14:01:10 <slaweq> #startmeeting networking 14:01:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Dec 6 14:01:10 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:01:11 <mlavalle> o/ 14:01:15 <slaweq> o/ 14:01:30 <frickler> \o 14:01:32 <slaweq> ralonsoh is off today and he asked me to lead our team meeting today 14:01:48 <lajoskatona> o/ 14:02:17 <slaweq> lets wait few more minutes for others to join 14:04:18 <rubasov> o/ 14:04:28 <slaweq> ok, lets start 14:04:34 <slaweq> #topic announcements 14:04:40 <slaweq> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html 14:05:12 <slaweq> we are in R-15 and getting closer and closer to Antelope-2 milestone 14:05:17 <ykarel> o/ 14:05:31 <slaweq> which will be Jan 2 Jan 6 (in 3 weeks) 14:05:52 <slaweq> rechecks 14:05:58 <slaweq> we are good with them 14:06:09 <mlavalle> +1 14:06:24 <slaweq> please remember to check reasons of the failed jobs before rechecking Your patch and give some brief reason of rechecking when You are doing so 14:06:54 <lajoskatona> do we have this week any serious issue in CI? 14:06:54 <slaweq> any other announcements from anyone? 14:07:06 <slaweq> lajoskatona this week I don't think so 14:07:08 <lajoskatona> as I remember last week some were solved 14:07:15 <slaweq> but we hade some issue with UT last week 14:07:23 <lajoskatona> slaweq: ok cool, so I was in sync with reality :-) 14:07:53 <slaweq> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/866572 14:07:59 <slaweq> this was fix from ralonsoh 14:08:30 <slaweq> we do have some failures still, but nothng what would completely broke our gate 14:08:33 <obondarev> hi 14:09:34 <slaweq> ok, so I think we can move on 14:09:42 <slaweq> #topic bugs 14:09:53 <slaweq> I was bug deputy last week 14:09:59 <slaweq> and it was pretty busy week TBH 14:10:11 <slaweq> report is at https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-December/031387.html 14:10:31 <slaweq> There is couple of bugs without assignee: 14:10:38 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1998474 14:10:38 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1998749 14:10:38 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1998751 14:11:04 <slaweq> so if You have some time, please take a look at them 14:11:05 <slaweq> ahh, sorry 14:11:06 <slaweq> first one is fixed already 14:11:18 <slaweq> so just 2 without assignee it seems 14:13:06 <lajoskatona> the last 2 from Liu looks similar (at least both for DVR and flooding phys. bridges) 14:13:14 <slaweq> yes 14:13:19 <mlavalle> yeap 14:14:10 <slaweq> there was also https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1998235 which is duplicate of very old, and very complex to fix issue in DVR 14:14:16 <slaweq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1774459 14:14:42 <mlavalle> is that the huge patch? 14:14:52 <slaweq> yes 14:14:57 <lajoskatona> :-) with 105 iterations 14:15:00 <slaweq> started by Swami long time ago 14:15:13 <slaweq> later taken by haleyb and later by me 14:15:23 <slaweq> but I don't have cycles to continue with it, at least for now 14:16:37 <haleyb> mostly octavia having issues from what i remember. i don't have cycles at the moment either for such a large patch 14:17:47 <slaweq> yeah, mostly octavia 14:18:05 <haleyb> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/601336/ is the patch for anyone interested 14:18:24 <slaweq> and there is workaround - if You will associate FIP to such VIP address then traffic will be centralized but will work 14:18:36 <slaweq> thx haleyb 14:19:12 <slaweq> and that's basically all bugs I wanted to mention here 14:19:18 <slaweq> any other bugs You want to talk about today? 14:20:49 <slaweq> if not, I guess we can move on 14:21:01 <slaweq> this week haleyb is our bug deputy 14:21:08 <slaweq> and next week amotoki will be 14:22:05 <slaweq> if You have any problems with doing it now, please reach out to ralonsoh 14:22:37 <slaweq> or me - I can change it too :) 14:22:48 <slaweq> #topic community-goals 14:23:01 <slaweq> Consistent and Secure Default RBAC 14:23:12 <slaweq> we fixed few bugs found by tempest testing 14:23:43 <lajoskatona> is that job run for every patches now? 14:24:11 <slaweq> no 14:24:17 <slaweq> patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/614484 is not merged yet 14:24:40 <slaweq> but job with new defaults is green https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9395b0d53c8940ecb51718ba933fd1a2 14:24:44 <lajoskatona> ok, thanks 14:24:54 <slaweq> I now need to also try the same change in neutron-tempest-plugin jobs 14:25:16 <slaweq> if that will be ok, we can switch to use new defaults by default in devstack 14:26:00 <slaweq> or even change default values in neutron but I will be in contact with gmann about that 14:26:50 <lajoskatona> ok, if you need help with review or similar, just ping me 14:27:00 <slaweq> lajoskatona sure, thx a lot 14:27:09 <slaweq> next goal 14:27:10 <slaweq> Migration to Ubuntu 22.04 14:27:34 <slaweq> seems like our patches are merged and we are good now 14:28:16 <slaweq> and last one 14:28:18 <slaweq> Clean-up neutron-legacy code in devstack 14:28:22 <slaweq> I'm still working on this 14:28:30 <slaweq> patches https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:drop-lib-neutron 14:28:45 <slaweq> I still have some problems with neutron-tempest-plugin jobs on top of that patch 14:29:02 <slaweq> other than that all looks fine - tempest jobs are green, same for devstack jobs 14:29:44 <slaweq> and that's all about community goals from me 14:29:54 <slaweq> anything else You want to add/discuss here? 14:30:48 <slaweq> if not, then lets move on 14:30:58 <slaweq> #topic on-demand-agenda 14:31:03 <slaweq> I see one topic there 14:31:09 <slaweq> Reduce duplication of tests between neutron-tempest-plugin and tempest 14:31:20 <slaweq> added by lajoskatona but I think it was discussed last week, right? 14:31:50 <lajoskatona> hmmm, not sure about it 14:32:22 <lajoskatona> yeah but the summary is this, we have redundatnt tests is tempest and neutron-tempest-plugin 14:32:47 <lajoskatona> and the question what to do with them, have them only in tempest or only in neutron-tempest-plugin 14:32:56 <lajoskatona> or let everything as it is now 14:33:13 <slaweq> the best would be to have them in one place only 14:34:03 <slaweq> but I think we should sync with kopecmartin or gmann to know where each of such tests should be 14:34:09 <lajoskatona> I had one patch to move test from n-t-p to tempest (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/824440 ) 14:34:18 <ykarel> lajoskatona, is it being tracked somewhere just to get history about it? 14:34:35 <lajoskatona> yeah perhaps that is the best to check one by one 14:34:41 <ykarel> because recently i noticed metering tests are also duplicated 14:34:48 <lajoskatona> no but I can create an etherpad or such for it 14:34:56 <ykarel> but there idea iiuc was to move from tempest to n-t-p 14:35:07 <ykarel> many years back but that was not finished seems 14:35:37 <lajoskatona> yeah my feeling was also that it is half done in most cases 14:36:11 <lajoskatona> ok I can create an etherpad with what we have and we can discuss it with QA to have a common understanding and tracking 14:36:12 <ykarel> +1 to etherpad to track these and cleanup duplicated 14:36:21 <frickler> maybe you can raise that topic in the QA meeting, too 14:36:36 <frickler> (right after this one in #-qa) 14:37:08 <lajoskatona> yeah, I can, I shortly discusssed it with kopecmartin few weeks back, but I will go to him with etherpad also 14:37:24 <lajoskatona> oh, that is too quick to have a finished etherpad :-) 14:38:00 <lajoskatona> that's it for this topic from me, thanks for bringing this up 14:38:13 <slaweq> thx lajoskatona for working on this 14:38:15 <frickler> you likely have half an hour until we finish our usual agenda ;) 14:38:50 <mlavalle> we have CI meeting also 14:38:52 <lajoskatona> frickler: no comment 14:38:54 <slaweq> anyone have any other topic for our today's meeting? 14:38:56 <slaweq> if not, I will give You about 20 minutes back :) 14:39:11 <mlavalle> slaweq: CI meeting on video? 14:39:11 <lajoskatona> just one which elodilles brought to neutron channel today 14:39:27 <slaweq> mlavalle today CI meeting is on irc only 14:39:33 <slaweq> lajoskatona go on with it 14:39:35 <mlavalle> ack 14:39:49 <lajoskatona> the EOLing of q r and s branches failed for Neutron as we backported a small patch 14:40:17 <slaweq> ouch 14:40:21 <lajoskatona> and the question was to delete the branches and lose that patch, as the EOL tag is already added 14:40:35 <slaweq> what's that patch 14:40:37 <slaweq> ? 14:40:39 <slaweq> do You know? 14:40:47 <lajoskatona> https://review.opendev.org/q/Ie8dd684a7b79b0a322b1f2d17fffb4d58cfe94fc 14:41:23 <bcafarel> documentation link on EOL release, definitely sounds like something we can drop there 14:41:30 <slaweq> I would personally say - delete branches as it's only some docs update 14:41:38 <lajoskatona> +1 14:41:44 <slaweq> but I think that is the question to ralonsoh and amotoki :) 14:42:09 <lajoskatona> ykarel suggested to comment on the merged patches that this will not be under the EOL tag 14:42:33 <lajoskatona> I think we can wait with it 14:42:54 <slaweq> ralonsoh should be back tomorrow IIRC so we can talk about it then 14:42:59 <lajoskatona> I don't think that release team is just before pushing the big red button :-) 14:44:27 <slaweq> ok, with that I think we can finish this meeting for today 14:44:31 <lajoskatona> that's it for this problem, if ralonsoh is back we can ask him to have his word 14:44:32 <slaweq> thx for attending 14:44:37 <lajoskatona> o/ 14:44:41 <mlavalle> o/ 14:44:43 <obondarev> o/ 14:44:45 <ykarel> o/ 14:44:50 <slaweq> and see You in 15 minutes on the CI meeting :) 14:44:51 <slaweq> o/ 14:44:53 <slaweq> #endmeeting