13:00:29 <chaconpiza> #startmeeting monasca
13:00:30 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug 25 13:00:29 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is chaconpiza. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:31 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:00:33 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
13:01:04 <chaconpiza> Hello everyone
13:01:13 <bandorf> hello
13:01:18 <chaconpiza> The agenda as usual https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
13:01:20 <witek> hi
13:01:31 <bandorf> Welcome back, witek!
13:01:59 <chaconpiza> Hi Matthias
13:02:01 <witek> welcome :)
13:02:16 <chaconpiza> Hi Witek, welcome back
13:03:06 <chaconpiza> Before to start with the agenda, a small summary of changes this past week:
13:03:50 <chaconpiza> A new version of monasca-agent was released for Ussuri
13:03:58 <chaconpiza> Monasca-Agent 3.0.2
13:04:32 <chaconpiza> - Fix a critical bug for Python 3 support in the http_check metric.
13:04:46 <chaconpiza> - Includes an update of Cinder-api versions to be monitored.
13:04:51 <chaconpiza> - Minor change in help text.
13:05:22 <chaconpiza> Done by bandorf
13:05:25 <chaconpiza> thanks.
13:06:03 <chaconpiza> We found an alarm definition that brakes Monasca-UI Alarm View (in Py3)
13:06:37 <chaconpiza> Investigated and fixed by piotrowskim https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746674/
13:06:48 <chaconpiza> thanks.
13:07:08 <chaconpiza> Let's start with the topics:
13:07:23 <chaconpiza> #topic Switch monasca-thresh to cycle-with-rc
13:08:17 <chaconpiza> Sean McGinnis proposed to changed the release model of monasca-thresh and monasca-ui to cycle-with-rc
13:08:32 <chaconpiza> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746193/
13:08:43 <chaconpiza> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746194/
13:09:25 <chaconpiza> I am not sure of the historical reasons why some modules have one release model (intermediate) and others the cycle-with-rc
13:10:01 <chaconpiza> witek, is there something to stops us to uniform the release model to all monasca projects to cycle-with-rc?
13:11:06 <witek> historically cycle-with-intermediary has offered more flexibility when to release
13:11:59 <witek> cycle-with-rc being forced by release team on deadlines
13:13:01 <witek> I think most of repositories could be switched to cycle-with-rc now
13:13:30 <witek> exception being Kibana plugin, which does not accept `rc` string in version number
13:14:11 <chaconpiza> I had the same feeling. Good to know about Monasca-Kibana-Plugin.
13:15:24 <chaconpiza> Sean had abandoned the reviews with the note they can be restored when decision is taken. I will after meeting go for the cycle with rc for those two mentioned projects.
13:15:27 <chaconpiza> thanks
13:15:59 <chaconpiza> #topic Remove deprecated YAML config - Docker part of monasca-notification
13:16:14 <chaconpiza> piotrowskim are you around?
13:16:18 <piotrowskim> yes
13:17:12 <piotrowskim> so, few weeks ago Doug and Witek was working on removing deprecated yaml configuraton for monasca-notification
13:17:18 <piotrowskim> link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656769/
13:17:48 <piotrowskim> Docker part left and I took that task
13:18:49 <piotrowskim> still some things to adjust, should be ready soon
13:19:13 <chaconpiza> thanks
13:19:37 <chaconpiza> #topic Zuul legacy jobs
13:20:30 <chaconpiza> this topic was brought by Luigi (tosky)
13:20:39 <tosky> yep
13:20:56 <chaconpiza> Hi Luigi
13:21:23 <tosky> hi! Do you need a brief summary from me?
13:21:44 <witek> I've sent a message to openstack-discuss about deprecating monasca-transform repository
13:21:49 <chaconpiza> yes please
13:22:31 <tosky> so yeah, the most important one is the job in monasca-transform; deprecating the repository will fix the issue
13:22:38 <tosky> but there is no much time left
13:22:49 <witek> what's the deadline?
13:23:09 <tosky> the other 3 jobs are legacy jobs but they don't depend on devstack-gate, so they are less urgent (but still nice to clean up)
13:24:09 <tosky> witek: not totally sure about the precise deprecation deadline, but I would say before branching victoria
13:24:10 <tosky> https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html
13:24:26 <tosky> which is soon enough
13:24:42 <witek> will deprecating the repo be enough? the master branch will be cleaned but stable branches stay in place
13:26:06 <tosky> from the point of view of the goal, victoria shouldn't have legacy jobs, so the deprecation should be enough
13:26:32 <tosky> because master will be cleaned, so no legacy jobs, and no legacy job in victoria because it won't be created
13:26:48 <witek> thanks, branching is around milestone 3, right?
13:28:44 <tosky> iirc client libraries branch on milestone 3, while the others a bit later (rc), but I always forget that part, I need to recheck
13:29:19 <tosky> yep, it should be release candidate
13:29:25 <witek> OK, we'll be ready with monasca-transform
13:29:33 <tosky> but as the process may take a while, the sooner is started, the better!
13:31:14 <chaconpiza> Thanks for the engagement Witek
13:31:36 <chaconpiza> #topic AOB
13:32:29 <chaconpiza> Is there any other topic we should discuss today?
13:33:14 <witek> not from me
13:33:26 <bandorf> not from me either
13:34:10 <chaconpiza> Then let's close here the meeting. Thanks for your attendance.
13:34:18 <witek> thanks everyone
13:34:29 <chaconpiza> See on this channel next week, bye.
13:34:36 <witek> next week I'm off again, see you in two weeks
13:34:36 <bandorf> Thanks, bye
13:34:53 <chaconpiza> #endmeeting