14:00:12 <slaweq> #startmeeting networking
14:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep  8 14:00:12 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:20 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:22 <slaweq> hi
14:00:36 <haleyb> o/
14:00:38 <rubasov> hello
14:01:06 <njohnston> o/
14:01:07 <bcafarel> o/
14:01:29 <slaweq> lets start
14:01:30 <slaweq> #topic Announcements
14:01:53 <slaweq> first of all, we are entering the final phase of the Victoria cycle now
14:01:54 <ralonsoh> hi
14:02:17 <slaweq> according to https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html this week is Feature and Requirements freeze and client libs final release
14:02:27 <slaweq> we have IMO 3 patches which would be good to include: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737431/ (in gate), https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749250/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729830/
14:02:36 <slaweq> please check them as soon as possible :)
14:03:27 <slaweq> and last week we released neutron-lib, ovsdbapp and os-ken non-client libs
14:03:47 <slaweq> next announcement
14:03:53 <slaweq> Virtual PTG in October (26-30)
14:04:12 <slaweq> according to doodle https://doodle.com/poll/2ppmnua2nuva5nyp I booked some time slots for us
14:04:18 <slaweq> see for details http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/017077.html
14:04:37 <slaweq> it is 14 hours in whole week so it may be too much even
14:04:47 <slaweq> but worst case we will finish earlier :)
14:05:03 <bcafarel> and have the pleasure to say "you get xxx hours back" :)
14:05:17 <slaweq> bcafarel: LOL, true :)
14:05:42 <slaweq> and regarding that, please add Your topics to the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-wallaby-ptg
14:05:55 <slaweq> not it is time to really start collecting topics there
14:06:50 <slaweq> and that's all announcements/reminders from me
14:06:59 <slaweq> anything else You want to announce to the team?
14:08:46 <slaweq> ok, if not, lets move on to the next topic
14:08:55 <slaweq> #topic Blueprints
14:09:04 <slaweq> Blueprints for Victoria-3: https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/victoria-3
14:09:16 <slaweq> I would like to discuss some of them today
14:09:28 <slaweq> first of all metadata over IPv6: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/metadata-over-ipv6
14:09:35 <slaweq> thx rubasov for all the patches
14:09:52 <rubasov> thanks everybody for the reviews
14:09:52 <slaweq> it seems for me that we have all merged now and we can consider it as done, is that correct?
14:10:08 <rubasov> there's some tests remaining
14:10:10 <rubasov> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin+owner:%22Bence+Romsics+%253Cbence.romsics%2540gmail.com%253E%22+status:open
14:10:22 <rubasov> but that's not a problem for the release I think
14:10:52 <rubasov> I mean it's not a problem if it only merges after the release
14:11:41 <rubasov> otherwise it's all complete
14:11:48 <slaweq> ok, so I can move this to victoria-rc now just to track progress with those tests
14:12:09 <rubasov> yes, please do that
14:12:17 <slaweq> ok, thx
14:13:44 <slaweq> done
14:13:46 <slaweq> next one:
14:13:48 <slaweq> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/address-groups-in-sg-rules
14:14:21 <slaweq> many things are merged for that but IIUC backend implementation is still not done so I think we will need to move this BP to the next release
14:14:25 <slaweq> do You agree?
14:14:56 <ralonsoh> we should yes
14:15:39 <ralonsoh> there are just a couple of not merged patches
14:15:46 <ralonsoh> and I think we can review them this week
14:16:32 <slaweq> mlavalle: are You ok with that? IIRC it is RFE from Your company, right?
14:17:03 <mlavalle> yes
14:17:28 <mlavalle> and yes
14:17:31 <slaweq> :)
14:17:33 <slaweq> thx
14:17:39 <slaweq> so I will move it to the next release for now
14:17:51 <slaweq> and we can finish it then
14:18:31 <slaweq> next one
14:18:33 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804
14:18:34 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1882804 in neutron "RFE: allow replacing the QoS policy of bound port" [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Lajos Katona (lajos-katona)
14:18:44 <slaweq> patches https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1882804+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:19:15 <slaweq> and question to lajoskatona and ralonsoh: do You think we can/should merge it this cycle?
14:19:36 <rubasov> I believe lajoskatona can only join this meeting a bit later
14:19:37 <ralonsoh> some nits in the patch and a couple of questions
14:19:43 <ralonsoh> I think could be done in time
14:20:02 <slaweq> ralonsoh: but deadline is this week, or we will need to ask for FFE
14:20:10 <ralonsoh> I know...
14:20:26 <ralonsoh> as a reviewer, I think is almost there
14:20:37 <slaweq> ok, so lets keep an eye on this
14:20:50 <slaweq> ralonsoh: can You set high review priority on related patches?
14:20:56 <ralonsoh> sure
14:20:59 <slaweq> thx
14:21:26 <slaweq> next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1863113 - George framework
14:21:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1863113 in neutron "[RFE] Introduce new testing framework for Neutron - OVN integration - a.k.a George" [Wishlist,New] - Assigned to Jakub Libosvar (libosvar)
14:21:48 <slaweq> and as this is just tests related, I think we can still continue reviews and merge it at any time really
14:21:55 <slaweq> it doesn't impacts production code at all
14:22:25 <slaweq> next one:
14:22:27 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1888487
14:22:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1888487 in neutron "Change the default value of "propagate_uplink_status" to True" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)
14:22:38 <ralonsoh> almost merged
14:22:43 <slaweq> last missing patch for that is in gate now so this should be ok very soon
14:22:51 <ralonsoh> thank you all
14:22:52 <slaweq> thx njohnston for review today :)
14:23:02 <slaweq> next one
14:23:04 <slaweq> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/local-ip-prefix-in-metering-rules
14:23:10 <slaweq> Patches: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1889431+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:23:37 <slaweq> this one I think we should try to finish in this cycle as we already merged some patches which deprecated old parameter
14:24:06 <slaweq> so would be good to have merged also something in place of this deprecated parameter
14:25:28 <slaweq> so I will keep it here and will set review priority for those patches too
14:25:39 <slaweq> and the last one on my list:
14:25:41 <slaweq> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/granular-metering-data
14:25:50 <slaweq> patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735605/ is in the gate now\
14:25:56 <slaweq> so should be finished soon
14:26:28 <slaweq> at the end of the week I will review this list again as I need to prepare some cycle highlights draft
14:26:52 <slaweq> and I will update this list then
14:27:13 <slaweq> and that's all about BPs from me for today
14:27:21 <slaweq> anything else You want to add here?
14:28:05 <bcafarel> nothing else except "nice recap"
14:28:12 <njohnston> +1
14:28:14 <ralonsoh> +1
14:28:19 <slaweq> thx
14:28:23 <slaweq> so lets move on
14:28:26 <slaweq> next topic
14:28:32 <slaweq> #topic Community Goals
14:28:53 <slaweq> I have one important information for today:
14:28:58 <slaweq> about Migrate CI/CD jobs to new Ubuntu LTS Focal
14:29:12 <slaweq> Current plan send by gmann is onhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/017060.html
14:29:37 <slaweq> so he is going to pull the trigger and switch everything this week
14:29:44 <lajoskatona> Hi, sorry for being late
14:29:51 <slaweq> hi lajoskatona
14:30:21 <slaweq> for us it's mostly ok I think
14:30:21 <lajoskatona> Hi
14:30:39 <slaweq> we have one issue with linuxbridge based jobs on focal
14:30:58 <bcafarel> lower-constraints failed on tests themselves in DNM https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738163 (as tox jobs should be switched today)
14:31:13 <slaweq> but that is workarounded by switching to ebtables-legacy
14:32:43 <slaweq> bcafarel: do we have LP for this lowe-constraints job failures?
14:33:13 <bcafarel> not yet, I started to look into yesterday evening and just remembered :( sorry
14:33:17 <bcafarel> will create it now
14:33:32 <slaweq> bcafarel: np, thx for checking that
14:34:01 <slaweq> and I think it will be high priority for us now as it may block our gate when tox jobs will be switched
14:34:26 <bcafarel> exactly, as apparently switch for that is planned for really-soon
14:35:35 <slaweq> maybe we should just bump some requirements in lower-constraints?
14:36:06 <slaweq> I would start with checking oslo_messaging and ssl
14:36:31 <lajoskatona> this morning the guy from midonet found that some of our constraints (peacan?) are higher that is constrained in global for example
14:36:41 <lajoskatona> so perhaps a general check would be good
14:37:39 <lajoskatona> this was the patch for pecan: https://review.opendev.org/744035 which lifted to 1.4.0, but that's just one
14:37:50 <bcafarel> slaweq: and eventlet too (this fixed at least 1 failing test locally)
14:38:20 <bcafarel> I thought the pecan global req was fixed? (after gnocchiclient fix)
14:38:50 <bcafarel> slaweq: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1894857 (and yes overall a review/bump of lower-constraints should do the trick)
14:38:52 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1894857 in neutron "lower-constraints job fail on Focal" [Undecided,New]
14:40:04 <lajoskatona> bcafarel: here it is 1.3.3: https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/raw/branch/master/upper-constraints.txt
14:40:33 <slaweq> lajoskatona: I remember why we bumped it in neutron, it was related to specific bug with processing headers in Neutron IIRC
14:41:05 <slaweq> lajoskatona: but that shouldn't be problem IMO
14:41:17 <lajoskatona> slaweq: yes, so perhaps it should be lifted globally?
14:41:28 <slaweq> maybe
14:41:54 <bcafarel> ah https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747418/ with fixed gnocchiclient was reverted :(
14:43:46 <slaweq> so is this our pecan==1.4.0 in some conflict with gnocchiclient now?
14:45:45 <lajoskatona> and midonet what I heard about: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-neutron/latest.log.html#t2020-09-08T05:09:14
14:45:59 <bcafarel> I guess so, pecan 1.4 breaks current gnocchiclient allowed in upper-requirements
14:46:11 <lajoskatona> the strange is that other stadiums seems to be ok with it
14:46:19 <slaweq> ok, to sum-up migration to focal, we may be hit by https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1894857 and this pecan version issue is not related to focal at all
14:46:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1894857 in neutron "lower-constraints job fail on Focal" [Undecided,New]
14:46:22 <slaweq> right?
14:46:39 <bcafarel> right
14:47:12 <slaweq> so we should first focus on fixing this lower-constraint job on focal
14:47:30 <bcafarel> lajoskatona: I remember sometimes requirements checks just outputting logs and not failing on errors (at some point it was fixed in a review and we had to fix constraints file after that)
14:47:31 <slaweq> lajoskatona: can You also open LP for that midonet issue with pecan maybe?
14:49:49 <lajoskatona> slaweq: yes, I check with sorrison
14:49:56 <slaweq> lajoskatona: thx a lot
14:49:56 <amotoki> I think the related commit in pecan 1.4.0 is https://github.com/pecan/pecan/commit/54c0785b3a62bdab639283cdff95de6118b71783
14:50:11 <amotoki> it looks like midonet needs it but I am not sure the detail.
14:50:27 <slaweq> this commit was especially to fix the issue in Neutron
14:50:38 <slaweq> and that's why we bumped pecan version after Dan fixed it there
14:51:52 <slaweq> ok, lets move on quickly to the next topic
14:51:55 <slaweq> #topic Bugs
14:52:15 <slaweq> two weeks ago bug deputy was ralonsoh and last week was bcafarel
14:52:28 <slaweq> ralonsoh's report  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/016924.html
14:52:38 <slaweq> bcafarel's report http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/017054.html
14:52:47 <slaweq> any bugs You want to highlight today?
14:53:27 <bcafarel> not much on my side, urgent stuff was dealt with and other bugs have patches/people that know about it
14:53:51 <bcafarel> only one I wondered about was https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1893802 I commented as it looks similar to previous change we reverted (but I'd prefer a double-check before closing it)
14:53:52 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1893802 in neutron "Get domain name for dhcp from neutron db" [Undecided,New]
14:56:13 <slaweq> mlavalle: can You take a look at that bug as expert in this area? :)
14:56:27 <mlavalle> will do
14:56:32 <slaweq> thx a lot
14:57:57 <slaweq> any other bugs You want to quickly discuss today?
14:59:23 <slaweq> ok, if not I think we can end todays meeting now
14:59:31 <bcafarel> +1
14:59:34 <slaweq> thx for attending and have a great rest of the week :)
14:59:36 <njohnston> o/
14:59:37 <bcafarel> o/
14:59:38 <ralonsoh> bye
14:59:42 <slaweq> #endmeeting