17:00:31 <serg_melikyan> #startmeeting Murano
17:00:35 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Nov 25 17:00:31 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is serg_melikyan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:36 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:39 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano'
17:00:45 <katyafervent2> hi!
17:00:49 <serg_melikyan> Hi!
17:01:20 <StanLagun> o/
17:01:26 <serg_melikyan> anyone else from Murano team? :)
17:02:01 <serg_melikyan> Let's start folks
17:02:39 <serg_melikyan> Our agenda today is a little bit short, looks like we don't have questions to discuss today except our Action Items Review
17:03:01 <serg_melikyan> Any last minute agenda changes?
17:03:52 <serg_melikyan> #topic Action Items Review
17:03:56 <katyafervent2> ee can discuss templete specs
17:04:11 <katyafervent2> *we
17:04:13 <serg_melikyan> katyafervent2: templete specs?
17:04:45 <katyafervent2> templete for the specification
17:05:55 <serg_melikyan> Ok
17:06:11 <serg_melikyan> StanLagun: first action item is on you
17:06:20 <serg_melikyan> stan_lagun will insure that tickets about issues with re-deployment will be created
17:06:35 <StanLagun> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1394104
17:06:37 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1394104 in murano "Redeploy of failed environment is not possible" [High,In progress]
17:06:44 <dteselkin> Hi
17:07:00 <StanLagun> Kate filled it and I think there is some progress on it already
17:07:27 <serg_melikyan> This is only thing missing to have proper redeployment?
17:08:13 <StanLagun> AFAIK yes. But we will examine it once again once this bug is fixed
17:08:20 <serg_melikyan> I see that katyafervent2 already proposed fix for that issue :)
17:08:36 <katyafervent2> yes, dashboard was the reason
17:08:45 <serg_melikyan> StanLagun, katyafervent2 thank you!
17:08:45 <katyafervent2> and fix is already on review
17:09:28 <serg_melikyan> #action StanLagun, re-examine re-deployment feature after #1394104 will be merged
17:11:18 <serg_melikyan> Second Action Items is also on StanLagun: stan_lagun, will create etherpad with list of changes planned in DSL for K
17:12:02 <StanLagun> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MuranoPL-Kilo
17:12:31 <katyafervent2> is it onky for muranoPL?
17:13:02 <StanLagun> this first part is strictly MuranoPL
17:13:10 <StanLagun> the second is related to MuranoPL
17:14:43 <serg_melikyan> I think we also need to think about refactoring core library (essentially second part of the etherpad)
17:15:36 <serg_melikyan> StanLagun: what do you think?
17:15:36 <StanLagun> agree, this also need to be done
17:16:04 <StanLagun> but thats another set of blueprints that nobody designed yet
17:16:26 <StanLagun> those in my list were already present in launchpad
17:16:34 <StanLagun> (in second part)
17:17:24 <serg_melikyan> Thank you :)
17:17:47 <serg_melikyan> #3 stan_lagun will move his document about versioning to the spec repo
17:18:54 <StanLagun> haven't done this yet. BTW we didn't merged initial commit yet
17:19:30 <serg_melikyan> #action serg_melikyan, review and merge initial commit with template to the murano-specs
17:20:12 <serg_melikyan> StanLagun: you are right :( But you can start moving versioning spec despite fact that initial template is not yet merged
17:21:12 <StanLagun> I know. It was very busy week. Sorry
17:22:49 <serg_melikyan> #4  Serg, discuss policy guided fulfillment and create all necessary BP
17:23:15 <smaes_web> hi
17:23:31 <serg_melikyan> My fault, had no time to do that :(
17:24:08 <serg_melikyan> #action serg_melikyan, discuss policy guided fulfillment and create all necessary BP
17:24:58 <serg_melikyan> #5 serg_melikyan, fill all missing BP in Roadmap
17:25:21 <serg_melikyan> again, this was really busy week ( Missed that too
17:25:43 <henarmunoz> Hi
17:25:59 <serg_melikyan> Hi, henarmunoz!
17:26:08 <StanLagun> Hi Henar!
17:26:52 <serg_melikyan> #topic Open Discussion
17:27:11 <serg_melikyan> We have more than 30 minutes for open discsussion
17:29:42 <Radek> I would like to ask about the template for BP (as an action item) - so all BP for Murano shall use it - is it correct?
17:30:18 <serg_melikyan> Not exactly - this template for specifications, not a for BP
17:30:25 <Radek> ok
17:30:34 <serg_melikyan> BP may be created in launchpad.net/murano
17:30:45 <StanLagun> but eventually all BPs should get their specs
17:30:57 <Radek> I saw that some specification just points to launchpad or etherpad - is it ok?
17:30:58 <serg_melikyan> correct
17:31:00 <Radek> ok :-)
17:31:25 <serg_melikyan> We are moving all specification from etherpads to the murano-specs
17:31:33 <StanLagun> I think it will point to githun
17:31:39 <StanLagun> *github
17:31:47 <Radek> ok, thanks
17:33:25 <StanLagun> I'd also like to ask everyone to review existing commits as we have some that are hanging in review for months
17:34:08 <Radek> btw if you are mentioning reviews & commits - who are the reviewers for Murano?
17:34:12 <StanLagun> And there are some major ones like Keystone trusts or Nova network support that need careful review
17:34:28 <StanLagun> anyone can review
17:35:03 <StanLagun> there are core reviewers group that has permissions to merge (say +2) commits
17:35:15 <StanLagun> others can say +1 or -1
17:35:15 <serg_melikyan> You just need to register, and you can review any patches
17:35:52 <Radek> ok. thanks
17:46:10 <serg_melikyan> Ok, if no questions let's finish early :)
17:46:20 <serg_melikyan> #endmeeting