21:01:40 #startmeeting networking 21:01:41 Meeting started Mon May 13 21:01:40 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:44 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:01:56 howdy 21:02:02 o/ 21:02:09 o/ 21:02:18 o/ 21:02:44 hey, who collected the beer tabs from the PTG? Have to be sent to haleyb ;-) 21:03:25 :) 21:03:30 wait for his next month's salary he will probably need it :) 21:04:01 bcafarel: you always are so thoughtfull 21:04:25 #topic Announcements 21:04:58 Our next milestone is June 3 - 7, Train 1 21:05:45 Also I wanted to have the PTG summary finished and sent out by now 21:06:02 \But I've been fighting a very bad cold over the past few days 21:06:18 so I've been making very slow progress 21:06:29 I'm half way through it 21:06:42 apologies and expect it over the next 2 or 3 days 21:07:13 any other announcements? 21:07:37 on stable branches, we have final pike releases and -em tag now https://review.opendev.org/#/c/652901/ 21:07:58 so pike officially joined ocata in the extended maintenance wagon :) 21:08:21 thanks bcafarel 21:08:59 ok, moving on 21:09:37 #topic Blueprints 21:10:07 The same as the PTG summary, I've made slow progress updating the Train blueprints 21:10:48 #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/train-1 21:11:09 However, I would like to draw the team's attention to a couple of blueprints 21:11:26 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/smart-nic-ovs 21:11:49 To complete this, we need to merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/586252/ 21:12:24 so please if you have bandwidth, add this patch to your reviews pile 21:13:19 The other one is "Support more than one segment per network per host" 21:13:32 we discussed it in Denver 21:14:16 and wwriverrat agreed to write a spec. He already posted the first version: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657170/ 21:14:33 mlavalle: Ihave found that on master (perhaps from rocky) routed provider net seems to be not working 21:15:06 so I plan to add tempest scenario test for it to make it easier maintanable 21:15:25 I did a quick pass Friday evening and needs some refinement. Please also take a look an this spec 21:15:31 lajoskatona: Great. Thanks 21:16:57 Finally I noticed that https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828607 was filed 21:16:58 Launchpad bug 1828607 in neutron "[RFE] DVR Enhancements" [Undecided,In progress] 21:17:39 tidwellr: we will discuss it in the neutron drivers meeting 21:17:50 sounds good 21:17:56 for the time being I will assume no blueprint is immediatly needed 21:18:00 correct? 21:18:07 I've started a spec https://review.opendev.org/658414 21:18:20 it's really rough at the moment, but comments are welcome 21:18:37 but we can talk about at the drivers meeting 21:19:35 I need to look at the rfe and the spec carefully. I'll ping you Thursday to let you know if we can discuss it this friday or we need to add some flesh to the RFE or spec before that 21:20:02 I suspect we'll be adding flesh to one or both :) 21:20:23 LOL 21:20:44 The last one from the PTG is "Notify Ironic on port status changes" 21:21:22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828367 21:21:24 Launchpad bug 1828367 in neutron "[RFE] Ironic notifier - Notify Ironic on port status changes" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Harald Jensås (harald-jensas) 21:22:03 we agreed with TheJulia to support this in Denver. Here's the corresponding patch: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658787/ 21:22:34 I will create a blueprint to track it in our Train dashboard 21:22:47 but in the mean time, please look at the patch ^^^^ 21:22:59 ok 21:23:07 o/ sorry I’m late 21:23:15 any other blueprints to bring up today? 21:24:15 ok, let's move on 21:24:22 #topic Bugs 21:24:41 This week was mine 21:24:42 Last weeks we were in the capable hands of lajoskatona as our deputy 21:24:58 report is here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006176.html 21:25:13 Yeah. I added some highlights to the report: 21:25:49 There are 2 ryu related bugs with Rocky, Personally I have no idea how these should be fixed 21:25:53 The RFEs are all in my radar screen 21:26:06 mlavalle: ok 21:26:28 and there are still a few unassigned 21:26:31 also https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828473 was discussed with Ubuntu in Denver 21:26:32 Launchpad bug 1828473 in neutron "Dnsmasq spawned by neutron-dhcp-agent should use bind-dynamic option instead of bind-interfaces" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley) 21:27:24 i did a quick hack there last week 21:27:26 mlavalle: ok, I missed that one 21:27:42 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658240/ 21:27:50 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828605 is going to be taken, most likely, by liuyulong 21:27:51 Launchpad bug 1828605 in neutron "[l3][scale issue] unrestricted hosting routers in network node increase service operating pressure" [Medium,New] 21:28:24 yeah with similar topic there is an RFE perhaps if i am right 21:28:31 lajoskatona: it's still good that you brught it up 21:28:55 perhaps this is the RFE: #1828494 from Lyu 21:29:31 and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658451/ which has had some discussions 21:30:27 I think that's all for bugs from me 21:30:31 lajoskatona: one of those ryu issues was fixed in os-ken recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828406, the other doesn't really look like a ryu issue it's really a neutron-dynamic-routing issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828547 and I'm looking at it 21:30:34 Launchpad bug 1828406 in neutron "neutron-dynamic-routing bgp ryu hold timer expired but never tried to recover" [Low,Invalid] 21:30:35 Launchpad bug 1828547 in neutron "neutron-dynamic-routing TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable" [Low,New] - Assigned to Ryan Tidwell (ryan-tidwell) 21:31:11 tidwellr: so perhaps on stable/rocky we can change ryu to os-ken? 21:32:08 I mean thats sounds logical, but a little more than the usual stable backporting :-) 21:32:16 mhhh, not sure we can do that 21:32:36 what do you think, bcafarel, haleyb? 21:33:08 it wasn't a very eventful migration, but I'm leery of this kind of change on stable branches 21:33:26 yeah 21:33:39 mlavalle: i didn't think we could change requirements, at least i've seen other comments to such 21:33:46 not too keen on doing such a big change in stable rocky yep :/ even if it is mostly renaming, that is a lot of code churn 21:34:02 yeah 21:34:04 oh right, and adding a new dependency on stable update ^ 21:34:57 ok, let's move on 21:35:30 this week we are in the equally capable hands of tidwellr as our bugs deputy 21:36:15 and I will be sending an email to Swami to make sure he is aware it is his turn next week 21:36:45 any other bugs we should discuss today? 21:37:16 no more from me 21:37:37 thanks lajoskatona. and also for staying up this late! 21:38:08 mlavalle: :-) 21:38:15 ok 21:38:43 boden sent me an email earlier today indicating that he couldn't meke it today to the meeting 21:38:52 so let's skip to.... 21:38:59 #topic On demand agenda 21:39:15 anythiong else we should discuss today? 21:40:04 ok guys 21:40:14 returning 20 minutes to your busy agendas 21:40:19 yay :) 21:40:21 have a great week! 21:40:24 bye 21:40:27 #endmeeting