14:00:24 <slaweq> #startmeeting networking
14:00:24 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 31 14:00:24 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:24 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:24 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:28 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:30 <slaweq> o/
14:00:31 <ralonsoh> hi
14:00:35 <slaweq> bcafarel++ :)
14:00:38 <ganso> o/
14:00:55 <bcafarel> and o/
14:00:57 <njohnston> o/
14:01:19 <lajoskatona> o/
14:01:30 <slaweq> #topic Announcements
14:01:31 <haleyb> hi
14:01:45 <slaweq> first, and the most important
14:01:58 <slaweq> please welcome lajoskatona as our new PTL for Yoga :)
14:02:02 <obondarev> hi
14:02:03 <slaweq> congtats lajoskatona
14:02:11 <gibi> \o/
14:02:19 <lajoskatona> Thank you:-)
14:02:22 <bcafarel> crongratulations lajoskatona!
14:02:30 <ralonsoh> congrats!
14:02:36 <mlavalle> congratulations!
14:02:47 <bcafarel> and thanks again slaweq for the great 2 years of service :)
14:02:51 <obondarev> lajoskatona: congrats!
14:03:17 <haleyb> congrats and good luck!
14:03:29 <slaweq> thx bcafarel :)
14:03:32 <slaweq> ok, next one
14:03:34 <slaweq> Xena cycle calendar https://releases.openstack.org/xena/schedule.html
14:03:42 <slaweq> we are in the final stage of the Xena cycle
14:03:55 <thomasb06> slaweq: mlavalle: Hello. Last week I made contact with Kendall Nelson who is the point of contact for Academia at Opendev. She proposed to me to start with OpenStaceSDK and OpenStackClient as it gives a chance to see a bit of everything in OpenStack. And there are smaller chuncks for newcomers too. So I'd rather join her on these two projects. (But as Arnold Scharzenegger used to say: «I'll be
14:03:55 <thomasb06> back.» Those were the days)
14:04:01 <slaweq> this week is Xena-3 milestone and final release for client libraries - we need to do release of python-neutronclient
14:04:39 <mlavalle> thomasb06: that's good
14:04:50 <slaweq> thomasb06: sure, feel free to reach out to us if You will need any help regarding Neutron :)
14:05:03 <slaweq> neutronclient opened patches https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-neutronclient+branch:master+status:open
14:05:06 <thomasb06> Thank you
14:05:34 <slaweq> my only question is about 2 from manub which are related to bgp speakers
14:05:51 <ralonsoh> why not in OSC? instead of n-client
14:05:52 <slaweq> do we want to prioritize them this week and get them merged before thursday?
14:06:29 <lajoskatona> ralonsoh: +1, I had a discussion few weeks ago with slaweq and amotoki: https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-neutron/%23openstack-neutron.2021-08-16.log.html
14:08:40 <lajoskatona> sorry with timestamp: https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-neutron/%23openstack-neutron.2021-08-16.log.html#t2021-08-16T12:49:26
14:09:38 <lajoskatona> the summary I think is: "so my answer to your question is to implement the support for a new feature of both CLI (OSC plugin) and bindings in dynamic-rotuing in python-neutronclient."
14:09:44 <lajoskatona> from amotoki
14:10:14 <ganso> sorry to interrupt, but "as of now, neutronclient OSC plugin consumes python bindings in python-neutronclient repo, so adding corresponding stuff to the neutronclient repo would be straight-forward."
14:10:20 <ganso> ^ is not very clear to me
14:10:35 <ganso> I heard python-neutronclient was deprecated and not accepting new patches
14:11:34 <ganso> forgot to include that amotoki mentioned the above statement I quoted
14:12:48 <slaweq> ganso: neutronclient is in fact 2 things - 1st, it's CLI client for neutron and that is deprecated
14:13:20 <slaweq> but also 2nd - it has python bindings, like SDK and that part isn't deprecated and still can accept patches
14:13:46 <ganso> oh I see, its "library" part that is consumed by other projects is still going forward
14:13:57 <slaweq> but probably amotoki is the best one to provide full explanation about it
14:14:42 <slaweq> lajoskatona: so IIUC (I didn't check those patches fully yet) those patches from manub have that "CLI" part so we don't need to merge them, right?
14:15:17 <manub> slaweq,regarding the bgp speaker related patches, it is not very urgent to merge it
14:15:29 <slaweq> manub: ok
14:15:31 <slaweq> thx
14:15:31 <lajoskatona> slaweq: agree,
14:15:40 <lajoskatona> ah, thanks manub
14:15:42 <slaweq> so we should be good to go now with python-neutronclient
14:15:55 <slaweq> thx
14:16:17 <slaweq> ok, let's move on
14:16:24 <slaweq> PTG in October
14:16:26 <slaweq> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-yoga-ptg
14:16:42 <slaweq> just a reminder: please add Your ideas to the etherpad
14:16:55 <slaweq> next one
14:16:57 <slaweq> Operators pain points: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024487.html
14:17:09 <slaweq> please read it - maybe You will want to help somehow in that effort
14:17:44 <slaweq> that are all announcements from me
14:17:54 <slaweq> do You have anything else to announce today?
14:19:05 <bcafarel> on releases schedule there was an email on missing deliverable for ovn-octavia-provider too
14:19:46 <slaweq> bcafarel: yes, thx
14:19:58 <slaweq> I proposed release today: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806716
14:20:15 <slaweq> but tbh we have 1.1.0 already released for Xena
14:20:31 <slaweq> so it seems for me like that this project was in that email by mistake
14:20:37 <bcafarel> slaweq++
14:20:53 <bcafarel> probably because 1.1.0 was too long ago compared to Xena dates (at least in the check script)
14:21:13 <slaweq> maybe
14:21:36 <slaweq> but it is in deliverables/xena/ovn-octavia-provider.yaml file in the repo
14:21:39 <slaweq> so should be ok
14:23:27 <slaweq> ok, let's move on to the next topic
14:23:31 <slaweq> #topic Blueprints
14:23:37 <slaweq> Neutron Xena-3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/xena-3
14:23:45 <slaweq> do You have any updates about them?
14:25:49 <slaweq> if not, I think I will move all of them to neutron-next now as I don't think any of them will be ready this week
14:25:56 <slaweq> so we should push them back to next cycle
14:26:04 <slaweq> are You agree with that?
14:26:39 <ralonsoh> ok
14:26:56 <lajoskatona> +1
14:27:06 <gibi> fyi nova is landing the minimum guaranteed pps series
14:27:21 <gibi> but it is OK to have it in nova even if it is not landing in neutron
14:27:40 <gibi> as nova has still support the old style port resource_request
14:28:18 <gibi> the whole thing in nova is guarded by the existence of the neutron port-resource-request-groups API extension
14:29:24 <lajoskatona> This is the series for min pps in neutron: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bp/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/neutron
14:29:56 <gibi> thanks lajoskatona
14:30:07 <slaweq> it's already pushed to the next release on neutron side
14:30:11 <gibi> ack
14:32:01 <slaweq> ok, let's move on
14:32:06 <slaweq> #topic Bugs
14:32:13 <slaweq> hongbin was bug deputy last week. Report http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024523.html
14:32:29 <slaweq> it seems from that report that it was easy week
14:32:43 <slaweq> I saw there 2 unassigned issues
14:32:46 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1941537 - API policy issue,
14:32:47 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1940950 - ovn related,
14:34:23 <ralonsoh> I think last was is addressed, at least I remember talking to Terry
14:34:30 <ralonsoh> and I think this is not an issue
14:34:37 <slaweq> ralonsoh: ok, that's good, thx
14:35:06 <slaweq> I may try to check the first one but I don't know if I will have time really
14:35:25 <slaweq> so if there is anyone else who would like to check it, feel free to assign it to Yourself
14:36:42 <slaweq> ok, let's move on
14:36:48 <slaweq> this week our bug deputy is haleyb
14:36:54 <slaweq> and next week will be lajoskatona
14:37:00 <slaweq> lajoskatona: ok for You?
14:37:50 <bcafarel> feel free to create as many bugs as possible for our new PTL :)
14:38:03 <slaweq> bcafarel: LOL
14:39:00 <lajoskatona> YOu can postpone them
14:39:19 <lajoskatona> sure it's in my calendar
14:39:24 <slaweq> thx lajoskatona
14:39:33 <slaweq> let's move on to the last topic for today
14:39:38 <slaweq> #topic On Demand Agenda
14:39:44 <slaweq> ganso: You added topic there
14:39:50 <opendevreview> Przemyslaw Szczerbik proposed openstack/neutron master: Add port-resource-request-groups extension  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/805637
14:40:06 <ganso> slaweq: yes
14:40:08 <ganso> thanks
14:40:15 <ganso> so, you partially answered my question previously
14:40:34 <ganso> now I have the impression that horizon will not be changing from using the python-neutronclient library
14:41:05 <ganso> as there may not be a reason to
14:41:57 <ganso> but just something I'd like to point out is that when implementing the change that I linked, I had previously implemented the --limit and --marker params in OSC as a test, and noticed it worked very differently than the python-neutronclient, not because of the CLI, but because of how the lib works
14:43:30 <ganso> so if horizon was to transition to use the osclib (or sdk, or something equivalent, I don't remember exactly what it uses), the logic of that patch would be slightly different, and I think the logic of some other pages would be impacted as well
14:43:54 <ganso> so my concern is whether this is in the roadmap or not, if it makes sense to ask this question here instead of the horizon team
14:45:24 <ganso> that's all I had to ask ^
14:46:02 <opendevreview> Elvira García Ruiz proposed openstack/neutron master: [OVN] Change ControllerAgent type dinamically  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/800278
14:46:14 <slaweq> You should ask about it horizon team
14:46:39 <slaweq> here maybe only amotoki would be able to give You some answer really
14:46:46 <ganso> slaweq: thanks
14:47:15 <lajoskatona> Neutron team can answer the part that ask if we will totally move everything (included python bindings) from python-neutronclient to some osc/sdk repo
14:47:16 <ganso> yea amotoki is not here today, will try to talk to him later when he is online
14:47:55 <ganso> lajoskatona: that's a good thing to know, is that planned?
14:49:23 <lajoskatona> The move of bindings is not a topic now, as we discussed previously
14:49:48 <ganso> ok, thanks!
14:50:04 <ganso> that's all I had
14:50:40 <slaweq> thx ganso and lajoskatona
14:51:00 <slaweq> if there are no other topic, I think I can give You few minutes back today
14:51:21 <slaweq> thx for attending the meeting and see You online
14:51:31 <bcafarel> o/
14:51:32 <slaweq> #endmeeting