17:00:19 <kzaitsev_mb> #startmeeting murano 17:00:20 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb 7 17:00:19 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kzaitsev_mb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano' 17:02:17 <kzaitsev_mb> #topic Open Discussion 17:02:51 <felipemonteiro> kzaitsev_mb: I've begun adding items to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/murano-atlanta-ptg 17:03:25 <felipemonteiro> Also created bp for TLS support here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/add-tls-support 17:05:43 <kzaitsev_mb> cool 17:06:10 <kzaitsev_mb> sorry for being inactive on IRC/gerrit lately 17:06:29 <felipemonteiro> No worries. 17:06:58 <kzaitsev_mb> I took a small vacation last weekend and was a bit busy with another project of mine 17:07:22 <kzaitsev_mb> I still have to create a stable branch for ocata for dashboard I guess ) 17:07:35 <kzaitsev_mb> would do so later today or tommorow early morning 17:08:23 <felipemonteiro> kzaitsev_mb: Understandable, I was sick all weekend. 17:09:09 <felipemonteiro> Is there any interest in the community to look into TLS support for Murano? Otherwise I'll assign that bp to myself. 17:10:59 <kzaitsev_mb> not at the moment, I guess. I'd love to get back and implement smth on murano, but at the moment everyone's busy doing something 17:11:08 <kzaitsev_mb> although it's usually like that around release weeks 17:14:49 <felipemonteiro> There's been interest raised where I work for sharing packages across specific packages. I told them this would require a spec, discussion, etc. Was I right? 17:15:04 <felipemonteiro> packages across specific projects* 17:17:39 <kzaitsev_mb> felipemonteiro: at this point we only have public 17:17:47 <kzaitsev_mb> and frankly 17:18:21 <kzaitsev_mb> if we stick with using glare 17:18:26 <kzaitsev_mb> it's going to be in glare 17:19:01 <kzaitsev_mb> glare would be responsible for artifact visibility, not murano. Murano would only have to implement that on the UI side 17:19:38 <felipemonteiro> I see. Are there plans to eventually, in the future, deprecate Murano's package class? 17:21:52 <kzaitsev_mb> package class? 17:22:02 <kzaitsev_mb> you mean db storage of packages? 17:22:05 <kzaitsev_mb> well, yes 17:22:08 <felipemonteiro> Yes, in models.py. 17:22:10 <kzaitsev_mb> we had ) 17:22:30 <kzaitsev_mb> but glare had a bumpy road over the past 1-2 years 17:23:04 <kzaitsev_mb> so it mostly depends on implementing glare 1.0 and glare being supported alive project 17:23:12 <felipemonteiro> I'm probably getting a little ahead of myself anyway. We need to prioritize upgrading to glare v1 as was already emntioned. 17:23:15 <felipemonteiro> Yea 17:26:15 <felipemonteiro> I'm also wondering whether you know there's any dev working going toward dynamic ui change (i.e. making dynamic ui actually dynamic). 17:28:25 <felipemonteiro> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/schema-driven-ui 17:28:39 <kzaitsev_mb> felipemonteiro: none from mirantis 17:28:57 <kzaitsev_mb> oracle guys expressed interest in that thing 17:29:04 <kzaitsev_mb> but I'm not sure if they started 17:29:27 <felipemonteiro> This was something a team at ATT expressed interest in too 17:31:28 <felipemonteiro> That's pretty much all the open topic discussion items I had :) 17:31:52 <kzaitsev_mb> that was a lot more that I had tbh ) 17:32:03 <kzaitsev_mb> have you seen the mascot, btw? 17:32:29 <felipemonteiro> Yeah, it's pretty cool, although not what I expected haha 17:35:07 <kzaitsev_mb> huh, I don't think we're expecting anyone to show up =) let's finish early today? 17:35:52 <felipemonteiro> kzaitsev_mb: Sounds good to me. 17:37:33 <kzaitsev_mb> ok =) ping me if you would have any more questions =) 17:37:37 <kzaitsev_mb> #endmeeting