <witek_> we have 2 InfluxDB related changes:
15:12:01 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/689712
15:12:12 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/692359
15:13:30 <brtknr> automatic db creation and default_retention_hours
15:14:52 <witek_> then one in API, adding control on the number of messages sent in a batch to Kafka
15:14:57 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/667931
15:15:34 <witek_> maintenance change in events API
15:15:40 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/674204
15:15:47 <dougsz> thanks for the review on 667931  - will update later
15:16:57 <witek_> thanks dougsz, the only thing missing from my perspective is the release note
15:17:03 <witek_> config option rename is a nit
15:17:53 <witek_> then we have a big change configuring the merged metrics and logs API in devstack plugin
15:18:05 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/672263
15:18:36 <witek_> it also sets up the corresponding CI job
15:19:17 <witek_> by the way, any ideas why the logs job is having problems?
15:19:30 <witek_> I cannot reproduce that issue in my env
15:19:48 <dougsz> need to investigate on at least one of my patches
15:19:58 <Dobroslaw> adriancz is kindly asking for more pairs of eyes to review his change :-)
15:21:45 <witek_> I've been stacking it up yesterday and found small issues, but works in general
15:22:14 <witek_> #topic periodic notifications
15:23:06 <witek_> dougsz: I guess it's yours?
15:23:18 <dougsz> ah yes - we had a customer wanting to use these
15:23:44 <dougsz> First of all, with Oslo Config, there are some issues which prevent the existing functionality working
15:24:28 <dougsz> And secondly, we had a request for allowing all notifications types support periodic notifications
15:25:56 <dougsz> There is an argument for reducing alert fatigue, and not using them, but in some cases it could be useful
15:26:41 <witek_> agree, and the user has control where to use them
15:27:38 <dougsz> If we think it's acceptable to allow these periodic notifications for all types, all that remains is to update tempest tests
15:28:35 <witek_> I think it was the original plan, to make it available for all notification types
15:28:59 <dougsz> Cool, it actually makes things simpler not having all the 'is it a webhook' logic
15:29:08 <dougsz> https://github.com/openstack/monasca-notification/blob/master/monasca_notification/periodic_engine.py#L96
15:29:14 <witek_> will other periods be supported as well?
15:29:38 <dougsz> Yeah, my patches support arbitrary periods, providing you configure the services correctly
15:30:08 <dougsz> I think there may be a further issue with the blocking wait in the link above
15:30:17 <dougsz> But that can be another patch
15:30:28 <dougsz> That's all from me on this one
15:31:00 <witek_> thanks, see the cards in the Ussuri board already
15:31:04 <dougsz> :)
15:31:55 <witek_> do we have anything else for today?
15:33:12 <dougsz> Any interesting news from the summit?
15:33:15 <sum12> anything from the summit ?
15:33:33 <witek_> Summit was smaller again
15:34:09 <witek_> many Chinese participants, but not too many interactions unfortunately
15:34:38 <sum12> I heard there were live translations ?
15:34:51 <witek_> yes, but not in our sessions
15:35:13 <witek_> some sessions were complete in Chinese
15:36:11 <witek_> there was quite some interest around migrating from Telemetry to Monasca
15:36:32 <witek_> the background is that Gnocchi is unmaintained now
15:36:48 <witek_> https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/issues/1049
15:37:01 <sum12> yes the lead moved on to datadog
15:37:22 <witek_> good move
15:37:57 <witek_> also our publisher for Ceilometer has been accepted and merged
15:38:14 <sum12> that is good news
15:38:35 <witek_> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-system-architecture.html#supported-databases
15:39:40 <witek_> we talked with the guys from new Telemetry team
15:40:08 <witek_> they are mainly interested in maintaining their legacy deployments
15:40:12 <witek_> with MongoDB
15:41:23 <witek_> I talked with gmann about IPv6 support work
15:41:31 <witek_> he needs some help with it
15:41:42 <witek_> https://review.opendev.org/673274
15:43:12 <sum12> why MongoDB ?
15:43:24 <witek_> they use it
15:44:05 <witek_> as Ceilometer backend
15:45:01 <sum12> alright, I had heard they moved away from it long ago.
15:45:11 <sum12> I guess that was a rumor
15:45:53 <sum12> CERN and stackHPC were talking about Monasca during my last summit
15:46:21 <sum12> Any news there ?
15:46:31 <witek_> there were guys from CERN in the project update session
15:46:55 <sum12> cool
15:47:54 <witek_> in general our 3 presentations were nicely attended
15:48:07 <witek_> onboarding session was empty
15:48:29 <dougsz> 3 out of 4 isn't bad
15:48:45 <witek_> perhaps because it was part of the PTG now, and somewhat difficult to find
15:49:01 <witek_> it was not listed in the official schedule and app
15:49:45 <witek_> other projects had the same experience
15:50:28 <openstackgerrit> Bharat Kunwar proposed openstack/monasca-persister master: Support default_retention_hours for influxdb  https://review.opendev.org/689712
15:50:28 <chaconpiza> Did the ticket for the summit include the PTL sessions?
15:50:52 <witek_> yes, if I recall correctly
15:52:36 <witek_> OK, I think we're done for today
15:52:42 <witek_> thanks for joining
15:52:47 <dougsz> Thanks all, bye
15:52:56 <witek_> and see you next week, same time
15:52:58 <chaconpiza> thanks, bye
15:53:05 <sum12> bye
15:53:08 <witek_> #endmeeting