21:00:03 <slaweq> #startmeeting networking
21:00:03 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Feb  3 21:00:03 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:04 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:06 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
21:00:08 <slaweq> hi
21:00:24 <bcafarel> o/
21:00:27 <haleyb> hi
21:01:18 <slaweq> not too big attendence so far :)
21:01:23 <njohnston> o/
21:01:37 <slaweq> ok, US:EU 2:2 so far ;P
21:02:16 <slaweq> so, lets move on
21:02:18 <slaweq> #topic Announcements
21:02:30 <slaweq> Next week is Ussuri-2 milestone: https://releases.openstack.org/ussuri/schedule.html
21:02:50 <slaweq> should we also think about new releases of stable branches, like train and stein?
21:02:53 <slaweq> haleyb: bcafarel?
21:03:32 <bcafarel> sounds good, for rocky EM is soonish so we can put final release around that time (especially when gates are finally back in working order)
21:04:05 <slaweq> bcafarel: yes, that's why I asked about stein and train :)
21:04:05 <bcafarel> I'll check for stein/train and get a status by EOW (remaining stuff that would be nice to get in if any)
21:04:14 <bcafarel> :)
21:04:23 <slaweq> thx bcafarel, I will then take care of it next week to make releases
21:04:29 <bcafarel> rocky is everyone's "favorite" stable branch these days
21:04:38 <slaweq> LOL, true
21:04:43 <slaweq> all is red there
21:05:38 <slaweq> as we are getting close to U-2, we are still looking for new maintainers for neutron-fwaas
21:05:47 <slaweq> LAST CALL reminder was sent: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-January/012099.html
21:06:02 <slaweq> but I still didn't get anyone who would like to maintain it
21:06:30 <slaweq> so probably at the end of next week I will have to start some process of deprecating it (I don't know yet how to do it exactly)
21:07:22 <njohnston> I have some examples I can send you
21:07:42 <slaweq> njohnston: would be great, thx
21:07:47 <slaweq> but it can be next week :)
21:08:04 <slaweq> ok, lets move on, next announcement
21:08:08 <slaweq> We are also getting close to Rocky EM. It's in 3 weeks from now: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-January/012207.html
21:08:23 <slaweq> here are open neutron reviews for Rocky: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/branch:%255Estable/rocky+status:open+(project:%255Eopenstack/neutron)
21:08:41 <slaweq> and for stadium projects: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/branch:^stable/rocky+status:open+(project:^openstack/neutron)
21:08:59 <slaweq> as for now there is a lot of -1 from zuul (all)
21:09:41 <slaweq> bcafarel: is it only because of this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704257/ ?
21:11:03 <bcafarel> and maybe tempest version too, see DNM test in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705117/
21:11:43 <bcafarel> hopefully we can get some green back in that sad list soon
21:12:29 <bcafarel> also elod had generated etherpad lists for rock EM releases, here is neutron one (with some comments) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-stable-rocky-em
21:14:25 <slaweq> bcafarel: thx, it's worth to track what we still need before making EM release
21:15:17 <slaweq> I will be crossing out from this list patches already merged
21:16:25 <slaweq> so I think we can move on to the next announcement
21:16:35 <slaweq> it's last but not least on my list for today
21:16:48 <slaweq> We now have new member of our drivers team - welcome in the drivers team Nate :)
21:17:12 <bcafarel> congrats njohnston :)
21:17:17 <njohnston> Thank you!  I feel very honored.
21:18:33 <slaweq> ok, lets move on then
21:18:35 <slaweq> #topic Blueprints
21:18:49 <slaweq> BPs for Ussuri-2: https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/ussuri-2
21:19:15 <slaweq> I know we will not finish them for U-2 probably, but last week we made quite big progress
21:19:21 <slaweq> and I hope to do some progress this week too
21:20:01 <slaweq> I think we are pretty close to finish OVN merge BP now
21:20:36 <slaweq> haleyb: do You know how much we are still missing to mark it as complete?
21:21:27 <haleyb> slaweq: i see functional tests and docs missing, then changing the job
21:21:32 <haleyb> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/neutron-ovn-merge+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
21:21:58 <haleyb> it's pretty close
21:22:14 <slaweq> ok, docs are on me and I have to get back to this patch and finish it
21:22:34 <slaweq> and I know that those functional tests are also pretty close (at least "part 1")
21:22:59 <haleyb> slaweq: i can take a look at the docs patch possibly too, just don't know what it needs besides a rebase
21:23:27 <slaweq> haleyb: IIRC think there was issue with building this docs
21:23:42 <slaweq> and there were some comments to move some documents to other places
21:23:55 <slaweq> feel free to send some PS if You want :)
21:25:00 <slaweq> ok, lets move on
21:25:18 <slaweq> for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/tagging-on-post  and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/fip-pf-description we are only missing OSC/SDK bits
21:25:26 <slaweq> neutron and neutron-lib is done
21:26:26 <slaweq> also on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#Blueprints You can find list of BPs which I moved already to U-3 as I still hope to make some progress on them in this cycle
21:27:02 <slaweq> and list of BPs which I removed milestone as we don't see any progress on them and there is no volunteers for them currently
21:27:51 <slaweq> and that's all from my side about BPs
21:27:57 <slaweq> any other updates You have maybe?
21:28:22 <njohnston> I am waiting for Aditya to address mlavalle's concerns over the stateless security groups implementation
21:28:34 <njohnston> Not sure how much of a change to the design those will require
21:29:05 <njohnston> but still hopeful that we can get the neutron server parts in this cycle.  What is left is a fullstack test and the OSC/SDK bits there too.
21:29:59 <njohnston> that's it from me
21:30:17 <slaweq> njohnston: TBH I think that some fullstack tests should be even maybe made in this patch with server implementation
21:30:30 <slaweq> because I'm not sure if we will have follow-up for this anytime soon
21:30:55 <njohnston> slaweq: yeah, I might have to push a PS with those myself, I think they are outside Aditya's comfort zone
21:31:06 <slaweq> ahh, ok
21:31:07 <njohnston> so I'll look at doing that this week
21:31:21 <slaweq> if You volunteer to help with that, I'm fine with follow-up then
21:31:23 <slaweq> :)
21:31:55 <njohnston> +1
21:32:14 <slaweq> and mlavalle has got very good point there
21:32:28 <slaweq> so lets wait for addressing his comments :)
21:33:53 <slaweq> ok, I think we can move on than
21:33:59 <slaweq> to the next topic which is
21:34:01 <slaweq> #topic Community goals
21:34:40 <slaweq> I think that we agreed last week that we finished dropping py27 support so we can mark it as done and not talk about it anymore, right?
21:35:22 <bcafarel> it was not as enjoyable as we thought it would be, but still yes :)
21:35:31 <njohnston> yep
21:35:35 <slaweq> great
21:35:46 <slaweq> thx njohnston and bcafarel for all Your work on this :)
21:36:12 <slaweq> for project specific ptl/contributor guides, I didn't had time to start it yet
21:36:17 <slaweq> so no update so far
21:36:30 <slaweq> and the same for IPv6 only deployments for stadium projects
21:37:00 <slaweq> do You have anything else related to the community goals for today?
21:37:09 <njohnston> nothing at this time
21:37:55 <slaweq> ok
21:37:59 <slaweq> so next topic
21:38:01 <slaweq> #topic Bugs
21:38:21 <slaweq> tidwellr was on bug deputy. His report is at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012332.html
21:39:00 <slaweq> basically I think it's all under control
21:39:15 <slaweq> I just asked about some more details in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861674
21:39:15 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861674 in neutron "Gateway which is not in subnet CIDR is unsupported in ha router" [Undecided,New]
21:39:46 <slaweq> and in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861496 it seems for me at first glance as added in allowed_address_pairs in one of the existing ports
21:39:46 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861496 in neutron "All ports of server instance are open even no security group does allow this" [Undecided,Incomplete]
21:40:02 <slaweq> but lets wait for reply for bug reporter
21:40:42 <slaweq> and that's all from my side
21:41:03 <slaweq> do You have anything else related to bugs for today?
21:42:04 <bcafarel> I think I had one but cannot remember :/ probably rocky gate issue though
21:43:42 <slaweq> bcafarel: do You need few more minutes to find it? or should we move on?
21:44:13 <bcafarel> let's go on, I'll paste link if I find it again :)
21:44:24 <slaweq> bcafarel: ok
21:44:38 <slaweq> bug deputy for this week should be Swami
21:44:53 <slaweq> but I just got email from him that he will not be able to do that this week as he is traveling
21:45:14 <slaweq> njohnston: Your bug deputy turn is in 2 weeks (Feb 17th)
21:45:20 <slaweq> would You like to switch it to know?
21:45:37 <slaweq> I will than ask Swami if he can take over week of Feb 17th for You
21:45:38 <njohnston> sure, I can do now
21:45:42 <slaweq> thx a lot
21:45:43 <njohnston> no problem
21:46:15 <slaweq> ok, so that was the last thing from me for today
21:46:41 <slaweq> I don't see anything new on "on demand agenda" but if You have anything You want to talk about, go on now :)
21:47:05 <bcafarel> nothing from me :)
21:48:29 <slaweq> if not, lets finish this meeting a bit earlier today
21:48:41 <slaweq> thx for attending and have a great week
21:48:43 <slaweq> o/
21:48:45 <bcafarel> o/
21:48:49 <slaweq> #endmeeting