21:01:21 #startmeeting Networking 21:01:22 Meeting started Mon Apr 22 21:01:21 2013 UTC. The chair is markmcclain. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:25 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:01:36 #link agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings 21:01:55 Hi! 21:02:13 (I'm in vacation and in JST now ) 21:02:17 I was great to see nearly everyone at the summit last week. 21:02:19 danwent: i am trying to recover from the run :) 21:02:46 hi 21:02:47 garyk: haha, more likely recover from the flight 21:03:13 garyk probably kept running up and down the aisle in his flight 21:03:14 danwent: it was a long way back. got in just in time. there is a general strike now 21:03:20 haha 21:03:21 :) 21:03:23 I hope everyone had uneventful flights home. 21:03:24 garyk: ugh 21:03:41 We're back to a more regular schedule this week. 21:04:28 One of the items many of you may have noticed is that we're dropping the Quantum codename. 21:05:09 haha 21:05:10 In formal setting we should use OpenStack Networking and in informal settings we're working on new codename. 21:05:17 who is 'quantum'? 21:05:23 * markmcclain forgot 21:05:27 any ETAs on the new name? 21:05:27 danwent: I will never die! 21:05:32 :) 21:05:34 haha 21:05:36 Quantum is dead, long live Networking! 21:05:48 * arosen kuantum 21:06:01 The good thing is we get to pick a new nameā€¦ if you have suggestions email me. 21:06:23 lets call it "fios";-) 21:06:26 Along with the name change is tweak to how we send email to the dev list 21:06:36 please no names after fury rodens 21:06:44 Try to start using [Networking] as the topic in the subject. 21:07:05 goes to update his email filters.... 21:07:07 #info Switch to [Networking] in openstack-dev email 21:08:00 I'm not sure a generic official name like 'openstack networking' is a good choice, given that it could refer to either of nova and not-quantum. 21:08:38 marun: Understandable, but for now we need to use the formal name 21:08:40 marun: i think this is just temporary 21:08:45 ah, fair enough 21:09:09 i heard rumblings that all projects would officially become 'openstack foo', ditching the codenames. 21:09:10 Once we can go through all of the renaming hoops (and there are many) we'll revisit 21:10:40 The final release schedule has not been published, but expect to see a similar format to Grizzly. 21:11:13 Three milestone releases and an RC period. 21:11:37 #info H1 is a little over a month away (last week of May). 21:11:42 #info openstack grizzly docs release is expected April 30th 21:11:54 we still have some work to do. 21:12:02 danwent: That we do 21:13:17 I left docs off the agenda, so we'll add it at the tend 21:13:20 *end. 21:13:41 k 21:14:15 For new features discussed at the summit, we need to make the blueprints revised to reflect the consensus and the correct sub-team lead approves. 21:15:04 #topics Bugs 21:15:27 Bugs were mostly quiet last week while everyone was the summit. 21:16:13 I've been following this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1168994 21:16:14 Launchpad bug 1168994 in nova "nova+quantum floatingip overlapping ip wrong info" [Undecided,In progress] 21:17:21 Any other bugs we that need to be raised outside of subteam reports? 21:17:22 I think it is not nova but rather quantum https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1169706 21:17:23 Launchpad bug 1169706 in quantum "list floating IPs does not honor port_id filter" [Undecided,New] 21:18:10 jackmccann: thanks for the link 21:18:33 #topic API 21:18:43 salv-orlando: still around or did you have to leave already? 21:18:45 hello again 21:19:03 mostly quiet on the API side, code-wise 21:19:11 we have a ton to do yet on documentation 21:19:26 good progress has been made, but the patches have not yet landed 21:19:44 please check the meeting agenda or netconn-api on gerrit for reviewing them 21:19:53 I'm reviewing the provider extension doc 21:19:59 and thanks to armax, alexxu and amotoki for the reviews so far 21:20:54 salv-orlando: sure, feel free to submit more reviews to my attention 21:20:56 there also a few patches out for review regarding the API (havana patches) 21:21:08 but nothing that needs attention so far 21:21:28 that is all for today from the API side 21:22:23 Thanks for the update. 21:23:43 For those who've got some cycles take a look at the doc patches. 21:23:45 #topic L3/IPAM/DHCP 21:24:48 For Havana there were some informal discussions regarding IPv6 and IPAM at the summit. Those will be brought to the list in the coming days. 21:25:30 I forgot to ask if any had questions for salv-orlando? 21:25:43 too late 21:25:44 :) 21:26:31 #topic Nova Integration 21:27:03 markmcclain: not much to report here 21:27:22 next week i plan to start to look at the migration paths that we spoke about at summit 21:27:56 i'll try and get a doc to the list in a couple of days to get inputs 21:28:04 For those who couldn't make it, in the joint session with the Nova team we discussed what are the possible migration paths away from nova-net? 21:29:45 Members from both teams are looking into a few different scenarios and are going to report back their findings on what the migration would entail (ie run offline, require API outages, etc). 21:30:24 Any questions on Nova integration? 21:31:02 #topic Security/Firewalling 21:31:12 markmcclain: nothing new to report here from me. 21:31:36 Is vpn in this category? 21:31:50 I have been trying to make progress on FWaaS as discussed during the summit 21:31:53 FWaaS will be covered in this topic? 21:31:55 nati_ueno: VPN is L3 21:32:07 Yes FWaaS will fall under this sub-team 21:32:32 SumitNaiksatam: blueprint or code progress? 21:32:42 both 21:32:42 markmcclain: It is OK for me, but L2 VPN guys may claim :) 21:33:27 nati_ueno: some of the sub-team boundaries are rough approximations 21:33:40 we cannot handle more categories than now :-) 21:33:47 markmcclain: sure 21:34:12 amotoki: I agree 21:34:35 SumitNaiksatam: good to hear 21:36:32 SumitNaiksatam: can we make sure blueprint links directly to the google doc? 21:36:41 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-fwaas 21:36:43 ok 21:36:49 will do 21:37:01 thanks 21:37:05 there will be more as well, this one is about API, and resource model 21:37:22 working on that, should have more details by next meeting 21:37:59 nice.. will look forward to it 21:38:21 Any more questions for Security Group/Firewall subtema? 21:38:56 #topic LBaaS 21:39:54 The LBaaS met during unconference time work out the next steps and will be filing updated blueprints to detail the changes. 21:40:49 We're also starting to see proposed vendor implementations which is exciting after the months of work this team has put into the effort. 21:41:30 woot 21:41:43 Any questions on LBaaS? 21:41:43 awesome! 21:42:19 #topic Python Client 21:43:22 I don't see Yong online, but work has resumed on version 3.0 of the client. A WIP will be published soon what that the changes can get maximum testing during this cycle. 21:43:44 Any client questions? 21:44:01 it is better to restart the discussion and work passing None (null) from client. 21:44:48 amotoki: Yes. We should revive the thread since there will be a few tweaks to the CLI as part of the 3.0 release 21:44:59 will add it to the topic on the next meeting 21:45:14 Thanks 21:45:23 #topic Stable Branch (garyk) 21:45:52 there are a few backports for review 21:45:59 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/quantum+branch:stable/grizzly,n,z 21:46:17 in addition to this there are a few bugs marked as backport potential 21:46:47 https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=grizzly-backport-potential 21:46:57 21:47:01 there is also a stable/folsom backport that require review 21:47:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27292/ 21:47:29 Are there going to be anymore stable/folsom releases? 21:47:43 markmcclain: not sure. i need to check 21:48:42 ok 21:49:06 Any other questions on stable? 21:50:30 garyk: Thanks for agreeing to lead this team again. It is a very valuable service to the community that relies on our stable releases. 21:50:43 #topic Systems Tests 21:50:50 markmcclain: thanks 21:51:09 nati_ueno marun? 21:51:38 markmcclain: waiting to talk to you. 21:51:40 OK the highest priority for test is get full tempest pass with quantum 21:52:04 mlavalle is working on that correct? 21:52:08 correct 21:52:38 marun: yep I'll coordinate with you offline to unblock your progress 21:53:15 #topic Horizon amotoki 21:53:57 there is no news today. I put the link of my presentation in the meeting wiki page. 21:54:57 amotoki: Thanks for the link. I hated the Horizon track was opposite ours. 21:55:12 #topics Documentation (danwent) 21:55:35 so we have the same 6 'high' priority admin doc bugs as we had two weeks ago: 21:55:35 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structu 21:55:36 subscriber=&field.tag=quantum&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on 21:56:00 i will knock out https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1152838 tonight 21:56:02 Launchpad bug 1152838 in openstack-manuals "update quantum physical layout diagram" [High,Triaged] 21:56:23 markmcclain: you have db migration + metadata proxy 21:56:35 I also have lbaas workflow + ubuntu install 21:57:06 i will ping doc folks to confirm that they are taking care of https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1157031 21:57:07 Launchpad bug 1157031 in openstack-manuals "q-admin: update or remove appendix B" [High,Confirmed] 21:57:33 other than asking if anyone wants to jump in and help out, its really just about finding the cycles. 21:57:53 the docs team is pretty great about getting reviews on admin guide stuff. 21:58:24 Yeah. I finally have extra cycles to push up my work. 21:58:29 salv-orlando seems to have covered API docs above. 21:58:37 Thanks for leading the charge on docs 21:58:54 thankfully for me, writing docs is more fun than wading through the email that piled up in my inbox while at the summit :) 21:59:03 so i should make some good progress on docs this week 21:59:50 i actually need to run to another meeting, as our time is up 22:00:07 thanks for update 22:00:07 arosen: thanks! your mail helped (now i just need to update oslo) 22:00:16 good night guys 22:00:27 #topic other teams 22:00:28 garyk: awesome! np 22:00:33 bye folks. 22:01:41 Since we're running short: rkukura has posted a Work in Progress for the ML2 plugin. Please take a look as it initially works to unify the open source plugins into one code base. 22:01:57 ml2 update will be later this week 22:01:59 #topic OpenDiscussion 22:02:20 rkukura: thanks for the correction that the update is pending 22:03:12 I'll also try to get status on all blueprints/reviews for the opensource plugins for next weeks meeting 22:03:29 rkukura: sounds great 22:03:41 Any other items for Open Discussion? 22:05:41 Ok well we're a little over time. We had a great summit and I'm excited about the work we'll be doing during the Havana cycle. H1 is going to be here really quick, so make sure to take this week to update blueprints for approval, so that we can get to work. 22:05:56 #endmeeting