14:00:13 #startmeeting networking 14:00:14 Meeting started Tue May 19 14:00:13 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:00:24 hi 14:00:28 o/ 14:00:30 o/ 14:00:31 o/ 14:00:42 o/ 14:01:38 o/ 14:01:41 ok, lets start the meeting 14:01:42 #topic Announcements 14:01:59 first, the most important one: 14:02:13 We released Ussuri version! Congrats everyone and thanks for Your hard work! 14:02:25 https://releases.openstack.org/ussuri/ 14:02:28 o/ 14:02:28 \o/ 14:02:34 (and \o/ too) 14:03:15 ++ 14:03:33 and the second one is related to this 14:03:40 we are now in the Victoria cycle https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html 14:03:54 Victoria-1 milestone is in the week of Jun 15th so in 4 weeks 14:04:24 and the Victoria release is planned for 16th October 14:05:08 hi (sorry) 14:05:10 and the next one, related to the previous one 14:05:22 Victoria PTG (virtual) is in 2 weeks 14:05:32 planning etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-victoria-ptg - next week I will start planning sessions so would be good to have list of topics more or less finalized, 14:06:39 Registration is live: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-May/014649.html - if You didn't yet, please register :) 14:07:22 we will have nova-neutron session on Friday 13:00 UTC - and also we will discuss on this session some topics related to Nova and Cyborg together 14:08:30 if You are interested in some topics related to the FPGA and smartNICs, You should mark this slot in Your calendar :) 14:09:18 and that's all announcements which I have for You today 14:09:27 anything else You want to announce now maybe? 14:10:50 ok, so lets move on 14:10:53 next topic 14:10:54 #topic Blueprints 14:11:09 BPs for Victoria-1 are here: https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/victoria-1 14:11:16 I have questions about 2 of them 14:11:28 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dns-records-in-neutron - mlavalle, can You be approver of this one? 14:11:41 yes 14:11:45 thx a lot 14:12:06 and I have the same question for amotoki regarding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/sg-sharing-as-readonly 14:12:23 amotoki: would You mind if I would set You as approver of this one? 14:12:37 I am fine with that 14:12:39 it's related to the RBAC and You are an expert in this area IMO 14:12:41 thx a lot 14:13:52 any other updates about BPs do You have for today maybe? 14:14:38 amotoki, for this sharing as readonly BP we already merged spec https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724207/ 14:14:49 just FYI if You somehow missed that :) 14:15:02 slaweq: yeah, I noticed it a couple of days ago 14:15:51 amotoki: ok :) 14:16:15 mlavalle: and we also have proposed spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dns-records-in-neutron 14:16:22 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726904/ 14:16:32 but I didn't have time yet to look at it 14:16:33 there yes 14:16:58 I'll review it today 14:17:04 thx 14:18:47 ok, so if there is nothing else related to BPs today, lets move on to the next topic 14:18:59 #topic Community goals 14:19:18 any updates on Migrate to zuulv3 ? 14:19:45 For Zuulv3, aside from the work still needed on networking-midonet, the main thing is the work lajoskatona has been doing with tosky on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725647/ 14:19:54 for networking-odl grenade migration 14:20:09 AFAIK that is it for the goal 14:20:23 yeah tosky is kind enough yo guide me through grenade depths 14:21:31 ok, thx lajoskatona for working on that 14:21:43 as for midonet I looked into it briefly this week 14:21:51 but there are 2 problems with that: 14:22:12 1. all those legacy jobs are scenario jobs which are disabled since long time as they were broken 14:22:46 2. I'm not sure how networking-midonet will work e.g. on Centos8 now, I know there were some problems with running it on Ubuntu 18.04 14:22:56 and also 14:23:15 3. I really don't have time to focus on networking-midonet jobs too much :/ 14:24:47 so my plan is to maybe try to do migration of the jobs and compare if they are failing in same/similar way like the legacy ones 14:24:58 I will for sure not spent too much time on fixing those jobs 14:25:09 *existing failures in those jobs 14:26:15 ok, lets move on to the next topic 14:26:17 #topic Bugs 14:26:27 rubasov was our bug deputy last week 14:26:35 Report http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-May/014913.html 14:26:49 yep 14:26:51 rubasov: do You want to discuss some of bugs today? 14:27:28 I'd like to call your attention to the two unassigned bugs in the report 14:27:39 both medium 14:28:44 and there's another in the report as incomplete, but I should go back and triage it better: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1879009 14:28:44 Launchpad bug 1879009 in neutron "attaching extra port to server raise duplicate dns-name error" [Undecided,Incomplete] 14:28:54 the unassigned: 14:29:00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1877977 14:29:00 Launchpad bug 1877977 in neutron "[DVR] Recovery from openvswitch restart fails when veth are used for bridges interconnection" [Medium,Confirmed] 14:29:09 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1878299 14:29:14 Launchpad bug 1878299 in neutron "[floatingip port_forwarding] changing external port to used value hangs with retriable exception" [Medium,Confirmed] 14:29:33 rubasov: thx, I had the same bugs on my list too :) 14:29:37 all others have people working on them 14:30:01 I guess that's all 14:30:03 and actually I wanted to discuss about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1877977 - do we really need to keep veth interconnection still? 14:30:03 Launchpad bug 1877977 in neutron "[DVR] Recovery from openvswitch restart fails when veth are used for bridges interconnection" [Medium,Confirmed] 14:30:19 sorry for maybe stupid question but what is the usecase for it? 14:30:25 I see no reason for this 14:30:32 we don't test it in u/s gate at all 14:30:56 there is no use case 14:31:00 at some point in the past didn't veth and patch ports behave differently regarding to namespaces? 14:31:21 but this is to link bridges 14:31:38 the patch port is this logical way 14:31:43 yes, this is to connect bridges together, eg. br-int and br-ex 14:31:57 ralonsoh: you're right that's irrelevant here 14:32:11 I'm not talking about using veth in the e.g. L3 agent - that's different story 14:34:11 do You think we can add topic about deprecation of this option to the PTG agenda? 14:34:18 +1 14:34:26 +1 14:34:49 +1 for the PTG topic. i see the reason for ovs_use_veth, but I am not sure about use_veth_interconnection. 14:35:30 ok, thx I will add it to the etherpad 14:37:02 ok, regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1878299 I think this should be raised on L3 subteam meeting 14:37:02 Launchpad bug 1878299 in neutron "[floatingip port_forwarding] changing external port to used value hangs with retriable exception" [Medium,Confirmed] 14:38:50 any other bugs You want to discuss today? 14:40:30 ok, so lets move on 14:40:48 our bug deputy this week is maciejjozefczyk and I already ensure that he is aware of it :) 14:41:07 and next week will be ralonsoh's time 14:41:08 \o/ 14:41:14 ups... 14:41:23 ralonsoh: why "ups..."? :D 14:41:29 my first time! 14:41:32 You should say "YAY" 14:41:36 no no 14:41:38 ;) 14:42:01 you heard it everybody, fill as many launchpad bugs as possible next week! 14:42:08 LOL 14:42:10 hahaha 14:42:14 bcafarel, but not this week :D 14:42:51 ok, last topic for today 14:43:00 #topic On Demand Agenda 14:43:12 I see one small topic there 14:43:19 Review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665467 14:43:21 please review this and provide feedback so it can be merged. 14:43:38 I guess it's added by the owner of the patch 14:44:12 ok 14:44:17 I think that would be great if ralonsoh and rubasov could take a look into it especially 14:44:27 ralonsoh: as an SR-IOV and Intel expert 14:44:33 and rubasov as trunks expert 14:44:39 I still have some concerns about the shell commands calls 14:44:52 I'll comment on gerrit 14:44:58 and of course any other reviews are welcome :) 14:45:03 thx ralonsoh 14:45:13 it's huge but I'll digest it in pieces 14:45:36 rubasov: yes, it is huge :) 14:46:42 any other on demand topics? 14:46:47 yes :) 14:46:48 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/720464/ 14:47:05 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715157/ 14:47:22 Can I ask you folks to review those patches? There are already a few iterations of reviews but looks like its a bit stuck 14:47:44 sure 14:47:45 Flavio pointed a few nits I'm going to update soon, but I feel it still needs some eyes :) 14:47:56 sure maciejjozefczyk 14:48:05 It is needed to have a basic support for routed provider networks with OVN :) 14:48:17 thanks :) 14:48:36 mlavalle: please take a look at this as routed networks expert :) 14:48:49 will do 14:48:58 Thank You 14:49:17 thanks :) mlavalle 14:49:25 in my pile 14:49:52 oops looks like one was already in my pile 14:50:10 I will move them up higher in the pile :/ 14:51:11 thanks guys :) 14:51:25 anything else for today? 14:52:52 ok, if not then thx for attending and have a great week 14:52:58 o/ 14:52:59 o/ 14:53:00 #endmeeting