17:00:39 <sergmelikyan> #startmeeting murano
17:00:40 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 23 17:00:39 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sergmelikyan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:41 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:43 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano'
17:00:46 <ativelkov> o/
17:00:51 <aderyugin_mp> Hi!
17:01:05 <sergmelikyan> Hi folks :)
17:01:22 <Nikolay_St> \0
17:01:47 <mgershen> Hi!
17:01:51 <kztsv_mbp> all
17:03:03 <freerunner> heya!
17:03:17 <sergmelikyan> #topic Action Items Review
17:03:34 <sergmelikyan> #1 kztsv_mbp: enable trusts by default, notify everyon via ML about this decision and rationale behind it.
17:03:57 <kztsv_mbp> done
17:04:11 <sergmelikyan> yeah, so but had no chance to read it yet :)
17:04:46 <sergmelikyan> #topic Choosing Cross Project Liaisons
17:05:21 <sergmelikyan> Folks, let's choose cwho is going to be responsible for what, and be contact point for other teams
17:05:30 <sergmelikyan> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons
17:05:49 <sergmelikyan> #1 Oslo
17:06:32 <sergmelikyan> I've started editing this page and added myself, but then decided that we need choose from our members
17:06:46 <sergmelikyan> Anyone would like to step-up for that?
17:07:52 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: looks like we don't have volunteers :(
17:08:07 <sergmelikyan> Yeah... then let's leave it as is...
17:08:24 <sergmelikyan> #2 Release Management
17:08:30 <kztsv_mbp> sergmelikyan: I'd like to take some of those, I think =)
17:08:38 <sergmelikyan> I will be happy to continue doing this by myself :)
17:08:44 <kztsv_mbp> sorry I'm not a fast typer today =)
17:08:47 <sergmelikyan> #3 QA
17:10:11 <freerunner> So tempting =)
17:10:12 <sergmelikyan> :)
17:10:41 <sergmelikyan> freerunner: what is stopping you? I would prefer someone who is core in the project but you are with-us for a long time already :)
17:10:42 <kztsv_mbp> let's put it like this. I want to take #documentation and can probably take #stable branch
17:10:53 <kztsv_mbp> sergmelikyan: freerunner he is not eligible
17:11:04 <kztsv_mbp> The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not need to be the PTL. The liaison should be prepared to assist with writing and reviewing patches that interact with their project, and with discussions of changes to the QA projects to make them easier to use within the project.
17:11:21 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: yeah... I forgot that we have this rule :(
17:11:46 <sergmelikyan> ok mooving on...
17:11:49 <Nikolay_St> kztsv_mbp: but murano-core is too small isn't it?
17:12:14 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: good point - we have 4-5 members currently
17:12:19 <Nikolay_St> I mean too small to drop core on every liaison
17:12:23 <kztsv_mbp> today is not the best meeting to choose those. We do not have slagun and katyafervent and filip
17:12:52 <ativelkov> right. Also, there is no rush: we didn't have much cross-project activities recently
17:12:56 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: we can start and on the next meeting ask if they would like to take something that is assigned to someone with more than 1
17:13:12 <sergmelikyan> assignment
17:13:27 <sergmelikyan> #3 QA - me for now, moving on
17:13:38 <sergmelikyan> #4 Documentation
17:13:46 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: do you take that? :)
17:14:23 <kztsv_mbp> yep, I'm wiling to take that
17:14:45 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: I hope our team will be much bigger given recent contributions :)
17:14:47 <kztsv_mbp> and stable/branch looks just like what I was doing with backporting anyway
17:14:49 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: done
17:15:02 <sergmelikyan> #5 Stable Branch
17:15:07 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: ?
17:16:04 <kztsv_mbp> sergmelikyan: like I said — "looks just like what I was doing with backporting anyway"
17:16:25 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: I am just confirming :)
17:16:31 <sergmelikyan> done
17:16:37 <sergmelikyan> #6 Vulnerability management
17:17:06 <sergmelikyan> I will take that by myself
17:17:16 <sergmelikyan> #7 API Working Group
17:17:28 <sergmelikyan> for that liaison may not be core :)
17:17:37 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: I can take this
17:17:44 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: done :)
17:17:58 <sergmelikyan> I will update wiki appropriately after the meeting :)
17:18:03 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: and also Log Working Group as far as I have some experience with this guys
17:18:21 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: thank you!
17:18:28 <Nikolay_St> but I'm not sure if they are still 'alive'
17:18:56 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: I not sure either
17:19:19 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: I'll go to tomorrow meeting and take a look
17:19:36 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: you are already in that table for Sahara :)
17:20:11 <sergmelikyan> #topic Open Discussion
17:20:12 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: yeap, I see :D
17:20:26 <Nikolay_St> sure
17:20:30 <sergmelikyan> Folks, we don't have other topics in our agenda, so speak up if you have something to discuss
17:20:46 <mgershen> Hi, I have added a new blueprint
17:20:56 <mgershen> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/add-support-for-heat-environments-and-files
17:21:20 <Nikolay_St> guys, I submit a spec last week. Now it's mostly done. Please take a look here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192250/
17:21:48 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: your blueprint looks good, except I would go with shorter description :)
17:22:09 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: we also use specs for defining specifications for the features
17:22:42 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: we definitely need more features in our heat-based packages!
17:22:55 <sergmelikyan> +1 for this BP to be approved for Liberty
17:22:55 <mgershen> true, It still needs fixes and some things needs to move to a spec, the idea is adding support for heat environments and additional files.
17:23:12 <sergmelikyan> any objections?
17:23:59 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: most of the review will happen in spec, BP is a way to track work in release scope, but it also not bad to have comprehending description
17:24:03 <mgershen> about my BP, should we discuss it next week or should i send an email to the mailing list?
17:24:41 <Nikolay_St> mgershen: mailing list looks good
17:25:04 <ativelkov> +1 for having this in L. Details may be discussed in spec, but overall I am with you on this
17:25:23 <Nikolay_St> mgershen: and also we can discuss it next week if some questions will appear
17:25:49 <mgershen> OK to all :)
17:28:08 <sergmelikyan> Then approved :) Let's wait for the spec :)
17:34:04 <sergmelikyan> Any other topics to discuss?
17:34:51 <Nikolay_St> sergmelikyan: nothing from my side
17:35:30 <sergmelikyan> let's give it few more minutes and finish todays meeting :)
17:36:05 <sergmelikyan> btw, we have new spec for TOSCA support https://review.openstack.org/194422
17:36:09 <sergmelikyan> from Vahid
17:37:50 <kztsv_mbp> yep it's going to be my bedtime reading I guess. Since we need to review it )
17:38:04 <sergmelikyan> kztsv_mbp: as well as spec fron Nikolay_St
17:38:18 <sergmelikyan> though I've seen comments from you already :)
17:38:28 <sergmelikyan> #endmeeting