14:01:11 <mlavalle> #startmeeting networking
14:01:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 31 14:01:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:14 <annp_> hi
14:01:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:01:16 <njohnston> o/
14:01:23 <bcafarel> o/
14:01:24 <mlavalle> Hey there!
14:01:26 <haleyb> hi
14:01:32 <slaweq> hi
14:01:35 <boden> howdy
14:01:46 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
14:02:28 <mlavalle> We reached Rocky 3 last week. We are currently working on our rc-1
14:02:54 <mlavalle> later, in the blueprints section, we will review the blueprints that we are targeting for rc-1
14:03:50 <mlavalle> Today (Jul 31, 2018 23:45 UTC) the community will close the PTL nomination period
14:04:17 <mlavalle> Here you can find the current nominations: https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-your-candidacy
14:04:17 <rubasov> o/
14:04:37 <mlavalle> yours truly is running for Neutron PTL
14:04:54 <rbanerje> o/
14:05:18 <njohnston> mlavalle++
14:05:44 <DeepakT_> how can I join the neutron meeting currently underway?
14:05:47 <annp_> mlavalle+100
14:06:17 <mlavalle> Thanks :-)
14:06:24 <mlavalle> and the Denver PTG will take place on September 10 - 14 in Denver
14:06:32 <rubasov> DeepakT_: you're already in it
14:06:44 <DeepakT_> ok, so thr is no bridge
14:06:45 <slaweq> yes, mlavalle for president (or PTL)!
14:06:52 <mlavalle> It seems this will be the last PTG
14:06:54 <njohnston> DeepakT_: This is the meeting already in progress.  There is no video or audio component, if that is what you are thinking.
14:07:03 <DeepakT_> ok, thanks
14:07:32 <mlavalle> we will move back to the previous Summit format
14:07:54 <mlavalle> I hope to see many of you in Denver!
14:08:01 <DeepakT_> I wud like to discuss an agenda item today related to Tap-as-a-service
14:08:20 <mlavalle> Later this week I will start the etherpad
14:08:41 <mlavalle> DeepakT_: let's discuss it at the end of the meeting, in the Open Agenda section
14:08:46 <DeepakT_> ok
14:09:15 <DeepakT_> I m joining for the first time, pls bear with me as I am not aware of the rules and regulations
14:09:25 <mlavalle> no problem
14:09:36 <mlavalle> Any other announcements from the team?
14:10:14 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
14:10:21 <mlavalle> #topic Blueprints
14:11:02 <mlavalle> As I mentioned before, this week we are working in our RC-1
14:11:25 <mlavalle> which I am hoping to cut by the end of this week
14:11:47 <mlavalle> This is what we are targeting for the rc-1: https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/rocky-rc1
14:11:47 <annp_> mlavalle +1
14:12:58 <annp_> mlavalle, Regards to logging for firewall, we need your blessing for  3 patches except docs patch in RC1 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bug/1720727 We really need 3 patches in RC1 before logging patches in neutron-fwaas is getting merge.
14:13:37 <mlavalle> annp_: yes, I am looking at those patches
14:13:53 <mlavalle> I will go go thorugh them today and tomorrow
14:14:01 <annp_> slawek, njohnston: thanks for your great reviewing on logging patches. :)
14:14:25 <annp_> mlavalle, thanks a ton! :)
14:14:57 <mlavalle> annp_: as far as wsgi suppprt we only need to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584257/, right?
14:16:19 <mlavalle> I will take that as a yes
14:16:20 <annp_> mlavalle, right. But we still need to get merge devstack's patch : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473718/
14:16:38 <mlavalle> annp_: I know, I'll bug them later today
14:16:54 <mlavalle> but from the Neutron perspective we are only missing the doc
14:17:06 <annp_> mlavalle and I need some investigate your concerning aslo.
14:17:19 <mlavalle> no rush on that
14:17:32 <annp_> mlavalle, thanks!
14:17:49 <mlavalle> The other blueprint that we are targeting is https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/port_forwarding+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:17:50 <annp_> mlavalle, that's all from me.  please go ahead.
14:18:13 <mlavalle> As you can see, we are in pretty good shape there
14:18:32 <manjeets_> ++
14:18:54 <mlavalle> haleyb: zhaobo responded to your comments here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574673/
14:19:05 <mlavalle> would you take a look and see what you think?
14:19:14 <haleyb> mlavalle: yes, i'll take a look, thanks
14:20:21 <mlavalle> He also responded to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585731
14:20:33 <mlavalle> but I don't think he pushed the revision, did he?
14:20:45 <haleyb> no, i don't see any new revisions
14:21:04 * mlavalle pinging him
14:22:10 <mlavalle> well, let's see if he is still awake
14:22:59 <mlavalle> I am asking the core reviewers not to merger any patches until we finish with rc-1
14:23:17 <mlavalle> to keep the gate wide open
14:23:39 <mlavalle> in the past we have put -2 in patches not included in the release candidate
14:23:47 <mlavalle> I am not going to do it this time around
14:24:05 <haleyb> ack, was just going to ask about the -2
14:24:20 <mlavalle> I think we have a very disciplined team so it is not necessary
14:24:43 <slaweq> ok
14:25:50 <mlavalle> anything else we should discuss about rc-1?
14:26:36 <bcafarel> for stadium, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584873/ has green everywhere for networking-sfc
14:27:21 <mlavalle> bcafarel: thanks for bringing it up. I will take a look at it and encourage other revieiwers to do the same
14:27:26 <boden> also I will mentioned https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585559/ which is part of live-migration-portbinding, but is not critical for the release
14:28:55 <mlavalle> this one is not a big deal and I think itis a good idea to switch to consume this function from neutron-lib before we generate technical debt with other Stadium projects
14:29:13 <mlavalle> haleyb, slaweq: would you take a look at it
14:29:18 <mlavalle> ?
14:29:29 <rtang> #openstack-helm
14:29:36 <rtang> oops
14:30:07 <slaweq> mlavalle: sure, I will look today
14:30:08 <haleyb> boden: i'll take a look
14:30:16 <boden> cool thanks haleyb
14:30:20 <mlavalle> Thanks!
14:30:40 <mlavalle> ok, moving on
14:30:56 <mlavalle> #topic Community goals
14:31:03 <mlavalle> we already talked about wsgi
14:31:21 <mlavalle> njohnston: anyhting to report on Python 3?
14:31:48 <njohnston> The py35 fullstack job looks stable, and has been moved from the experimental queue to the check queue.  It is still non-voting, we can assess it's voting status once we get past Rocky
14:32:15 <mlavalle> thanks you for doing that
14:32:15 <njohnston> The py35 functional job still has a number of string parsing errors; I am trying to run those down.  http://logs.openstack.org/50/580450/2/experimental/neutron-functional-python35/f8aad48/logs/testr_results.html.gz
14:33:00 <njohnston> I'm not sure what the "subunit.parser" error portends but I am hoping there are just opne or two deeply embedded issues that need to be tracked and fixed.
14:33:44 <bcafarel> yes from what I have seen the other tests reported as failed are mostly a side effect of the subunit.parser one
14:34:21 <njohnston> I think that with luck we are on track to make both jobs voting at the start of the S cycle, which would conclude the python 3 goal IIUC
14:34:38 <bcafarel> next step, tempest? ;)
14:35:48 <mlavalle> it would be great if we can be ahead of the community with his goal
14:36:03 <njohnston> ah yes, tempest.  yes, that will be next.
14:36:09 <mlavalle> cool
14:36:18 <mlavalle> thanks for the update
14:36:23 <mlavalle> let's move on
14:36:26 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
14:37:32 <mlavalle> Last week's bugs deputy was Yamamoto. He sent a report here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/132599.html
14:38:38 <mlavalle> The only high priority one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783306
14:38:39 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1783306 in neutron "Invalid auth url" [High,In progress]
14:38:51 <mlavalle> and it seems is a docs issue
14:39:13 <mlavalle> If nobody wants it, I'll work on it
14:39:17 <mlavalle> any takers?
14:39:36 <slaweq> there is patch for it already I think
14:39:39 <slaweq> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571384/
14:40:04 <mlavalle> a perfect
14:40:19 <slaweq> it needs only Your +2 :)
14:40:48 <bcafarel> and a Closes-Bug?
14:41:28 <mlavalle> The other two bugs that I want to highlight are https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783470
14:41:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1783470 in neutron "get_subnet_for_dvr returns SNAT mac instead of gateway in subnet_info" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Arjun Baindur (abaindur)
14:41:40 <mlavalle> and https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783654
14:41:41 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1783654 in neutron "DVR process flow not installed on physical bridge for shared tenant network" [Undecided,New]
14:42:04 <mlavalle> yamamoto couldn't triage them. I will take a pass at them
14:42:23 <mlavalle> if I get in toruble I'll bug haleyb ;-)
14:42:46 <haleyb> yes, he had sent me an email but i just saw it last night
14:43:08 <mlavalle> let's work them over the next few days
14:43:26 <mlavalle> any other bugs we should discuss today
14:43:28 <mlavalle> ?
14:44:11 <mlavalle> ok
14:44:21 <mlavalle> This week, yours truly is the bugs deputy
14:44:54 <mlavalle> Please note that it is time to rollover the calendar, which I will do today
14:45:07 <mlavalle> don't forget to look at your next duty date
14:45:22 <mlavalle> #topic neutron-lib
14:45:35 <mlavalle> boden anything we should discuss on this topic?
14:45:43 <boden> hi. just very quickly
14:46:28 <boden> I’ll assume no body has heard of any issues with neutron-lib 1.18.0 (stable/rocky)?? I haven’t yet, so I’ll hope we are good with this version (so far)
14:46:57 <mlavalle> I am good so far :-)
14:47:12 <mlavalle> haven't heard anything
14:47:31 <mlavalle> let's not jinx it and leave it at that
14:47:34 <mlavalle> ;-)
14:47:34 <boden> and just a reminder that once we get rocky out we can begin to merge py code into neutron-lib as usual… but for now I’ve been holding off just in case we might need to cut a new rocky release
14:47:47 <boden> that’s all I have
14:48:15 <mlavalle> thanks for holding the neutron-lib fort for us!
14:48:35 <mlavalle> #topic Docs
14:48:48 <mlavalle> anything to say about docs?
14:49:39 <mlavalle> I'd say no, so let's move on
14:49:43 <boden> I don’t have anything…
14:49:49 <manjeets_> seems like docs are perfect :)
14:49:53 <mlavalle> #topic Open Agenda
14:50:08 <mlavalle> DeepakT: the microphone is all yours
14:50:19 <DeepakT> thanks mlavalle
14:51:03 <DeepakT> I was working on adding sriov driver to neutron-taas
14:51:05 <DeepakT> I seek to deploy it with openstack-helm
14:51:18 <DeepakT> which only supports ocata release as of now
14:51:34 <DeepakT> so I am doing changes for both ocata as well as master branch
14:51:59 <mlavalle> those change are in what repo?
14:52:06 <mlavalle> changes^^^^
14:52:13 <manjeets_> tap-as-a-service
14:52:15 <DeepakT> now the main diff between the two branches is that in master branch agent is an L2 extension
14:52:16 <rbanerje> hey DeepakT_ is there any patch for the SRIOV support for TaaS ?
14:52:33 <DeepakT> tap-as-a-service
14:52:39 <DeepakT> yes
14:52:45 <DeepakT> I hv committed a patch
14:53:05 <DeepakT> while in ocata branch agent runs as an independent process
14:53:08 <rbanerje> AFAIK , TaaS would be L2 Agent extension only.
14:53:42 <DeepakT> so I would like to propose to backport the change to make agent as L2 extension from master branch to ocata branch
14:54:00 <DeepakT> yes, but its not like that in ocata branch
14:54:03 <rbanerje> but Tap-as-a-Service is not a part of the Neutron Stadium, IIUC
14:54:17 <mlavalle> no, it is not
14:54:35 <DeepakT> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584514/
14:54:47 <rbanerje> there are some missing items in there , some of which were assigned to me , but due to other commitments, missed them .
14:54:47 <DeepakT> here is the patch in a very prilimnary stage
14:55:18 <DeepakT> so I would like the community to give a go ahead to backport those changes in ocata branch
14:56:02 <mlavalle> There are two things to mention here:
14:56:26 <rbanerje> Tap-as-a-Service is a different project, and if I am correct, without a Project Lead ( PTL ) because Anil Rao left
14:56:46 <mlavalle> 1) I see it very difficult that we can merge new functionality into a stable branch. That is why they are stable. Besides, Ocata is not supported anymore
14:57:04 <mlavalle> 2) like rbanerje said
14:57:33 <mlavalle> so let's take this conversation to the channel
14:57:46 <mlavalle> I will try to find someone who can help TaaS
14:57:57 <manjeets_> yamamoto, ^^
14:57:58 <mlavalle> for the time being, there is little we can do in this meeting
14:57:58 <DeepakT> is there a dedicated channel for TaaS?
14:58:08 <rbanerje> yamamoto can be a great mentor
14:58:21 <rbanerje> DeepakT, the meeting for TaaS is on Wednesday 11:00 AM IST
14:58:28 <mlavalle> ok, I will talk to yamamoto
14:58:31 <DeepakT> ok
14:58:37 <rbanerje> there is no separate channel for Tap-as-a-Service
14:58:41 <DeepakT> wud it be same channel here?
14:58:47 <DeepakT> Openstack-meeting
14:58:51 <mlavalle> Thanks for attending
14:58:55 <DeepakT> ok
14:58:59 <mlavalle> #endmeeting