14:00:28 <lajoskatona> #startmeeting networking
14:00:28 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Apr 19 14:00:28 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is lajoskatona. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:28 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:28 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:30 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:32 <lajoskatona> Hi
14:00:42 <ralonsoh> hi
14:00:47 <rubasov> o/
14:00:51 <amotoki> hi
14:02:04 <lajoskatona> Let's start
14:02:06 <lajoskatona> #topic Announcements
14:02:20 <lajoskatona> The usual Zed schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
14:02:43 <lajoskatona> I pushed patch for new stable releases for Neutron: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/837728
14:03:12 <lajoskatona> To tell the truth I havent checked since last week the hanging patches
14:03:18 <slaweq> o/
14:03:23 <bcafarel> o/
14:04:06 <bcafarel> lajoskatona: overall it sounds good to go right now, queue is short, I mentioned your releases patch in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/837947 too
14:04:08 <lajoskatona> And Victoria is going to EM:  [neutron] Transition Victoria to EM: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/837947
14:04:28 <lajoskatona> bcafarel: thanks
14:04:44 <lajoskatona> I saw your -1 on it :-)
14:05:23 <bcafarel> :) just making sure we do not miss the last victoria train
14:05:54 <lajoskatona> we have to be careful :-)
14:06:10 <lajoskatona> Perhaps interesting: [all][tc] Technical Committee Zed cycle Kick-Off (#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028206.html )
14:06:45 <lajoskatona> There's an etherpad for it: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker
14:07:01 <lajoskatona> things that TC will focus on this cycle and interesting for us (I think at least):
14:07:15 <lajoskatona> Gate Health, logging guidelines, testing strategy, translation, user survey
14:07:43 <lajoskatona> Perhaps there will be question what to ask in the use survey to keep it fresh
14:08:18 <lajoskatona> Do you have questions for the above topics?
14:09:02 <mlavalle> none from me
14:09:14 <lajoskatona> then next topic
14:09:17 <slaweq> nope
14:09:20 <lajoskatona> #topic Bugs
14:09:32 <lajoskatona> Report from jlibosva http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028220.html
14:09:55 <lajoskatona> I found a few bugs to check here:
14:10:13 <lajoskatona> Test tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_update_instance_port_admin_state is failing constantly since 7.04.2022 (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1968896 )
14:10:38 <slaweq> we know the culprit of that issue and liuyulong said he will propose fix
14:11:12 <lajoskatona> slaweq: ok ,thanks, I saw a revert but now I see liuyulong proposed another patch
14:11:18 <liuyulong> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F1968896
14:11:28 <lajoskatona> liuyulong: thanks
14:11:36 <slaweq> yeah, revert was mostly to just check if this is really the culprit
14:12:31 <lajoskatona> ok, there was few unassigned bugs:
14:12:40 <lajoskatona> neutron-dhcp-agent memory leak on network sync failure (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1969270 )
14:12:53 <ralonsoh> ^^ I've pushed a patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/838492
14:13:06 <lajoskatona> ralonsoh: thanks, I will check it
14:13:15 <lajoskatona> next one: [L3-DVR]l3-agent arp table will not update (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1968860 )
14:13:37 <ralonsoh> slaweq, ^ is that related with your ethernal patch?
14:14:03 <slaweq> can be
14:14:10 <slaweq> I will check it
14:14:50 <liuyulong> bug/1968860 this should duplicated to the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1916761 according to the reporters comments.
14:15:27 <liuyulong> And this https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1913621
14:16:40 <lajoskatona> thanks for checking it
14:16:53 <lajoskatona> The last one: network DHCP agent ports status is DOWN in multi network creation simultaneously (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1968859 )
14:17:23 <ralonsoh> ^ I've requested more info just to check why the ports are not being provisioned
14:17:38 <ralonsoh> and some examples of how they should be
14:17:52 <lajoskatona> ralonsoh: thanks, so we are waiting for more details :-)
14:18:04 <lajoskatona> This week obondarev is the deputy, and next week isabek will be.
14:19:30 <lajoskatona> I will send a reminder mail to obondarev to be sure, a little late, but due to Easter I just started the week :-)
14:20:02 <lajoskatona> Do you have any questions/comments for the bugs ?
14:21:04 <slaweq> nope
14:21:13 <mlavalle> I'm also just starting the week
14:21:34 <lajoskatona> :-)
14:21:43 <lajoskatona> #topic On Demand Agenda
14:21:49 <lajoskatona> I have one topic only:
14:22:10 <lajoskatona> Please check packet rate limit patches if you have some time: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:packet_rate_limit
14:22:22 <lajoskatona> I try to allocate also time for it this week
14:22:32 * haleyb had a topic
14:22:48 <lajoskatona> please haleyb
14:23:29 <haleyb> a while back I started working on completing support in devstack for IPv6 tunnel endpoints
14:24:06 <haleyb> i raised it in the #qa meeting, and we agreed to just add this option to the ipv6 template job
14:24:59 <haleyb> it would be good to have a review from the neutron team, to make sure i didn't break anything
14:25:04 <haleyb> i type slow
14:25:14 <haleyb> anyways, there is a devstack review at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/710519
14:25:54 <haleyb> it enables the tunnel endpoint in the devstack-ipv6 job description to be IPv6, and fixes usage of it throughout
14:26:10 <mlavalle> I'll take a look
14:26:14 <haleyb> i had created a neutron test patch to show it works at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/828634
14:26:37 <haleyb> the only thing i haven't done yet is create an ipv6 multinode job
14:27:04 <haleyb> that would be the end goal
14:27:20 <haleyb> mlavalle: thanks!
14:27:37 <lajoskatona> haleyb: thanks, it sounds like the cherry on top of the ipv6 goal few cycles back
14:28:44 <haleyb> lajoskatona: yes, that should be it except for the multinode job
14:29:31 <haleyb> i originally had it as a separate job but qa decided to just have one, since it "shouldn't" break anything :)
14:29:46 <lajoskatona> haleyb: I add it to my pile also
14:30:10 <lajoskatona> haleyb: the usual "one of the famous last sentences"?
14:30:18 <haleyb> yup
14:30:51 <lajoskatona> ok, thanks for bringing it here, good to know that you work on it
14:30:52 <haleyb> right before we merge the plan was to send an email to the list
14:31:11 <lajoskatona> Is there anything more to discuss?
14:31:17 <haleyb> ipv6 has been my life's work, that's all i had
14:31:19 <mlavalle> not fro me
14:32:27 <slaweq> nothing from me
14:33:04 <lajoskatona> if nothing more, thanks for the discussion, and let's close the meeting now
14:33:09 <lajoskatona> #endmeeting