21:00:28 <mlavalle> #startmeeting networking
21:00:29 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar 18 21:00:28 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
21:00:52 <mlavalle> Hi there!
21:00:56 <dougwig> o/
21:01:14 <slaweq> hi
21:01:27 <bcafarel> o/
21:02:55 <mlavalle> ok, let's get going
21:03:05 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
21:04:26 <mlavalle> Last week closed the PTL slef nomination period. The only candidate for Neutron was your truly: https://github.com/openstack/election/tree/master/candidates/train/Neutron
21:04:48 <mlavalle> So I'm afraid you will endure me another cycle
21:04:50 <slaweq> \o/
21:05:06 <bcafarel> congratulations, we will endure without a problem!
21:05:10 <slaweq> that is very good news as we already know what we can expect :P
21:05:26 <slaweq> with someone else could be worst :D
21:05:37 <mlavalle> LOL
21:05:41 <slaweq> and seriously: congrats!
21:05:56 <haleyb> hi
21:06:31 <mlavalle> I recently sent a message to the ML reuesting topics for the PTG in Denver: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-March/003895.html
21:06:51 <mlavalle> Here's the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-networking-train-ptg
21:07:54 <mlavalle> and I can see that there are suggestions coming from several of you. Thanks!
21:08:46 <mlavalle> bcafarel: do you want to talk about your message about Pike?
21:09:21 <bcafarel> mlavalle: sure, was looking for the link
21:09:50 <bcafarel> Similar to nova mail, I sent an email about Pike switching to Extended Maintenance soon http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-March/003925.html
21:10:35 <bcafarel> let's get a final Pike release before that, so if you want any backports to get in this release, remember to propose them soon
21:10:43 <mlavalle> thanks bcafarel
21:11:07 <mlavalle> any other announcements from the team?
21:12:00 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
21:12:08 <mlavalle> #topic Blueprints
21:12:43 <mlavalle> This is what we are targeting for RC-1:  https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/stein-rc1
21:13:45 <njohnston> FOr bulk port, over the weekend I addressed your comment mlavalle: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624815/
21:14:37 <mlavalle> thanks njohnston I'll go over it again between today and tomorrow morning
21:14:47 <njohnston> thank you mlavalle!
21:16:05 <mlavalle> njohnston: in fact I just added it to the RC-1 dashboard
21:16:19 <tidwellr> mlavalle: I finished the subnet onboard docs, so we can claim that as complete
21:16:47 <haleyb> mlavalle: since that stein-rc1 link was only bugs, could you add https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641490/ to your queue?  was related to a bug we partially fixed in the l3-agent, https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1813787
21:16:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1813787 in neutron "[L3] DVR router in compute node was not up but nova port needs its functionality" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)
21:18:02 <mlavalle> haleyb: added the bug to the RC-1 dashboard and will look at the patch soon
21:18:13 <haleyb> mlavalle: ack, thanks
21:18:23 <mlavalle> tidwellr: it's merged, right?
21:18:30 <tidwellr> mlavalle: yes
21:19:28 <mlavalle> I had a conversation with rubasov earlier today and he reported several things
21:19:32 <mlavalle> in regards to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1578989
21:19:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1578989 in neutron "[RFE] Strict minimum bandwidth support (egress)" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Bence Romsics (bence-romsics)
21:19:55 <mlavalle> The doc is up for review: https://review.openstack.org/640390
21:20:29 <mlavalle> it already got plenty of feedback
21:20:36 <mlavalle> but still please take a look
21:21:07 <mlavalle> For https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1777627
21:21:08 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777627 in neutron "RFE: QoS – rule's management (set,delete, show…) requires <qos-policy> parameter in addition to <rule-id>" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)
21:21:36 <mlavalle> I recently spent time putting the patch in good shape: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613820
21:22:03 <mlavalle> it had a fullstack failure that doesn't seem to be related
21:22:26 <mlavalle> so I'll recheck it and invite the team to add it to your review queues
21:22:54 <slaweq> yes, this fullstack failure isn't related to Your patch for sure
21:23:37 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1819029
21:23:38 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1819029 in neutron "QoS policies with minimum-bandwidth rule should be rejected on non-physnet ports/networks" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Bence Romsics (bence-romsics)
21:24:32 <mlavalle> rubasov is working on a fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641712/
21:24:57 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795870
21:24:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1795870 in neutron "Trunk scenario test test_trunk_subport_lifecycle fails from time to time" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)
21:25:32 <mlavalle> We merged the fix last week https://review.openstack.org/636710
21:25:59 <mlavalle> and seems to be working
21:26:30 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815618
21:26:32 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1815618 in neutron "cannot update qos rule" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Lajos Katona (lajos-katona)
21:26:45 <mlavalle> we released the fix
21:27:26 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1818224
21:27:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1818224 in neutron "IPv6 forwarding disabled on L3HA routers without gateway" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)
21:28:23 <mlavalle> we released fix
21:28:57 <mlavalle> here's the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640746/
21:29:08 <mlavalle> and I can see that we are backporting as well
21:29:34 <slaweq> yep, only backport to pike is not merged yet
21:29:58 <bcafarel> was checking the backports too :)
21:30:10 <mlavalle> and finally we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1818683
21:30:11 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1818683 in neutron "Placement reporter service plugin sometimes creates orphaned resource providers" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Bence Romsics (bence-romsics)
21:30:36 <mlavalle> In this case the fix was merged on Friday: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641034/
21:31:12 <mlavalle> so all in all I think we are making great progress with our RC-1
21:31:31 <mlavalle> any comments from the team?
21:32:02 <bcafarel> not much except "progress looking good"
21:32:12 <tidwellr> +1
21:32:16 <njohnston> +1
21:32:29 <mlavalle> my patch for QoS alias shlud merge soon
21:32:39 <slaweq> I have one patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643486/
21:32:54 <slaweq> it's new upgrade check related to removal of external_network_bridge option
21:32:55 <mlavalle> and njohnston's looked good to me on Friday, apart form the IPAM call "out of sequence"
21:33:08 <mlavalle> so it should go in soon
21:33:19 <slaweq> I wanted to ask if You think that we should have it in RC1 or can we get it later?
21:33:23 <mlavalle> that leaves the docs from rubasov and a bug he is working on
21:33:44 * mlavalle looking
21:34:53 <mlavalle> slaweq: is the -WIP because of the RC-1?
21:35:10 <slaweq> no, I have to fix some functional tests issue there
21:35:15 <slaweq> but I should do it tomorrow
21:35:51 <mlavalle> slaweq: it doesn't look ajor, so I'm ok with going ahead with it
21:35:57 <mlavalle> major^^^
21:36:03 <mlavalle> any opposition?
21:36:17 <slaweq> mlavalle: thx, yes it's not major thing which may break everything
21:36:40 <slaweq> it's more like "nice-to-have" in upgrade check tool to maybe warn operators which are still using this config option
21:36:48 <bcafarel> and it's nice to make use of that new upgrade check tool
21:37:05 <mlavalle> yeah, I think it's a cherry at the top of the cake
21:37:40 <mlavalle> ok, it's in my pile and ask other reveiwers to keep an eye on it
21:38:00 <slaweq> mlavalle: exactly, thx
21:38:06 <mlavalle> slaweq: is there a bug / RFE we can associate with it?
21:38:26 <mlavalle> I want amotoki to have visibility of it through the dashboard
21:38:36 <slaweq> no, there wasn't bug reported for that
21:38:55 <slaweq> but I can create one quickly if You want
21:39:13 <mlavalle> slaweq: yeah, let's create a bug for this patch
21:39:23 <slaweq> mlavalle: sure, I will do
21:39:30 <mlavalle> and set it's milestone for RC-1
21:39:41 <mlavalle> that way it will show in the dasboard
21:39:46 <mlavalle> slaweq: ^^^^
21:39:53 <slaweq> ok
21:40:44 <mlavalle> anything else on the blueprints / bugs for RC-1?
21:41:42 <mlavalle> ok
21:41:51 <mlavalle> #topic Community goals
21:42:01 <mlavalle> anything to say on Python3?
21:42:32 <slaweq> I don't have anything
21:42:42 <slaweq> maybe njohnston_ have something
21:43:36 <mlavalle> we can talk about it tomorrow during the CI meeting
21:43:51 <slaweq> yes
21:44:11 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
21:44:44 <mlavalle> The bugs deputy last week was yamamoto. I didn't see any report from him
21:44:52 <mlavalle> Did others saw the report?
21:45:13 <slaweq> nope
21:45:25 <mlavalle> ok, let's take a quick look at bugs
21:46:15 <mlavalle> we have this critical confirmed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1819125
21:46:16 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1819125 in neutron "Fullstack test test_min_bw_qos_policy_rule_lifecycle failing often" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)
21:46:25 <mlavalle> but it seems we relased the fix
21:46:46 <slaweq> yes, and that looks fine in gate now
21:47:13 <mlavalle> ralonsoh listed this bug in the commit as related bug
21:47:44 <mlavalle> but it seems this is the fix. So I'll mark it fixed commited
21:48:49 <mlavalle> slaweq: how about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1819160?
21:48:51 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1819160 in neutron "Functional tests for dvr ha routers are broken" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)
21:49:06 <mlavalle> we also commited the fix, didn't we?
21:49:22 <slaweq> nope
21:49:32 <slaweq> for now we only marked those tests as unstable
21:49:47 <mlavalle> ah ok
21:49:55 <slaweq> but IMO those tests have to be rewritten as they aren't testing what they should test
21:50:29 <slaweq> but I think that liuyulong is working on it now
21:50:35 <mlavalle> cool
21:50:54 <mlavalle> I remember now
21:51:23 <mlavalle> There are two or three bugs that need to be triaged
21:51:48 <mlavalle> and since this week your truly is the deputy, I will take care of them
21:52:04 <mlavalle> any other bugs we should discuss today?
21:52:40 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
21:52:46 <mlavalle> #topic On demand agenda
21:52:58 <mlavalle> anything else that should be discussed today?
21:53:53 <mlavalle> ok, thanks for attending
21:53:59 <mlavalle> have a great week!
21:54:08 <mlavalle> o/
21:54:09 <bcafarel> same, o/
21:54:15 <tidwellr> o/
21:54:17 <mlavalle> #endmeeting