14:00:31 <slaweq> #startmeeting networking
14:00:32 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 18 14:00:31 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:33 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:41 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:52 <haleyb> hi
14:01:03 <tidwellr> hi
14:01:09 <amotoki> hi
14:01:11 <rubasov> o/
14:01:19 <lajoskatona> hi
14:01:32 <bcafarel> hello
14:01:39 <slaweq> #topic Announcements
14:01:51 <slaweq> Milestone is T-2 is week of July 22 - 26
14:02:08 <slaweq> #link https://releases.openstack.org/train/schedule.html
14:02:38 <ralonsoh> hi
14:02:44 <slaweq> Open Infrastructure Summit CFP Open - Deadline: July 2
14:02:58 <slaweq> please remember to submit talks proposals if You want to have talk there :)
14:03:10 <slaweq> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006262.html
14:03:27 <slaweq> and as a reminder:
14:03:30 <slaweq> Train PTG summary: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006408.html
14:03:42 <slaweq> any other announcements do You have?
14:04:42 <slaweq> ok, if not lets move on to the next topic
14:05:01 <slaweq> #topic Blueprints
14:05:35 <slaweq> I moved blueprints from Train-1 to Train-2 today
14:05:37 <slaweq> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/train-2
14:05:45 <mlavalle> +1
14:06:18 <slaweq> and I wanted to ask if https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/smart-nic-ovs  and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/event-notifier-ironic  can be maybe marked as completed
14:06:24 <slaweq> mlavalle: what do You think as an approver?
14:06:57 <mlavalle> yes both are complte and I am marking them so right now
14:07:03 <slaweq> thx
14:07:17 <slaweq> so we still have 2 more on the list
14:07:19 <slaweq> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/enginefacade-switch
14:07:48 <njohnston> there is slow but steady progress on engine facade
14:07:49 <mlavalle> on going effort
14:07:49 <slaweq> this is progressing every week thanks to njohnston, ralonsoh and mlavalle
14:07:53 <slaweq> :)
14:08:26 <slaweq> thx for pushing this forward :)
14:08:45 <slaweq> and the last one on the list https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-segment-per-network-per-host -
14:08:50 <slaweq> any updates on this?
14:08:59 <mlavalle> 3 things to say about this one
14:09:44 <mlavalle> 1) wwriverrat has updated the patch and we need to help him with answering questions he posted there
14:09:48 <mlavalle> hang on please...
14:10:25 <mlavalle> here's the patch
14:10:29 <mlavalle> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/623115/
14:11:09 <mlavalle> 2) ralonsoh has been looking into this from the sr-iov perspective. His initial feedback is that it won't have any impact
14:11:13 <mlavalle> correct?
14:11:20 <ralonsoh> that's correct
14:11:33 <ralonsoh> I  don't see any problem on this, because SRIOV is only L2
14:12:19 <slaweq> there is also spec for that to review, right?
14:12:45 <mlavalle> 3) I am doing the same from the OVS perspective. I was going to experiment with the patch in my routed networks deployment but had tto spend some time with https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1830679
14:12:47 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1830679 in neutron "Security groups RBAC cause a major performance degradation" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)
14:13:02 <mlavalle> but I will come back to it later this week
14:13:36 <mlavalle> and yes, here's the spec: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657170
14:13:58 <mlavalle> really the work that ralonsoh and I are doing will help to finish open questions in the spec
14:14:15 <mlavalle> wwriverrat asked "community" help with sr-iov and ovs
14:14:36 <mlavalle> that's all we have on this topic
14:14:44 <mlavalle> on this blueprint, rather
14:14:56 <slaweq> ok, thx mlavalle and ralonsoh for update
14:15:06 <mlavalle> before we move on....
14:15:09 <slaweq> mlavalle: do we have any other blueprints which we should add to the list?
14:15:34 <mlavalle> I will add today a blueprint for the work that tidwellr is doing with subnet pools
14:15:50 <mlavalle> we recently approved blueprint to remove restrictions on them
14:16:12 <slaweq> yes, and I think patches for that are almost ready, right?
14:16:26 <tidwellr> I haven't started on that yet
14:16:51 <tidwellr> I will shortly though
14:16:56 <mlavalle> also want to ask rubasov if he is ok with me adding a blueprint for the work he is doing on extra routes?
14:17:16 <rubasov> mlavalle: absolutely
14:17:22 <mlavalle> Great
14:17:24 <rubasov> but it's not yet merged
14:17:39 <rubasov> I mean the spec for it
14:17:46 <mlavalle> I know
14:17:56 <mlavalle> but we are getting there, right?
14:18:10 <rubasov> I hope, there's a new patch set
14:18:15 <mlavalle> cool
14:18:35 <mlavalle> Finally, I have to confess a miserable failure on my part....
14:19:24 <mlavalle> during the PTG we discussed the adoption of the Neutron Classifier in Neutron QoS
14:19:51 <mlavalle> I have promised more than once davidsha to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/636333
14:20:17 <mlavalle> and haven't found the long enough chunk of time I need to do it
14:20:39 <mlavalle> so, I want to create a blueprint to add to our dashboard to track this effort
14:20:51 <mlavalle> is that ok with you davidsha?
14:21:01 <davidsha> mlavalle: sure
14:21:21 <mlavalle> davidsha: and it is still in my pile of things to do, ok?
14:21:35 <bcafarel> anything to look at on neutron-classifier side? I did not have time to check reviews on it recently either :/
14:21:55 <mlavalle> Here's the PoC: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/636333
14:22:11 <mlavalle> bcafarel: ^^^^
14:22:24 <slaweq> I will also try to look at it this week finally
14:22:41 <davidsha> ya, it's grand
14:23:19 <bcafarel> ack I will push it back higher on the pile
14:23:34 <mlavalle> that's all I have as far as blueprints
14:23:46 <slaweq> thx mlavalle for updates :)
14:24:20 <slaweq> ok, lets move on
14:24:29 <slaweq> #topic community goals
14:24:43 <slaweq> we have still one "old" goal on the list:
14:24:45 <slaweq> Run under Python 3 by default (njohnston)
14:25:24 <njohnston> no progress on that this week
14:25:43 <slaweq> I just wanted to say that we are tracking progress of it in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron_stadium_python3_status
14:26:04 <bcafarel> networking-sfc is done here
14:26:05 <slaweq> if someone wants to help with some stadium project, feel free to assign it to yourself :)
14:26:21 <njohnston> +1
14:26:23 <bcafarel> thanks slaweq for the easily reusable functional job definition!
14:26:34 <slaweq> bcafarel: yw :)
14:26:47 <slaweq> also neutron-vpnaas was done last week
14:27:23 <mlavalle> by slaweq, right?
14:27:33 <slaweq> mlavalle: yes :)
14:27:37 <slaweq> why?
14:27:39 <mlavalle> Thanks!
14:27:52 <mlavalle> just wanted to give credit to you
14:28:00 <mlavalle> in wasn;t the ether who did it
14:28:07 <slaweq> thx :)
14:28:19 <slaweq> team did it - and that's fine :)
14:28:33 <slaweq> this week I will try to push some patches for fwaas also
14:29:19 <slaweq> any updates on other goals?
14:29:35 <slaweq> I don't have anything regarding 2 "current" goals
14:30:07 <mlavalle> maybe say we need volunteers?
14:30:40 <slaweq> yes, we need :)
14:30:51 <mlavalle> so one is docs in PDF
14:30:54 <mlavalle> right?
14:30:55 <slaweq> but I don't think that it will be a lot of work to do on our side
14:31:04 <slaweq> yes
14:31:09 <slaweq> and the second is "Support IPv6-Only Deployments"
14:31:21 <mlavalle> right
14:31:26 <slaweq> I can take care about "Support IPv6-Only Deployments" as qa liaison :)
14:31:38 <mlavalle> maybe what we need for the time being are liaisons
14:31:45 <mlavalle> with those two efforts
14:32:33 <njohnston> I believe the documentation liaison is boden
14:32:36 <slaweq> so we will still need someone for this Docs in PDF one
14:32:46 <mlavalle> yes he is
14:32:48 <slaweq> njohnston: yes, I was also thinking about asking him :)
14:33:11 <mlavalle> speaking of the devil
14:33:13 <mlavalle> LOL
14:33:18 <slaweq> :)
14:33:23 <bcafarel> or amotoki who apparently had volunteered at ptg (from mlavalle's recap mail)
14:33:36 <mlavalle> ahhh, that's right
14:34:17 <slaweq> amotoki: are You fine to assign this goal to You?
14:35:19 <mlavalle> maybe he dropped off
14:35:22 <mlavalle> let's move on
14:35:34 <slaweq> ok, I will ask him tomorrow
14:35:43 <slaweq> lets move on then
14:35:48 <slaweq> #topic Bugs
14:36:08 <slaweq> last week bug deputy was mlavalle and his summary is on http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-June/007189.html
14:36:18 <slaweq> mlavalle: do You want to highlight some bugs?
14:36:54 <mlavalle> I want to say that all the critical and high priority bugs are either fixed or have patches well under way
14:37:43 <slaweq> that is good news :)
14:37:48 <mlavalle> I want to ask ralonsoh if he is going to work on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1832925?
14:37:49 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1832925 in neutron "Class neutron.common.utils.Timer is not thread safe" [Medium,Confirmed]
14:38:11 <ralonsoh> mlavalle, yes but I don't see any good solution
14:38:38 <mlavalle> can I assign it to you in Launchpad?
14:38:39 <ralonsoh> because using signal.alarm makes the main thread to exit with an exception when timeout
14:38:48 <ralonsoh> yes, please
14:38:57 <mlavalle> thanks!
14:39:19 <mlavalle> and we need more triaging for https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1832021
14:39:20 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1832021 in neutron "Checksum drop of metadata traffic on isolated networks with DPDK" [Medium,New]
14:39:32 <mlavalle> if anyone can help with this
14:40:00 <slaweq> according to the last comment it was caused by using veth in dhcp agent
14:40:03 <mlavalle> Finally I wanted to ask boden about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1830679
14:40:04 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1830679 in neutron "Security groups RBAC cause a major performance degradation" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)
14:40:40 <mlavalle> is the improvement so far something you and your co-workers can live with while I investigate further improvments?
14:40:45 <slaweq> can we then do anything with this or maybe just docs update will be enough?
14:40:49 <boden> mlavalle thanks for your work on that.. certainly a step in the right direction, but hope we can eventually get perf back close to were it was
14:41:34 <boden> mlavalle yes I think we are moving in the right direction, since a revert isn't as easy as I had thought/hoped
14:42:05 <mlavalle> boden: yes, that's my intent. I am just trying to get a sense how urgent is the further improvement
14:42:19 <boden> mlavalle thanks again
14:42:24 <mlavalle> I definitely want to get it to what it was before
14:42:58 <mlavalle> slaweq: yes, that's a valid option
14:43:28 <slaweq> mlavalle: ok, so I will write it in the comment there
14:44:28 <mlavalle> ok, I'm done with my update
14:44:56 <slaweq> thx mlavalle
14:45:06 <slaweq> anyone else have something to add according to bugs?
14:45:49 <slaweq> ok, lets move on then
14:46:03 <slaweq> next week's bug deputy is yamamoto
14:46:13 <mlavalle> this week's
14:46:22 <slaweq> sorry, this week, right
14:46:26 * mlavalle sent a reminder email to him last week
14:46:34 <slaweq> and next week will be rubasov
14:46:43 <rubasov> slaweq: ack
14:46:44 <mlavalle> yeah, so we are in good hands
14:47:04 <slaweq> I think yamamoto is aware of it and he already started his bug deputy as I saw some his comments on bugs today
14:47:25 <slaweq> so lets move on to the next topic
14:47:29 <slaweq> #topic neutron-lib
14:47:34 <slaweq> boden: any updates?
14:47:37 <boden> hi
14:47:41 <boden> just 1 thing quickly
14:48:07 <boden> there's a desired from folks to release neutron-lib again... including https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665658/
14:48:29 <boden> however we haven't even started to use neutron-lib 1.27.0 yet https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663141/
14:48:45 <boden> maybe we should just release 1.28 and skip 1.27.0 ^
14:48:46 <boden> ?
14:48:57 <mlavalle> fine with me
14:49:23 <slaweq> I just +W this patch with 1.27 but I'm fine with release 1.28 :)
14:49:25 <mlavalle> I'd rather streamline folks development efforts than keep releases sequential numbers :-)
14:49:59 <boden> I will try to post a 1.28.0 release patch today; otherwise someone can feel free to do so... I will be out the reminder of the week after today
14:50:05 <mlavalle> I'm anal ratentive but not that much
14:50:18 <boden> I am too, I just keep it to myself ;)
14:50:42 <boden> thats all I have for neutron-lib
14:50:57 <slaweq> thx boden for update
14:51:17 <slaweq> ok, last topic for today
14:51:18 <slaweq> #topic On demand agenda
14:51:29 <slaweq> there is something from haleyb on agenda
14:51:39 <slaweq> but I think it was discussed last week, no?
14:51:40 <amotoki> sorry for dropping for a while. I walked from the station to home. I am fine to assign myself to the PDF docs goal.
14:51:56 <mlavalle> yes, it was discussed last week
14:52:01 <slaweq> thx amotoki :)
14:52:04 <haleyb> slaweq: might have forgot to remove
14:52:20 <slaweq> haleyb: no problem :) I will remove it
14:52:30 <slaweq> I just wanted to ask to not miss something :)
14:53:00 <slaweq> done for both changes
14:53:11 <slaweq> anything else You want to talk today?
14:54:00 <mlavalle> not from me
14:54:09 <slaweq> if not, I will give You couple of minutes back :)
14:54:18 <slaweq> thx for attending and have a great week
14:54:20 <slaweq> o/
14:54:23 <lajoskatona> o/
14:54:23 * mlavalle is happy amotoki made it to home safely :-)
14:54:24 <bcafarel> o/
14:54:24 <slaweq> #endmeeting