21:00:23 <mlavalle> #startmeeting networking 21:00:24 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Oct 15 21:00:23 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:26 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:28 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:00:50 <hongbin> o/ 21:00:53 <njohnston> o/ 21:00:55 <manjeets> hi 21:02:16 <mlavalle> Agenda for today's meeting is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings 21:02:31 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements 21:02:57 <slaweq> hi 21:03:28 <mlavalle> We are one week away form the Stein-1 milestone 21:03:39 <mlavalle> October 22nd - 26th 21:04:26 <mlavalle> and Fall weather hit suddenly in Central Texas: 40F (~6C) with rain and wind 21:04:48 <boden> that's warm! 21:05:05 <slaweq> first time it's warmer in my place than in Texas :D 21:05:22 <haleyb> here too :) 21:05:31 <mlavalle> well last night we were at 81F (27C) 21:06:01 <boden> we had 18F high and snow yesterday... totally skipped fall in the Rocky Mountains 21:06:21 <mlavalle> I also want to congratulate bcafarel, who was confirmed as Neutron stable core last week 21:06:30 <njohnston> huzzah! 21:06:38 <slaweq> +1 21:06:39 <mlavalle> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-October/135595.html 21:06:50 <slaweq> congrats bcafarel :) 21:06:58 <manjeets> ++ congrats bcafarel :) 21:07:12 <mlavalle> so, bcafarel please go ahead and use your super powers in stable branches 21:08:13 <mlavalle> Finally, please remember that we are less than a month away from the Summit in Berlin 21:08:34 <mlavalle> any other announcements? 21:09:16 <mlavalle> #topic Blueprints 21:09:54 <mlavalle> These are the blueprints that we are tracking for Stein-1: 21:10:01 <mlavalle> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/stein-1 21:10:30 <mlavalle> any updates for these blueprints? 21:11:36 <njohnston> nothing from me at this point 21:12:07 <mlavalle> I want to point out that for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-gateway-ip-qos 21:12:43 <mlavalle> we have server side patch https://review.openstack.org/424468 21:13:03 <mlavalle> and agent side patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568526/ 21:13:09 <mlavalle> ready for review 21:13:38 <mlavalle> please take a look if you have a chance 21:13:52 <slaweq> sure, I have it my pile 21:15:21 <mlavalle> and also https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/strict-minimum-bandwidth-support 21:15:35 <njohnston> I have that one in my pile :-) 21:15:51 <mlavalle> They have a good number of patches under review: 21:15:57 <mlavalle> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:minimum-bandwidth-allocation-placement-api 21:16:25 <manjeets> some of them are in good shape actually 21:16:32 <mlavalle> yes 21:16:43 <mlavalle> they are making good progress 21:17:04 <mlavalle> They are very busy in Budapest 21:17:30 <mlavalle> any other blueprints we should discuss today? 21:18:03 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on 21:18:13 <mlavalle> #topic Community goals 21:18:42 <mlavalle> it is probably too early in the morning for amotoki. so let's skip policy in code 21:18:59 <mlavalle> njohnston: any updates on Python 3 adoption? 21:19:26 <njohnston> Nothing I recall at the moment. My apologies, I just got back from chaperoning my daughter's field trip. 21:19:40 <mlavalle> ahhh, cool 21:19:56 <mlavalle> daughters override almost anything.... 21:20:04 <mlavalle> except wives 21:21:05 <mlavalle> slaweq: any updates with pre upgrade chacks? 21:21:10 <mlavalle> checks^^^^ 21:21:14 <slaweq> yes 21:21:18 <slaweq> I made some progress with it 21:21:29 <slaweq> oslo.upgradecheck is now released as 0.1.0 version 21:21:39 <slaweq> and it's in openstack/requirements repo alread 21:21:42 <slaweq> *already 21:21:49 <slaweq> so I updated my patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608444/ 21:21:56 <slaweq> I think it's ready for review now 21:22:04 <slaweq> mriedem gave +1 already on it 21:22:23 <slaweq> when this will be done we can thing about adding some "real" checks to it 21:22:48 <mlavalle> wow, mriedem is a tough reviewer, so it must be perfect, or close to it 21:23:07 <slaweq> mlavalle: it is very "easy" patch :) 21:23:41 <mriedem> mlavalle: don't worry i had already -1ed it earlier 21:24:09 <mlavalle> mriedem: I was sure of that, without seeing 21:24:14 <mlavalle> LOL 21:24:43 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on 21:24:54 <mlavalle> thanks for the update and the hard work slaweq 21:25:08 <slaweq> You welcome :) 21:25:40 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs 21:26:04 <mlavalle> Our deputy last week was slaweq \. Thanks! 21:26:17 <mlavalle> He sent this thorough report: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-October/135738.html 21:26:46 <mlavalle> I was looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795432 21:26:47 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1795432 in neutron "neutron does not create the necessary iptables rules for dhcp agents when linuxbridge is used " [Undecided,New] 21:26:52 <clarkb> Not sure if this is the right meeting topic for it, but neutron-functional is at the top of the list at http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html 21:27:42 <slaweq> clarkb: in most (or even all) cases it's the same issue and fix is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610003/ 21:27:46 <mlavalle> clarkb: it is a proper forum. We will look at it 21:28:25 <mlavalle> clarkb: and we will revisit it anyway tomorrow during the Neutrin CI meeting 21:28:33 <clarkb> slaweq: ok, we should see neutron-functional rotate out of that list over the next 10 days once that merges 21:28:45 <slaweq> clarkb: I hope so :) 21:29:14 <mlavalle> ok, going back to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795432 21:29:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1795432 in neutron "neutron does not create the necessary iptables rules for dhcp agents when linuxbridge is used " [Undecided,New] 21:29:38 <mlavalle> I was looking at it. I have an environment where I can reproduce 21:29:48 <mlavalle> try to reproduce that is 21:30:37 <mlavalle> although I have to say that during the development of multiple port bindings I tested with linuxbridge 21:30:57 <mlavalle> and didn't experience problems. I was getting DHCP service without a problem 21:31:06 <mlavalle> That was Rocky, though 21:31:14 <mlavalle> and the bug seems to be Queens 21:31:20 <mlavalle> so I will dig deeper 21:31:25 <slaweq> thx mlavalle :) 21:32:18 <mlavalle> As for https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795816, I was wondering if tidwelr was around 21:32:18 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1795816 in neutron "neutron_dynamic_routing Bgp floatingip_update KeyError: 'last_known_router_id'" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Ryan Tidwell (ryan-tidwell) 21:32:24 <mlavalle> but he is not 21:32:50 <mlavalle> so I will take the action item to ping him and see if he can help us triaging it 21:33:12 <slaweq> I think he already started that in bug comments :) 21:33:46 <mlavalle> slaweq: ah that's great 21:34:11 <mlavalle> does anybody want to help triaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1797368 21:34:11 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1797368 in neutron "Trunk: different behavior of admin_state_up attribute between trunk and port" [Undecided,New] 21:34:12 <slaweq> he even wrote that he was able to reproduce it on master 21:35:40 <mlavalle> as for the two RFEs, I already started discussing with the submitters in the respective bugs 21:36:05 <mlavalle> so they are being processed in the RFEs pipeline 21:36:25 <mlavalle> and the potential RFE, I will take a look after the meeting 21:36:31 <slaweq> thx mlavalle 21:36:43 <mlavalle> any other bugs we should discuss today? 21:36:58 <slaweq> not from me :) 21:37:25 <mlavalle> ok 21:37:35 <mlavalle> our bugs deputy this week is haleyb 21:37:46 <mlavalle> and next week armax is on the hook 21:37:48 <haleyb> yes, ready for action 21:38:03 * mlavalle already talked to him and he is glad to do his deputy duty next week 21:38:05 <armax> for duty 21:38:23 <slaweq> hi armax :) 21:38:25 <mlavalle> armax: correct, for deputy duty :-) 21:38:38 <armax> I’ll take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1797368 21:38:38 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1797368 in neutron "Trunk: different behavior of admin_state_up attribute between trunk and port" [Undecided,New] 21:38:48 <mlavalle> armax: thanks! 21:39:12 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on 21:39:20 <mlavalle> #topic neutron-lib 21:39:30 <mlavalle> boden: you are up 21:39:33 <boden> hi 21:39:41 <boden> I only have 1 topic to bring up 21:40:06 <boden> I've started reviving the "use neutron-lib callback payload" patches; we've been dragging them around for awhile now 21:40:28 <boden> a number of them will required depends-on, having the stars aligned, etc.. and are not quite ready yet 21:40:35 <boden> but there are 2 that can land 21:40:43 <boden> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597227/ 21:40:50 <boden> and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596959/ 21:41:01 <boden> if folks get time to peek, it might help the effort 21:41:15 <boden> that's all I have, unless others have something to add 21:41:44 <mlavalle> boden: the first one, I just pushed it over the edge 21:42:11 <mlavalle> for the second one I'll take a look again tomorrow 21:42:23 <boden> thanks... and I will try to align the others so we can get them flowing... still many left to go 21:42:37 <mlavalle> ack 21:42:54 <mlavalle> moving on 21:43:00 <mlavalle> #topic os-ken 21:43:14 <mlavalle> hongbin: you are up 21:43:26 <hongbin> hi 21:44:09 <hongbin> so, right now, we had a proposal to include os-ken in global requirement 21:44:14 <hongbin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609018/ 21:44:29 <hongbin> we had the initial feedback in the patch 21:44:54 <mlavalle> yeap 21:45:03 <mlavalle> it is good progress, though 21:45:18 <hongbin> in particular, the feedback is to add more testing in the repo 21:45:33 <hongbin> and add the doc building / release note jobs 21:45:48 <hongbin> i am addressing the comments this week 21:45:54 <hongbin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-ken 21:46:04 <mlavalle> that's great. thanks! 21:46:27 <toshiiw> thanks 21:46:32 <hongbin> after those patches are merged, i will respin the requirement patch 21:47:03 <hongbin> mlavalle: that is all i wanted to share this week 21:47:16 <mlavalle> hongbin: thanks for the update 21:47:23 <hongbin> mlavalle: np 21:47:47 <mlavalle> haleyb, slaweq: if you click in any of the patches in https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-ken... 21:47:58 <mlavalle> do you have +2 powers there? 21:48:07 <slaweq> yes 21:48:09 <slaweq> I have 21:48:16 <mlavalle> ok, cool 21:48:20 <haleyb> i do too 21:48:24 <mlavalle> we have what we need to move forward 21:48:38 <slaweq> I will go through this list of patches tomorrow 21:48:48 <hongbin> thanks 21:49:21 <mlavalle> moving on.... 21:49:35 <mlavalle> #topic On demand agenda 21:49:47 <mlavalle> Anything else we should discuss today? 21:50:01 <toshiiw> yup 21:50:08 <toshiiw> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/599496/ 21:50:11 <mlavalle> go ahead toshiiw 21:50:31 <toshiiw> the patch is to drop the old ovs-ofctl code 21:50:51 <toshiiw> but as you see in the comments, there's some hurdle doing this 21:51:26 <toshiiw> it'll make our future maintenance a bit easier 21:53:00 <toshiiw> please note i'll only have a limited time for this patch (same as ryu, i think) 21:53:21 <mlavalle> you left a comment in note #41 21:53:37 <mlavalle> is answering that question the next step? 21:53:42 <mlavalle> toshiiw: ^^^^ 21:54:21 <toshiiw> which is #41? 21:54:41 <mlavalle> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1697243/comments/41 21:54:41 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1697243 in neutron "ovs bridge flow table is dropped by unkown cause" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Arjun Baindur (abaindur) 21:56:22 <toshiiw> I haven't read the bug in detail but does it contain enough info to reproduce? 21:56:52 <mlavalle> That I don't know, I was hoping you knew what the next step is 21:57:05 <mlavalle> I will read the bug slowly later and leave my comments there 21:57:10 <toshiiw> the other bug by amotoki is due to ovs and probably unfixable 21:57:37 <toshiiw> i'll check 1697243 later when i have time 21:58:04 <mlavalle> ok, THanks for bringing this up! 21:58:17 <mlavalle> Thanks for attending 21:58:18 <toshiiw> IMO this patch is not something welcome later in a release cycle 21:58:31 <mlavalle> Have a nice week! 21:58:32 <toshiiw> have a good day 21:58:36 <mlavalle> toshiiw: agree! 21:58:50 <mlavalle> #endmeeting