21:01:54 #startmeeting networking 21:01:55 Meeting started Mon Apr 29 21:01:54 2013 UTC. The chair is markmcclain. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:57 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:59 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:02:32 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings 21:03:04 #topic Announcements 21:03:26 In case you missed it the Havana release schedule is availalbe 21:03:29 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Havana_Release_Schedule 21:03:42 H1 is a month from tomorrow 21:04:45 Reminder there is a two day buffer, so features must be merged by end of day on May 28th to make H1 21:05:43 I know everyone has been working hard to get blueprints file and/or updated 21:06:06 I'd like to have all of the blueprints in by Friday 21:07:13 I'd also like to revive Review Days 21:07:21 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/ReviewDays 21:07:55 I recycled the default availability, so take a look and make sure it still works for your current schedule 21:08:17 Any questions before we move onto reports? 21:08:23 Do we need to wake garyk up? 21:08:41 yeah. 21:09:08 # topic bugs 21:09:22 extra space 21:09:42 danwent: Add extra to agenda? 21:09:55 #topic bugs 21:10:12 ah 21:10:51 #topic bugs 21:11:04 thanks for the correction :) 21:11:32 garyk reported this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1174293 21:11:34 Launchpad bug 1174293 in quantum "Network creation does not notify DHCP agent" [High,In progress] 21:11:55 seems to be the only pressing bug at the moment 21:12:00 are there any others? 21:12:13 there is also one about ovs and flows with tunneling. looking for the id. 21:13:27 this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1167916? 21:13:29 Launchpad bug 1167916 in quantum "ovs plugin generating the same endpoint number" [Undecided,Incomplete] 21:14:51 or this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1174315 21:14:53 Launchpad bug 1174315 in quantum "Possible race condition in add_tunnel_endpoint() function" [Undecided,New] 21:14:59 no. it was about flow entries being built incorrectly. 21:15:18 the KeyError one? 21:15:34 is this one related? https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1174315 21:15:41 https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1154383 21:15:43 ops 21:15:43 Launchpad bug 1154383 in quantum "Invalid entries in OVS flow table on a 3 node install using GRE Tunnels" [Undecided,Confirmed] 21:15:44 sorry 21:16:07 sorry it is late and i am slower than usual (which is exceptionally slow...) 21:17:19 ok.. it was confirmed by someone other than the reporter can someone look into this one? 21:17:55 i can try towards the end of the week. 21:18:09 ok 21:18:58 #topic API 21:19:02 salv-orlando: hi 21:19:09 hi 21:19:32 docs look to be improving 21:19:43 Let's start with docs 21:20:01 We have now 5 outstanding patches, and we need to merge them by tomorrow 21:20:17 most of them have at least 1 +2 21:20:42 but we need help for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27217/ 21:20:58 salv-orlando: i can review that one. 21:21:00 it would be good if a core dev can step up and help me with ther reviews 21:21:03 thanks arosen 21:21:25 On the blueprint side, we have two blueprints targeting havana-1 21:21:36 salv-orlando is the author for both. 21:22:06 We have a question around how to do authZ on ext-gw-modes - and I will follow up on ML 21:22:21 Iok 21:22:22 ok 21:22:37 2 patches for make-authz-orthoghonal have already been merged. A 3rd patch will come soon. In total there should be 4 patches 21:23:02 There are also some bugs which might be worth discussing, but probably it's better to move to the next topic. 21:23:26 Bug are linked in the agenda - and discussion can happen offline 21:24:13 sounds good.. any questions on the API? 21:24:36 markmcclain: I forgot to mention on blueprints 21:24:45 are you going to retarget yours for H-1? 21:24:53 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/l3-router-port-relationship 21:25:03 Yes… Still updating after our discussion on Friday 21:25:08 oh you already did 21:25:08 nvm 21:26:21 #topic L3/IPAM/DHCP/VPNaaS 21:26:27 nachi_: around? 21:26:48 markmcclain: i think he is on vacation 21:27:01 I can give a quick update on vpn if nachi's out today 21:27:04 I can talk for VPNaaS 21:27:11 sthakkar: go ahead 21:27:19 sounds good 21:27:30 so we have decided to prioritize ipsec as the vpn type addressed 21:27:36 We have posted the Blueprint for the IPsec VPNaaS 21:27:47 there is a follow up meeting on wednesday to discuss further details 21:27:51 at 5pm PST 21:27:56 all interested parties are welcome 21:28:02 the goal is nail down the api def 21:28:05 and then slot work items 21:28:19 nachi, swami and i are coordinating on this front 21:28:33 will VPN be implemented as process-on-host as is LBaaS currently? 21:28:38 by next monday we'll have more details on the full definition 21:28:55 Yes that is the current plan to implement vpn as similar to LBaaS 21:29:39 ill take the action of sending an update after the wednesday meeting on the progress 21:29:49 thats all for now :) 21:30:06 great thanks for the update on VPN 21:31:20 On the IPv6 front, we're working on revising to existing blueprints to bring them within the scope of Havana.. there will me more later in the week 21:31:45 #topic Nova Integration 21:32:26 not much has been done here. i am in the process of trying to test live migrations from nova to quantum (ran into a few issues along the way) 21:32:36 i have stared https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K2UuY0NBnOdz1w8FRtW0GTVe6WVA4GuZI80eul59r6I/edit?usp=sharing if antyone wants to add 21:33:34 The doc looks like a good start 21:33:55 #topic Security/Firewalling 21:34:00 arosen: hi 21:34:17 markmcclain: hey 21:34:28 so there was one bug reported about the security group stuff. I'm working on a fix for it 21:34:33 that's about it on my front 21:34:46 I have posted the plan for firewall: 21:34:47 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/FWaaS/HavanaPlan 21:35:16 we have the work items outlined, time to get it to work :-) 21:35:40 Rajesh (Dell) also signed up for work, thanks to him! 21:35:58 Marco (Embrane) had some good suggestions on two items: 21:36:28 1. from an operational perspective it would be good to have the ability to enable/disable rules in a policy 21:36:44 2. it will be good to have a view of hits for a rule 21:36:55 thinking about how to incorporate those 21:37:10 otherwise, things look promising 21:37:18 thats my update 21:38:06 yeah those seem like good suggestions.. just want to make sure we don't try to do too much at once 21:38:12 yeah 21:38:14 agree 21:39:19 Any questions on Security Groups/Firewalling? 21:39:49 #topic LBaaS 21:40:00 i can update 21:40:11 please do 21:40:27 we've identified primary tasks we need to do. need to agree on design 21:41:05 one of the action item would be to think on how to incorporate service types into lbaas api 21:41:29 I hope salv-orlando will participate in corresponding discussion 21:41:47 sure np 21:41:54 enikanorov: I think that applies to services in general 21:42:13 have some ideas around this 21:42:14 yes. but i guess lbaas will be there first :) 21:42:44 enikanorov: what do you mean by services types? 21:42:45 true, but we should do it in a way that all services can use the same framework 21:42:56 also, i think lbaas needs it's own meeting to discuss design 21:43:07 emagana: service types framework added by salv-orlando 21:43:50 in fact there are several important questions around it that need to be resolved. 21:43:57 we should discuss service types on the mailing list as I think there a few folks that will want to weigh in 21:44:03 enikanorov: ok, thanks! 21:44:13 enikanorov, markmcclain: agree 21:44:21 markmcclain: ok. i think i'll start the discussion then 21:44:28 enikanorov: sounds good 21:44:58 Any other LBaaS questions? 21:45:12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1157034 21:45:14 Launchpad bug 1157034 in openstack-manuals "quantum lbaas install - Ubuntu" [High,Confirmed] 21:45:25 we have two 'high' bugs for lbaas docs in grizzly 21:45:50 the one above is assigned to ilya 21:45:55 but hasn't seen action in a month 21:46:05 arisen volunteered today to take on the other one 21:46:05 Ilya is on vacation until 6th of may 21:46:17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1156828 21:46:19 Launchpad bug 1156828 in openstack-manuals "q-admin: basic lbaas workflow" [High,In progress] 21:46:31 arosen: can you write up the install stuff as well? 21:46:40 should be pretty basic 21:46:42 working on the walk through stuff for lbaas doc for that now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1156828 21:46:44 yup 21:46:47 thx 21:46:54 arosen: thx 21:47:24 #topic Stable Branch 21:47:31 enikanorov: good to know about ilya. I will shepherd the lbaas API doc patch then 21:48:48 Looks like there is only one review pending, so we'll jump to testing 21:48:52 #topic Testing 21:48:57 marun: hi 21:49:04 hi 21:49:26 Not much to report 21:49:43 ok 21:49:52 For everyone else's benefit, I had a conversation with Mark last week whose outcome was limiting the scope of the refactor to the tests. 21:50:28 I had thought it would be necessary to refactor the code itself to make my intended approach viable, but I agree with Mark's assessment that such an effort is unviable in the short term. 21:51:08 Nachi and Miguel will have to speak to the progress of their respective testing efforts. 21:51:28 That's it for me. 21:52:10 thanks for the update.. I don't see nachi on miguel around 21:52:25 #topic Other Items 21:52:33 rkukura: Update on ML2? 21:53:18 Getting some comments on WIP patch - will update tomorrow, then add linuxbridge agent support later this week 21:53:26 #info openstack-manuals is having their grizzly release tomorrow 21:53:35 will also update blueprint with plan 21:53:51 rkukura: great 21:53:57 #info any docs you submit after that will need to be back ported for grizzly, so let them know that as part of the bug. 21:54:03 danwent: hadn't forgotten about you :) 21:54:05 Could use feedback on driver API approach 21:54:21 markmcclain: ah, k 21:55:02 I know there was lots of interest in ML2 21:55:06 so take a look here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20105/ 21:55:09 if you haven't 21:55:31 danwent: Docs are cut tomorrow 21:55:44 I'll take a look the backlog that salv-orlando mentioned 21:55:52 any items we missed with the other reports? 21:56:09 markmcclain: yes, db migration + metadata install for admin guide 21:56:21 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs?field.tag=quantum 21:57:02 I'll ask the docs team to deal with appendix B (perhaps for now we just put a caveat that it is not updated for Grizzly?): https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1157031 21:57:04 Launchpad bug 1157031 in openstack-manuals "q-admin: update or remove appendix B" [High,Confirmed] 21:58:11 I think that makes sense 21:58:27 someone on the docs team says they plan to auto-generate 21:58:33 but unlikely to happen by tomorrow 21:58:51 Yeah 22:00:00 Any other open discussion items? 22:00:12 i am going to crash. good night guys 22:00:19 oops doc items? 22:00:20 garyk: later 22:00:41 markmcclain: btw, I was thinking admin docs should have a section that talks about the folsom -> grizzly upgrade overall 22:01:08 that is, not just about the db migration, but also about what config options were deprecated, which new ones are required, and which new agents where added. 22:01:40 I think that would be a good section to have 22:01:49 ok, i will file a bug for it. 22:02:24 great… seems like the kind of item for each release 22:02:49 yeah, in fact, it looks like there may be a general bug for all projects already… looking into it. we can take it offline 22:03:13 Sounds good… any other open discussion items? 22:04:25 For the folks with spare cycles, don't forget to take a look at the pending doc reviews. 22:04:30 #endmeeting