14:00:36 #startmeeting networking 14:00:36 Meeting started Tue Jan 10 14:00:36 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:00:38 o/ 14:00:40 hello all 14:01:00 Hi 14:01:08 o/ 14:01:09 o- 14:01:17 o/ 14:02:19 Ok, I think we can start. Other folks can join later 14:02:28 #topic announcement 14:02:33 o/ 14:02:37 #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html 14:02:52 last week was the Antelope-2 milestone 14:03:04 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Freleases+status:open 14:03:28 If I'm not wrong, all related project patches are merged 14:03:56 n-lib, os-ken and neutronclient 14:04:49 Hi, sorry for beeing late 14:04:54 np 14:05:01 let's move to the next topic 14:05:04 #topic bugs 14:05:12 I sent the report 5 mins ago, sorry for that 14:05:21 and I still don't have a link for it 14:05:33 in any case, there is just one single bug opened last week 14:05:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2002316 14:06:02 it is unassigned yet 14:06:25 you are welcome to take a look at it, if possible 14:07:16 that was easy 14:07:50 this week the bug deputy is lucasgomes 14:07:55 next week jlibosva is 14:08:52 ok, I'll ping both later to have confirmation 14:09:02 we have nothing related to os-ken 14:09:08 so we can move to specs 14:09:12 #topic specs 14:09:32 we still have two under review and we should close then in the following 2 weeks 14:09:39 first one 14:09:41 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/867979 14:09:49 this one is, IMO, ready 14:10:03 I'll check it today and most probably +2 it 14:10:13 please spend some time reviewing it 14:10:29 ack, I feel myself guilty .... 14:10:38 I'll look at it today 14:10:47 np, just if you have some time 14:10:53 the other one is 14:10:54 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/868076 14:10:59 I need to address the comments 14:11:24 but I think is ready too (but I need to reply the reviews) 14:11:30 BTW, thanks! 14:11:41 as soon as you address the comments, I'll llok at it 14:11:59 IMO, we have done very well this cycle reviewing specs (and then implementing them) 14:12:17 +1 14:12:35 speaking about implementation 14:12:56 I recently sent patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/869554 with API definition for new security group rules templates API 14:13:03 please review it when You will have some time 14:13:39 for sure, added to my pile for today 14:13:45 thx 14:14:02 next topic then 14:14:09 #topic community_goals 14:14:15 we have two 14:14:24 1) Clean-up neutron-legacy code in devstack 14:14:30 most of the job is done 14:14:39 pending clean-up patches 14:14:46 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:drop-lib-neutron 14:14:49 I think that all is merged now 14:14:51 well, yes 14:14:59 I was looking at this 14:15:04 slaweq, thanks!! good job 14:15:15 so we can consider this as done now 14:15:23 I'll remove this topic then (and add it to the achivements of this cycle) 14:15:29 ++ 14:15:34 next one 14:15:42 2) Neutron client deprecation 14:15:52 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1999774 14:15:58 lajoskatona, you can tell us more 14:16:04 that will be long story :-) 14:16:33 one thing which is that more interesting than my strugling with code and tests 14:16:56 is that the SDK team agreed to move resources to SDK for stadiums 14:17:16 cool, nice to know this 14:17:27 that means we can have all resource classes in SDK? 14:17:31 the main argument was that sdk is used by ansible and other tools so better to have all things there 14:17:36 exactly 14:17:38 perfect 14:18:18 I started with bgp (alphabetical order :-)), but it is more WIP: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/869485?forceReload=true 14:18:37 that's it for this topic now I think 14:19:00 that's cool that we can start migrating everything to SDK, thanks for this lajoskatona 14:19:29 for sure, that will take some time, but we'll eventually have one single repo with all the information 14:19:57 btw, we can also collaborate with this 14:19:58 of course 14:20:09 we should ask first in the channel (here) 14:20:19 just not to clash efforts 14:20:31 +1 14:21:14 and that's all! let's move on 14:21:21 #topic on_demand 14:21:25 I have nothing in the agenda 14:21:38 so please, you are welcome to propose anything 14:21:58 Just a warning: this evening sometime is the deadline for presentation proposal for the summit 14:22:13 ^^^ 14:22:14 I think this is also the deadline for forum proposals 14:22:26 right 14:22:35 are the tox4 issues all resolved now? 14:22:57 so far there are no issues in the CI 14:23:08 of course, we'll find new issues in the close future 14:23:15 it's never ending 14:23:21 probably in stable branches we didn't send any patch yet 14:23:33 and we still need to fix the tox4 issues in fullstack 14:23:36 did we pin tox to < 4 in stable branches? 14:23:57 yes 14:24:00 yes 14:24:01 ++ 14:24:04 great 14:24:06 but before we install it 14:24:15 tox3, we are using tox4 14:24:25 this is why we sent patches for stable releases 14:24:42 and that's the summary so far 14:26:20 ok, we can close the meeting now. Remember we have the CI meeting in 30 mins 14:26:23 see you there 14:26:33 it will be on IRC only this week 14:26:34 o/ 14:26:36 #endmeeting