14:01:54 <jlibosva> #startmeeting networking
14:01:55 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 14 14:01:54 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jlibosva. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:57 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:57 <yanyanhu> looks like my network is poor :(
14:01:59 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:02:02 <yanyanhu> sorry for this
14:02:11 <mlavalle> o/
14:02:12 <jlibosva> Hello friends!
14:02:15 <ataraday_> hi
14:02:16 <amotoki> o/
14:02:17 <bcafarel> hi
14:02:22 <john-davidge> o/
14:02:23 <trevormc> o/
14:02:23 <yamahata> hello
14:02:24 <dalvarez> o/
14:02:26 <annp> Hi
14:02:34 <jlibosva> #topic Announcements
14:02:37 <dasanind> hi
14:02:43 <dasm> o/
14:02:45 <jlibosva> Seems like there are no new announcements on the wiki
14:02:47 <ajo> late o/
14:03:08 <jlibosva> ttx sent out an email with information about Forum at the next OS summit, might be worth reading for those who plan to attend
14:03:16 <jlibosva> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-March/113459.html
14:03:33 <jlibosva> Also Emilien sent one to collect ideas about the format
14:03:39 <jlibosva> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-March/113115.html
14:03:59 <jlibosva> So that was about upcoming summit
14:04:02 <jlibosva> Regarding stadium
14:04:11 <jlibosva> ofagent is about to be retired
14:04:15 <EmilienM> (let me know any question)
14:04:32 <jlibosva> :)
14:04:34 <jlibosva> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441488/
14:05:06 <jlibosva> That's all announcements from me, anybody has anything to announce?
14:05:50 <jlibosva> Let's move on then
14:05:52 <jlibosva> #topic Blueprints
14:06:02 <jlibosva> https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/pike-1
14:06:35 <jlibosva> We have 14 BP - Does anybody want to raise anything here? Is anybody blocked with his work?
14:07:34 <jlibosva> Seems like we can jump to bugs then
14:07:44 <jlibosva> #topic Bugs and gate failures
14:08:03 <jlibosva> There has been one critical bug around for a while
14:08:22 <jlibosva> this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1627106
14:08:22 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1627106 in neutron "TimeoutException while executing tests adding bridge using OVSDB native" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Terry Wilson (otherwiseguy)
14:08:34 <ihrachys> it's gone right?
14:08:39 <jlibosva> It looks like it would worth to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425623/ in
14:08:40 <ihrachys> I see functional is stable lately
14:08:46 <jlibosva> yes, I was about to say that
14:08:47 <ihrachys> see http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate?panelId=7&fullscreen
14:08:51 <ihrachys> ok
14:09:04 <jlibosva> but it seems the failure rate got down even before we merged terry's patch :)
14:09:26 <jlibosva> and there is still the patch ajo has ^^
14:09:32 <ihrachys> did it? there were several fixes by otherwiseguy
14:09:39 <ajo> About the patch
14:09:39 <ajo> I'd like to talk with terry about it
14:09:41 <ajo> It was my understanding that that wasn't the timeout to tweak
14:09:46 <ajo> this tweaks the timeout of a request to ovsdb
14:09:47 <ajo> but
14:10:03 <ajo> it was some sort of low level heartbeat protocol timeout what I understood was timing out
14:10:06 <ajo> and dropping the connections
14:10:11 <ajo> abut I could have got it wrong
14:10:13 <ajo> ping otherwiseguy
14:10:14 <ajo> :)
14:10:24 <jlibosva> ajo: did you see his last comments on the patch?
14:10:33 <ajo> jlibosva in fact I didn't: reading
14:10:46 <ajo> ah
14:10:47 <ajo> :D
14:11:19 <ajo> so let's move forward
14:11:22 <jlibosva> so we should decide whether we want to get that in and eventually close the LP bug
14:11:30 <jlibosva> we can discuss on review or LP :)
14:11:39 <ajo> Is anything missing on my current patch?
14:11:44 <ajo> commit message ok
14:12:21 <jlibosva> ajo: ihrachys has -1 due to closing the bug
14:12:31 <ajo> jlibosva just published an edit, thanks :)
14:12:39 <jlibosva> ok, moving on
14:12:43 <jlibosva> thanks ajo :)
14:12:56 <jlibosva> Other than that, I don't see any critical bugs
14:13:03 <jlibosva> Bug deputy for last week was dasanind - he sent a report to ML, good job
14:13:13 <dasanind> jlibosva: thank you
14:13:31 <jlibosva> dasanind: oh, you're around, good :) Do you want to update here?
14:13:35 <dasanind> sure
14:13:54 <dasanind> there were approximately 25 bugs last week
14:14:07 <dasanind> I was unable to triage 2 of them :(
14:14:15 <dasanind> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1672345
14:14:16 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1672345 in neutron "Loadbalancer V2 ports are not serviced by DVR" [Undecided,New]
14:14:21 <dasanind> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1672433
14:14:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1672433 in neutron "dhcp-agent should send a grace ARP after assigning IP address in dhcp namespace" [Undecided,New]
14:14:39 <dasanind> In addition to these there were couple of RFEs
14:15:09 <ihrachys> the last one is quite interesting. seems like we may want to send garps for dhcp ports too. the use case is a bit blurry and debatable, but ping should work anyhow.
14:16:31 <dasanind> also there was an old bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1629097
14:16:31 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1629097 in neutron "neutron-rootwrap processes not getting cleaned up" [Undecided,Confirmed]
14:17:29 <dasanind> That's all I had for the bug deputy report :)
14:18:15 <jlibosva> dasanind: thanks for good work :)
14:18:42 <dasanind> jlibosva: thank you
14:18:53 <jlibosva> seems like the first one might be a duplicate, would be worth to get feedback from assignee of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1583694 to confirm
14:18:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1583694 in neutron "[RFE] DVR support for Allowed_address_pair port that are bound to multiple ACTIVE VM ports" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan)
14:19:38 <jlibosva> anybody else has any other bug worth highlighting here?
14:20:33 <jlibosva> ok, moving on
14:20:40 <jlibosva> sindhu is bug deputy for this week
14:20:46 <jlibosva> and we need a volunteer for next week :)
14:21:03 <sindhu> jlibosva: yes :)
14:21:30 <ihrachys> I can do next
14:21:34 <jlibosva> ihrachys: thanks
14:21:56 <jlibosva> #info ihrachys bug deputy for week Mar 20th
14:22:14 <jlibosva> #topic Docs
14:22:26 <jlibosva> I saw john-davidge waving at the beginning of the meeting :)
14:22:40 <jlibosva> john-davidge: do you want to give any updates?
14:24:20 <jlibosva> ok, looks like he's not behind keyboard
14:25:12 <jlibosva> we can get back the topic after OSC if amotoki wants to give any updates? :)
14:25:47 <amotoki> are we changing the topic?
14:25:51 <jlibosva> #topic Transition to OSC
14:25:53 <jlibosva> yes :)
14:25:57 <amotoki> :)
14:26:29 <amotoki> no new patch landed last week related to neutron in OSC, but several patches are near to merge.
14:26:40 <amotoki> it is a good news.
14:26:48 <amotoki> I have one thing to note.
14:27:12 <reedip> o/
14:27:22 <amotoki> Filtering of OSC networking "list" commands does not work correctly due to the lack of openstacksdk support.
14:27:43 <amotoki> I will track the progress of the filtering feature later this week.
14:28:27 <amotoki> in addition to that, some patches to neutron OSC plugins are proposed reagridng stadium inclusion.
14:28:40 <amotoki> if you have some, add me to a reviewer.
14:28:46 <amotoki> that's all from me.
14:29:01 <ihrachys> re filtering, you mean users can't scope requests?
14:29:34 <amotoki> what i mean is like 'neutron port-list --network-id <net-id>' or something.
14:29:41 <jlibosva> amotoki: is there a LP bug for sdk?
14:29:53 <ihrachys> yeah. so everything always returned?
14:29:56 <amotoki> jlibosva: I am searching it.....
14:30:08 <amotoki> ihrachys: yeah, all are returned :(
14:30:14 <ihrachys> meh
14:30:21 <amotoki> openstack network list --external returns all :(
14:30:32 <hoangcx> "neutron OSC plugins are proposed reagridng stadium inclusion" => https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439978/
14:30:53 <amotoki> hoangcx: VPNaaS is one of them
14:31:21 <hoangcx> amotoki, yes. Thank you for your review
14:31:55 <reedip> amotoki : added :)
14:32:35 <amotoki> does anyone know octavia folks are implementing their OSC plugin? If not I will ask them
14:32:56 <dasm> amotoki: i think some work is going on, thanks to sindhu and ankur-gupta-f1
14:33:43 <amotoki> dasm: thanks. I was not aware of it.
14:34:52 <amotoki> if nothing, let's move on
14:35:01 <jlibosva> amotoki: ok, thanks for updates
14:35:06 <dasm> amotoki: i've double checked. sindhu didn't start her work, but ankur-gupta-f1 has something,. they still waiting for v2 for octavia
14:35:29 <bzhao> amotoki, no, I found nothing. And last meeting of ocavia, there is nothing about osc..
14:36:02 <reedip> amotoki : ankur posted a patch for octavia
14:36:26 <reedip> oh , just saw the other messages, thanks dasm
14:36:31 <amotoki> okay, it looks better to sync their plan on CLI on the progress with octavia. thanks for the input.
14:36:37 <amotoki> plan and progress.
14:37:01 <dasm> amotoki: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428414/
14:37:33 <jlibosva> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439978/
14:37:41 <jlibosva> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428414/
14:38:46 <jlibosva> amotoki: re openstacksdk bug - is network the only resource that can't be filtered?
14:39:31 <amotoki> jlibosva: I think no. I haven't checked all, but the comment says it does not support query....
14:39:39 <youzp> #topic specs
14:40:05 <jlibosva> so it sounds to me that not only Neutron might be affected
14:40:38 <jlibosva> ok, thanks all for osc updates
14:40:53 <ankur-gupta-f4> Sorry im late :(
14:40:54 <amotoki> you're welcome.
14:40:57 <jlibosva> let's move to neutron-lib unless there is still something related to osc to discuss
14:41:37 <boden> hi, I can provide a quick neutron-lib summary if we’re done with OSC
14:41:40 <jlibosva> #topic Neutron-lib and planned neutron refactoring
14:41:42 <john-davidge> jlibosva: Sorry about that, had to step away from keyboard for a few minutes
14:41:51 <jlibosva> boden: thanks:) go ahead
14:42:05 <jlibosva> john-davidge: no problem, we can get back Docs after neutron-lib, if that's fine
14:42:15 <john-davidge> jlibosva: Sure :)
14:42:24 <boden> last week we discussed a new lib release.. we have a release patch proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445483/
14:42:52 <boden> as noted; there are 2 other patches I was hoping we could pick up for the release; so hopefully we can close on those in the next day or few
14:43:20 <ihrachys> boden: no links to patches
14:43:30 <ihrachys> oh there is one
14:43:34 <ihrachys> not another though
14:43:47 <boden> ihrachys: yes the other is still under dev in my workspace
14:44:05 <boden> if we need a release of lib today; we can go ahead without them, but if no rush it would be helpful to wait
14:44:37 <jlibosva> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442763/
14:44:45 <jlibosva> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445483
14:45:08 <ihrachys> boden: is it something user visible?
14:45:18 <ihrachys> because e.g. doc update does not merit a release blocker
14:45:52 <boden> ihrachys: true, but it clarifies our pep8/hacking check process which will now be “live” for all consumers
14:46:07 <boden> is there a rush to release lib, are people waiting on something in the release?
14:46:27 <amotoki> i think docs.o.o/developer/neutron-lib is published from the released version.
14:46:50 <amotoki> woops... i am wrong..
14:47:19 <dasm> amotoki: nope. it's published with every change
14:47:36 <ihrachys> not me, I don't wait on it, but would be nice to get e.g. callbacks earlier
14:49:00 <boden> ihrachys: the patch I’m working on and would like to get in makes neutron-lib api-def consumption work… but again it could wait for the next release if needed
14:49:41 <boden> in any case; we can move forward with the release with or without my patches… last time checked the periodic gate was green
14:50:06 <dasm> ditto. both neutron-lib and neutron periodics are green
14:50:15 <jlibosva> Maybe we can discuss on the docs update in 445483 change?
14:50:25 <boden> sure
14:50:26 <ihrachys> +
14:50:31 <boden> that’s all I have for lib
14:50:43 <jlibosva> boden: alright, thanks for update and bringing up the discussion
14:50:51 <jlibosva> #topic Docs
14:50:56 <jlibosva> john-davidge: hi :)
14:50:57 <john-davidge> jlibosva: Hi
14:51:51 <john-davidge> We had a large number of patches merge for the RFC 5737 fix this week. Thanks especially to caoyuan for the chnages
14:52:51 <john-davidge> There is also a lot of activity on moving documented neutron client commands to OSC. I'd like to remind contributors to make sure the output is being updated as well as the input where neccessary.
14:53:25 <john-davidge> Those are the only major points from me this week, thanks
14:53:41 <jlibosva> john-davidge: thanks!
14:53:56 <jlibosva> any comments anybody for docs?
14:54:38 <jlibosva> ok, moving to open discussion, we have 5 mins
14:54:42 <jlibosva> #topic Open discussion
14:54:53 <annp> Hi jlibosva and everyone
14:54:59 <jlibosva> There are no new topics in On Demand Agenda
14:55:02 <jlibosva> annp: hi :)
14:55:10 <annp> We have updated logging api spec (#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509) and also uploaded our implementation for OVS firewall driver logging (#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396104/).
14:55:21 <annp> Could you please take a look on this and leave your comments?
14:55:39 <annp> Thank you :)
14:55:59 <ihrachys> the prev drivers meeting, we discussed that a tad, and I think the only thing to decide is whether we want to wait for ml2 framework for binding validation before allowing that in
14:56:04 <jlibosva> I promised at PTG that I'm gonna have a look :)
14:56:26 <ihrachys> kevinbenton was for not waiting, but wanted to check with rkukura first
14:56:38 <annp> jlibosva: Thanks :)
14:56:43 <ihrachys> I think we should have some go-decision this week
14:57:00 <jlibosva> ihrachys: the drivers meeting is on Thu?
14:57:03 <ihrachys> yes
14:57:23 <ihrachys> log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-03-09-22.00.log.html
14:57:42 <ihrachys> 22:09:53+
14:58:01 <ihrachys> in unrelated news, would be nice to see progress on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:new-neutron-devstack-in-gate
14:58:16 <ihrachys> some bits are devstack controlled so not much we can do, but there are some small bits on neutron side
14:58:20 <ihrachys> so reviews welcome
14:59:05 <jlibosva> annp: thanks for bringing up the SG logging API - seems like it's on radar
14:59:06 <annp> ihrachys: I got it. thanks for your information.
14:59:10 <john-davidge> ihrachys: Any movement on approval of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1667329 in drivers meeting?
14:59:10 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1667329 in neutron "[RFE] Floating IP Subnets on Routed Provider Networks" [Undecided,Triaged]
14:59:16 <jlibosva> ihrachys: thanks for the link - I'll try to go through the open changes
14:59:27 <ihrachys> john-davidge: it was not discussed
15:00:00 <john-davidge> ihrachys: Ok, thanks
15:00:03 <jlibosva> we're out of time
15:00:08 <jlibosva> thanks everybody for showing up :)
15:00:13 <dasanind> thanks
15:00:19 <jlibosva> #endmeeting