17:00:08 <sergmelikyan> #startmeeting murano
17:00:09 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug 25 17:00:08 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sergmelikyan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano'
17:00:17 <sergmelikyan> o/
17:00:30 <StanLagun> o/
17:01:01 <kzaitsev_mb> o/
17:01:24 <FilipBlaha> Hi
17:01:34 <vahidh> Hi
17:01:35 <sergmelikyan> Agenda for today's meeting can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda
17:01:42 <katyafervent2> hi
17:02:45 <kzaitsev_mb> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda/Archive/2015-08-25/
17:04:38 <sergmelikyan> #topic Action Items Review
17:04:52 <sergmelikyan> #1 fix yaql legacy mode and release yaql rc3 after successful deployment
17:05:09 <sergmelikyan> I believe it's done :) We even have 1.0.0 release ready :)
17:05:31 <sergmelikyan> #2 kzaitsev_mb sum-up the UX concerns about the public/non-public packages on Package Definitions in ML
17:06:10 <kzaitsev_mb> sergmelikyan: yep, done. I believe we even have a commit, that fixes the ux issues
17:06:37 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: link?
17:06:46 <kzaitsev_mb> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216720/
17:06:49 <kzaitsev_mb> was looking up =)
17:07:02 <kzaitsev_mb> hm
17:07:07 <kzaitsev_mb> and haven't reviewed it
17:07:19 <kzaitsev_mb> it actually doesn't do what we agreed to do
17:07:29 <kzaitsev_mb> I thought we agreed to remove the filter completely..
17:07:41 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: and looks like commit needs to be rebased
17:08:46 <kzaitsev_mb> sergmelikyan: everything needs to be rebased right now =)
17:08:54 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: I would appreciate your feedback on this commit
17:08:59 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: yaql?
17:09:20 <kzaitsev_mb> I mean, have you seen the queue?
17:09:36 <sergmelikyan> not yet :) It's morning here :)
17:09:40 <kzaitsev_mb> we have like a dozen of patches red, that should turn green, since yaql landed
17:09:53 <sergmelikyan> I caught a cold on a weekend, so was sleeping until hour ago :(
17:10:21 <sergmelikyan> fever and sore throat... I hate it %)
17:10:35 <kzaitsev_mb> bummer
17:10:46 <kzaitsev_mb> get well soon =)
17:10:51 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: thx :)
17:11:17 <sergmelikyan> I bought a ton of different stuff for cold, let's how it's working :)
17:11:27 <sergmelikyan> #3 verify that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211608/ don't break anything then produce next steps with UI
17:11:48 <sergmelikyan> I don't see reviews on latest patch-sets...
17:12:22 <StanLagun> and it also need to be rebased to new engine code
17:12:23 <sergmelikyan> katyafervent & kzaitsev_mb have folks checked this commit?
17:13:01 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: I propose to discuss next steps regarding yaql that we need to take after commits were landed
17:13:24 <kzaitsev_mb> sergmelikyan: hmmm, I think I haven't will look into it sooner this week
17:13:54 <sergmelikyan> mm?
17:14:01 * sergmelikyan didn't get the sentence
17:14:38 <StanLagun> sergmelikyan: this is not about yaql. It is just that environment support is in merge conflict
17:15:47 <kzaitsev_mb> I mean I haven't looked into the patch, but will do this week
17:16:34 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: thx!
17:16:47 <sergmelikyan> #topic Migrating to yaql 1.0 status
17:16:58 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: so where we are regarding yaql?
17:17:56 <katyafervent2> is it logging api? i think we need unit tests for that
17:18:09 <sergmelikyan> katyafervent2: mmm?
17:18:13 <StanLagun> yaql 1.0.0 has been released, new python-muranoclient as well. New engine with yaql 1.0 was landed today. Dashboar support for 1.0 is waiting in zuul queue for dwsm job to become green
17:18:18 * sergmelikyan feels stupid
17:18:51 <StanLagun> there might be some regressions. One known regression is that congress dwsm job is red. The fixxing commit is also waiting in zuul
17:19:11 <katyafervent2> just commit to the dashboard left to merge
17:19:13 <katyafervent2> i've updated it today
17:19:33 <kzaitsev_mb> so we can finally remove this item from our weekly meetings! =)
17:19:43 <StanLagun> dashboard is stack in zuul for 2 hours already
17:20:36 <StanLagun> *stuck*
17:21:00 <kzaitsev_mb> And we should retrigger all the things! )
17:21:11 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: it's just waiting it's turn to be checked or something is wrong?
17:21:17 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: lol :)
17:21:44 <StanLagun> as for now 4/5 jobs are green one in queued
17:23:01 <sergmelikyan> let's move to the next topic?
17:23:07 <sergmelikyan> #topic Artifact (glance v3) transition status update
17:23:50 <katyafervent2> sorry, my internet is slow
17:24:22 <kzaitsev_mb> since ativelkov is not here, Serg, can you maybe tell us few words about the procedure of migrating towards artifacts?
17:24:52 <kzaitsev_mb> From what I know — 1) we're going to copy-paste some of v3 client functionality into muranoclient
17:25:14 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: I believe latest update on the mailing list, we agreed to develop new glance client functionality in future branch and copy to murano client for now
17:26:09 <sergmelikyan> support for Artifact Repository should be considered experimental for Liberty
17:28:40 <sergmelikyan> #topic Add support for heat environments status
17:29:08 <mgershen> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211608/
17:29:12 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: I see that we need to wait until commit is going to be re-checked :)
17:29:56 <mgershen> yes, but from what I hear here, I am optimistic :)
17:30:26 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: You need to check out this commit :) Looks good for me, but I may be missing something :)
17:30:28 <mgershen> also there were good feedbacks, even with jenkins and murano-ci giving -1
17:30:33 <StanLagun> mgershen: please rebase it first
17:30:38 <kzaitsev_mb> mgershen: yep, new engine forze almoust everything for a couple of days, but since it landed we're going to review the patches faster, hopefully +)
17:31:02 <mgershen> StanLagun: OK I will
17:31:15 <katyafervent2> yeah, ping us in irc if needed
17:31:26 <mgershen> kzaitsev_mb: +1 for that :)
17:32:02 <mgershen> katyafervent2: you are so kind, I will
17:32:47 <mgershen> I think we should be able to close it by the feature freeze
17:33:11 <sergmelikyan> I believe so
17:34:15 <mgershen> I have no more updates :)
17:34:29 <sergmelikyan> #topic Open Mitaka spec branch? (kzaitsev_mb)
17:35:29 <sergmelikyan> I think we can create folder for Mitaka specs in murano-specs
17:35:42 <Nikolay_St> isn't it too early?
17:35:45 <kzaitsev_mb> I think we have a couple of specs and/or bps that we're definitelly not going to land in L
17:35:55 <Nikolay_St> I'm a little bit out of dates :(
17:36:03 <sergmelikyan> Nikolay_St: I would say it's kinda late
17:36:26 <kzaitsev_mb> so opening M specs looks like a nice idea, to continue that work
17:36:34 <katyafervent2> i have one spec for M
17:36:41 <kzaitsev_mb> see! =)
17:36:50 <sergmelikyan> kzaitsev_mb: go ahead and create folder for Mitaka in murano-specs :)
17:36:57 <kzaitsev_mb> we can start contributing early =)
17:36:59 <katyafervent2> i can do the commit tommorow
17:37:02 <mgershen> and feature freeze is next week, so +1
17:37:17 <kzaitsev_mb> #agreed open M spec folder
17:37:21 <kzaitsev_mb> will do =)
17:37:25 <mgershen> by the way will there be a spec freeze in M?
17:38:21 <sergmelikyan> mgershen: we didn't yet introduced spec freeze for our project
17:38:48 <mgershen> OK, so never mind
17:38:55 <kzaitsev_mb> mgershen: Well, if we start early — we might actually have all the specs in place in time =)
17:41:08 <sergmelikyan> #topic Open Discussion
17:42:28 <vahidh> sergmelikyan: Thanks. I just wanted to thank those who reviewed the latest tosca support spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194422) and kindly ask for a few more reviews so we can finalize it and start coding asap :)
17:44:29 <sergmelikyan> vahidh: not merged spec technically doesn't block from coding, though I agree - this spec requires more reviews given a lot's of comments from StanLagun previously
17:44:58 <katyafervent2> vahidh, you can start coding already)
17:44:58 <katyafervent2> i think there will be no more major comments
17:45:41 <vahidh> sure, I just wanted to make sure Stan has no major disagreement with what's in there
17:48:11 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: can you take a look?
17:48:36 <StanLagun> vahidh: I haven't reviewed last spec version. Sorry. Though I don't expect any issues since we have agreed already
17:49:40 <sergmelikyan> StanLagun: we spent some time with vahidh few weeks ago going through spec, it would be awesome if you would take a look.
17:49:44 <StanLagun> 1 week to HCF is a tough time :) HCF is coming... (c) :)
17:49:56 <sergmelikyan> :D
17:49:56 <vahidh> StanLagun: great. I'll move on with learning the code and taking on the action items. thanks :)
17:50:33 <StanLagun> since it is not going to land in L can we postpone it until HCF?
17:51:07 <StanLagun> I mean the implementation is not ready
17:51:23 <StanLagun> we can merge spec for M
17:51:47 <vahidh> StanLagun: sure, but since my boss is pushing for it, I'll start with the coding and wait for your review when you get a chance
17:53:34 <StanLagun> promise to review everything on the gerrit. Just lets leave things that doesn't have to land before HCF until HCF happens. Which is just one week away
17:54:30 <vahidh> great, thank you. I understand.
17:56:31 <sergmelikyan> #endmeeting