14:00:26 <lajoskatona> #startmeeting networking
14:00:26 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Sep 13 14:00:26 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is lajoskatona. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:26 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:26 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:27 <lajoskatona> o/
14:00:27 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:30 <elvira> hi!
14:00:56 <rubasov> o/
14:01:03 <skoech[m]> o/
14:01:05 <slaweq> o/
14:01:23 <amotoki> o/
14:02:01 <ges> Hi!
14:02:18 <lajoskatona> I think we can start
14:02:29 <lajoskatona> #topic Announcements
14:02:35 <ralonsoh> hi
14:02:40 <lajoskatona> the usual Zed schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
14:02:50 <lajoskatona> And the weekly release mail:
14:02:55 <lajoskatona> [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Sep 12 - 16 (#link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030418.html )
14:03:10 <lajoskatona> This is RC1 week: RC1 deadline: September 15th, 2022 (R-3 week)
14:03:18 <lajoskatona> Final RC deadline: September 29th, 2022 (R-1 week)
14:03:22 <lajoskatona> Final Zed release: October 5th, 2022
14:03:35 <lajoskatona> And actually we have smoke and debris everywhere :-)
14:04:06 <slaweq> LOL, why You are so pesimistic? ;)
14:04:49 <lajoskatona> I am not, just saw the red flags :-)
14:04:55 <frickler> realistic rather
14:05:27 <lajoskatona> but back to that during the bug topic
14:05:47 <slaweq> ok
14:06:21 <lajoskatona> I would like to highlight again the importance of recheck with reason
14:06:33 <lajoskatona> see slaweq's table with fresh numbers: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-ci-meetings#L48
14:07:38 <lajoskatona> Another thing for the elections
14:08:03 <lajoskatona> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030445.html
14:08:10 <lajoskatona> you can vote for TC members
14:08:33 <lajoskatona> and we can surely say that our new PTL will be ralonsoh :-)
14:08:43 <ralonsoh> so far yes
14:08:44 <lajoskatona> Congratulation
14:09:14 <mlavalle> ralonsoh: congrats!
14:09:32 <ralonsoh> let's wait for the next week
14:09:32 <slaweq> congrats ralonsoh!!!
14:09:32 <mlavalle> felicitaciones caballero!
14:09:33 <amotoki> thanks, both for ralonsoh and lajoskatona
14:09:42 <ralonsoh> for sure, thanks a lot to lajoskatona
14:09:46 <elvira> felicidades ralonsoh! \o/
14:09:59 <slaweq> and thx lajoskatona for your great leadership through last cycles
14:09:59 <ykarel> Congrats ralonsoh
14:10:04 <lajoskatona> thanks everybody, it was really good to work with you as PTL :-)
14:10:31 <ykarel> Thanks lajoskatona for you great work as PTL in previous cycles
14:10:45 <slaweq> regarding tc elections, please remember that You need to opt-in for voting https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030433.html
14:10:59 <mlavalle> lajoskatona: köszönöm!
14:11:36 <frickler> iiuc it is too late for the opt-in now. would need to have done before midnight when the poll was opened
14:11:46 <slaweq> ahh, ok
14:11:51 <slaweq> thx frickler
14:12:23 <frickler> but then, you'll be prepared for the next cycle
14:12:40 <lajoskatona> Do you have any questions or comments for the announcements?
14:13:23 <amotoki> I think we can still activate the opt-in for the vote.
14:14:37 <lajoskatona> perhaps worth checking
14:14:46 <lajoskatona> #topic Bugs
14:15:14 <lajoskatona> Report for the week before last week from haleyb https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030364.html
14:15:45 <lajoskatona> As I checked all important bugs has owner
14:16:16 <lajoskatona> and the report from amotoki for the last week: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030456.html
14:16:33 <lajoskatona> and it really seems that everybody opened bugs for haleyb
14:16:43 <slaweq> :D
14:16:49 <haleyb> yes, it was a busy week
14:17:34 <lajoskatona> haleyb, amotoki: do you have any bugs to mention here?
14:18:47 <amotoki> nothing special from me. only unassigned bug is just a request for octavia-ovn-driver doc. the other looks invalid (as neutron)
14:19:04 * haleyb almost forgets last week, but I think all high priority were picked up
14:19:07 <lajoskatona> amotoki: thanks
14:19:29 <lajoskatona> haleyb: thanks, I had the same feeling as I checked the report
14:19:36 <lajoskatona> ok, let's move on
14:19:49 <lajoskatona> This week mlavalle is the deputy and next week rubasov will be.
14:19:56 <mlavalle> yeap!
14:20:06 <rubasov> ack, I will be ooo on Monday, but will be back and catching up from Tuesday
14:20:20 <lajoskatona> mlavalle, rubasov: thanks
14:20:45 <lajoskatona> Ok, a few words for what we have on this RC1 week
14:21:45 <lajoskatona> I think the biggest thing was that we have oslo.db 12.1.0 out and it broke almost all stadiums and causes some Neutron tests still to be flapping
14:22:06 <slaweq> yes, that's still an issue, at least with one unstable unit test
14:22:20 <lajoskatona> For Neutron unit test we have this from mlavalle: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/855703
14:22:36 <lajoskatona> but it is not a full solution
14:22:44 <slaweq> but AFAIK this didn't solved the issue :/
14:23:33 <mlavalle> I was thinking to add a reader context when we retrieve the objetcs
14:23:39 <mlavalle> and see if that helps
14:23:40 <lajoskatona> I pushed a wip to see the results in experimentaL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/856235
14:24:21 <slaweq> no, as oslo.db 12.1.0 is released and in upper-constaints You don't need to check with experimental queue
14:24:36 <slaweq> as our regular unit test jobs are failing with the same error intermittently
14:24:37 <slaweq> :/
14:24:39 <lajoskatona> slaweq: ahh ,true, it was useful last week
14:24:57 <ralonsoh> but only those quota unit tests only?
14:25:04 <mlavalle> yes
14:25:06 <ralonsoh> ok
14:25:15 <slaweq> yes, I think it's always the same test (or test module)
14:25:34 <lajoskatona> yes, as I checked the falures
14:25:46 <ralonsoh> we can discuss about it in gerrit. And the stadium projects?
14:25:54 <ralonsoh> do we have lanchpad bugs?
14:26:04 <lajoskatona> I have some patches, but no bugs
14:26:17 <lajoskatona> as finally the patches contain multiple small fixes :-(
14:26:17 <frickler> sfc and fwaas are blocking tempest plugin too afaict
14:26:18 <ralonsoh> ok, those ones sent today, if I'm not wrong
14:26:30 <mlavalle> ralonsoh: yeah, please look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/855703
14:26:33 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tap-as-a-service/+/857281
14:26:33 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/856857
14:26:33 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-sfc/+/855887
14:26:33 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/+/857315
14:26:33 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/855891
14:26:34 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/855886
14:26:38 <ralonsoh> perfect ^^
14:27:16 <lajoskatona> I started to check networking-odl
14:27:38 <slaweq> thx lajoskatona
14:28:38 <lajoskatona> please check these if you have time, I hope we can make the gate green with them
14:28:55 <lajoskatona> For ODL, I have a wip test patch, to have logs: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-odl/+/856448
14:29:18 <lajoskatona> and that's it from me for this issue
14:29:28 <lajoskatona> perhaps one more thing
14:29:58 <lajoskatona> slaweq: isn't it possible to have some discussion to have such changes released early in the cycle?
14:30:18 <lajoskatona> that would make things much easier and less complicated for the last weeks of the release
14:30:26 <slaweq> lajoskatona You mean that oslo.db recent change
14:30:27 <slaweq> ?
14:30:37 <lajoskatona> I know that few people are working on oslo things
14:30:42 <lajoskatona> slaweq: yes
14:31:05 <slaweq> I think that it could be good feedback for the TC and project leaders session during the PTG :)
14:31:15 <lajoskatona> even we worked on this sqlalchemy 2.0 topic in this cycle but we still had issues when it was really released
14:31:31 <lajoskatona> good idea
14:31:41 <lajoskatona> I fetch the etherpad and add a topic
14:33:05 <lajoskatona> Ok, thanks for the discussion and attention
14:33:12 <lajoskatona> #topic On Demand Agenda
14:33:22 <lajoskatona> Do you have anything which we can discuss?
14:33:32 <mlavalle> none from me
14:33:41 <slaweq> me neighter
14:33:44 <ralonsoh> no thanks
14:34:32 <frickler> just quickly mentioning some progress on the advanced cirros testing
14:34:50 <frickler> working quite fine except for two tests
14:34:52 <lajoskatona> frickler: good news?
14:35:02 <lajoskatona> frickler: cool thanks
14:35:20 <frickler> the bad news is that cirros currently cannot handle no-dhcp subnets
14:35:43 <frickler> though that is on the todo list, but it may take some time
14:35:51 <lajoskatona> Not fully related question: cirros is under openstack/opendev umbrella?
14:36:00 <frickler> no, it isn't
14:36:03 <lajoskatona> ok
14:36:26 <frickler> there is a fork in opendev, but for now we are continuing on github
14:36:34 <lajoskatona> thanks you for the efforts to make it work
14:37:38 <frickler> welcome. that's all from me on this, then
14:37:52 <lajoskatona> We have the CI meeting from 1500UTC, and it will be a video meeting
14:38:03 <lajoskatona> https://meetpad.opendev.org/neutron-ci-meetings
14:38:06 <slaweq> yes, thx for mentioning it lajoskatona  :)
14:38:16 <lajoskatona> :-)
14:38:22 <opendevreview> Miguel Lavalle proposed openstack/neutron master: Fix openstack-tox-py39-with-oslo-master job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/855703
14:38:26 <lajoskatona> Ok, let's close the meeting
14:38:28 <lajoskatona> o/
14:38:31 <slaweq> o/
14:38:34 <lajoskatona> #endmeeting