14:00:35 <ralonsoh> #startmeeting networking
14:00:35 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jan 31 14:00:35 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:35 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:35 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:36 <mlavalle> o/
14:00:36 <elvira> o/
14:00:38 <obondarev> hi
14:00:40 <isabek> Hi
14:00:42 <ralonsoh> hello all
14:00:42 <averdagu> o/
14:01:27 <slaweq> o/
14:01:41 <bcafarel> o/
14:01:49 <ralonsoh> let's start
14:01:55 <rubasov> o/
14:01:57 <ralonsoh> #topic announcements
14:02:00 <ralonsoh> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
14:02:14 <ralonsoh> This is R-7 week
14:02:30 <ralonsoh> and the election nomination process has began
14:02:36 <ralonsoh> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html#b-election-nominations
14:02:51 <ralonsoh> and this
14:02:53 <ralonsoh> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/
14:03:21 <ralonsoh> I still need to discuss in my company if I'm proposing myself again as PTL
14:03:23 <ralonsoh> in any case
14:03:40 <ralonsoh> anyone is welcome to propose his/her candidacy
14:04:10 <ralonsoh> and another reminder: in 2 weeks we have
14:04:15 <ralonsoh> 1) the feature freeze
14:04:36 <ralonsoh> 2) the final release for the client libraries. E.g.: n-lib, os-ken, ovsdbapp
14:04:40 <ralonsoh> so be aware please
14:04:52 <ralonsoh> 3) this is the A-3 milestone
14:05:29 <ralonsoh> and again, please check the openinfra presentations
14:05:39 <ralonsoh> the last one, done 1 week ago: "Large Scale Ops Deep Dive: Ubisoft"
14:05:45 <ralonsoh> #link https://openinfra.dev/live/#all-episodes
14:06:01 <mlavalle> thanks for the url ++
14:06:09 <ralonsoh> ^^ thank you folks for those videos
14:06:13 <lajoskatona> really interesting topics for the first weeks of this year
14:06:21 <mlavalle> yeap
14:06:30 <ralonsoh> yes, indeed
14:06:55 <ralonsoh> something else missing here?
14:07:04 <slaweq> ralonsoh++ for continuing being PTL :) thx a lot
14:07:21 <mlavalle> ++
14:07:25 <elvira> ++ indeed
14:07:28 <ralonsoh> hehehe let's see what happens during the next weeks
14:07:35 <lajoskatona> :-) yeah, thanks for the cycle and we are backing you
14:07:51 <ralonsoh> thank you folks
14:08:14 <ralonsoh> ok, let's jump to the next topic
14:08:15 <obondarev> thanks ralonsoh, keep going please!
14:08:29 <ralonsoh> hehehe
14:08:34 <ralonsoh> #topic bugs
14:08:41 <ralonsoh> busy week from obondarev
14:08:53 <ralonsoh> many news bugs (most of them from slaweq)
14:08:59 <ralonsoh> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031953.html
14:09:03 <slaweq> ups :)
14:09:13 <ralonsoh> we'll talk about RBAC in the next topic
14:09:39 <obondarev> not busy as slaweq usually triages bugs himself, so thanks slaweq!:)
14:10:02 <ralonsoh> right
14:10:16 <ralonsoh> there are 3 bugs not assigned or that need to be discussed
14:10:22 <slaweq> :)
14:10:24 <slaweq> I didn't assign myself to all of them but I will take them one by one
14:10:25 <slaweq> so don't worry about those related to RBAC
14:10:43 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004041
14:10:49 <ralonsoh> ok, this one is now assigned
14:10:56 <ralonsoh> (I did this list yesterday)
14:11:13 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004004
14:11:18 <sahid> slaweq: what is the one related to rbacs?
14:11:35 <ralonsoh> we'll talk about those bugs in the next topic
14:11:36 <sahid> i can perhaps help as i'm working on this area this days
14:11:45 <sahid> sorry
14:11:52 <ralonsoh> about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004004
14:11:52 <sahid> go ahead ralonsoh
14:12:05 <ralonsoh> according to the last comment, the problem is solved in Zed
14:12:24 <ralonsoh> because of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/771621
14:12:34 <slaweq> @sahid, it's not one but 6 which are marked as "High" in the email https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031953.html
14:12:36 <ralonsoh> I'll check if we need to backport this patch then
14:13:39 <sahid> slaweq: ack thank you
14:13:46 <ralonsoh> never mind, I'm checking the comments
14:14:15 <ralonsoh> and seems that the submitter of the bug was using a version that is not in upstream
14:14:35 <ralonsoh> so, IMO, the bug is not valid
14:14:44 <ralonsoh> can anyone double check that?
14:14:47 <lajoskatona> yes it seems to be Rocky or similar
14:15:05 <lajoskatona> if we speak about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004004
14:15:09 <ralonsoh> yes
14:15:18 <ralonsoh> but seems that he was not using the upstream version
14:15:25 <ralonsoh> Moreover, with respect to Florian's use case, there is already code upstream to handle such situations, as one can see in [4]. The that happened with Florian only exists because he is not using upstream Neutron version.
14:15:53 <ralonsoh> please, some else double check the bug
14:16:07 <ralonsoh> and close it if needed or propose a solution
14:17:15 <ralonsoh> the last one is
14:17:18 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003842
14:17:48 <ralonsoh> I commented in c#1: with routed networks, OVN does not support routers
14:17:59 <ralonsoh> the router port won't have an IP assigned
14:18:32 <ralonsoh> and the routes won't be set on the LRP
14:18:47 <ralonsoh> again, some else please double check this one
14:19:52 <ralonsoh> This week isabek is the bug deputy, next week will be elvira.
14:19:57 <ralonsoh> ok?
14:20:05 <elvira> ok ralonsoh !
14:20:09 <isabek> on it
14:20:15 <ralonsoh> thank you
14:20:26 <ralonsoh> ok, let's move to the next topic
14:20:35 <ralonsoh> #topic specs
14:20:41 <ralonsoh> one active review
14:20:51 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/870030
14:21:00 <ralonsoh> approved last drivers meeting
14:21:12 <ralonsoh> so please (including myselft), check this spec
14:21:23 <mlavalle> will do today
14:21:39 <ralonsoh> thank you
14:21:56 <ralonsoh> next topic
14:22:03 <ralonsoh> #topic community_goals
14:22:11 <ralonsoh> 1) Consistent and Secure Default RBAC
14:22:23 <ralonsoh> I'll post here all the bugs related opened by slaweq
14:22:35 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004017
14:22:41 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004016
14:22:47 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004015
14:22:52 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004014
14:22:58 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004013
14:23:03 <ralonsoh> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004012
14:23:10 <ralonsoh> slaweq, something you want to add here?
14:23:18 <slaweq> no
14:23:27 <slaweq> stacktraces are in bug reports
14:24:05 <slaweq> it can be easily reproduced locally if someone wants to check and fix some
14:24:21 <ralonsoh> please, if you start working on one of these bugs, assign it first to yourself
14:24:23 <slaweq> if will be working on them and assigning myself to them one by one in next days/weeks
14:24:46 <slaweq> ralonsoh++ exactly - if LP will be assigned to someone, I will simply take another one
14:24:59 <slaweq> so please assign to Yourself to avoid work duplication
14:25:10 <ralonsoh> we should have them fixed ASAP, better before A-3 (2 weeks)
14:25:17 <sahid> ack
14:25:21 <ralonsoh> slaweq, thanks for taking care
14:26:14 <ralonsoh> next one is
14:26:14 <slaweq> yw
14:26:21 <ralonsoh> 2) Neutron client deprecation
14:26:38 <ralonsoh> the most urgent patch should be https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/870582
14:26:47 <ralonsoh> that is in n-lib
14:27:05 <ralonsoh> sorry, not related
14:27:06 <mlavalle> you mean for review?
14:27:06 <lajoskatona> yeah it is not for me :-)
14:27:22 <lajoskatona> some news for the neutronclient things:
14:27:52 <lajoskatona> the SDK merged BGP and taas code, so in neutroncleint we can use that if it will be released
14:28:18 <lajoskatona> by the way SDK will be 1.0.0 with the new release (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/872206 )
14:28:28 <ralonsoh> nice!
14:28:35 <lajoskatona> and python-neutronclient merged trunk code
14:28:54 <lajoskatona> so some progress with it
14:29:28 <lajoskatona> I think that's it now, I have to go back and prepare the next wave :-)
14:29:49 <ralonsoh> thanks a lot lajoskatona
14:30:48 <ralonsoh> ok, let's jump now to the next topic
14:30:52 <ralonsoh> #topic on_demand
14:30:59 <ralonsoh> 1st topic is from elvira
14:31:02 <ralonsoh> please, go on
14:31:07 <elvira> Yes, thanks.
14:32:02 <elvira> Basically, RDO team contacted me to see if we could make proactive bumps on the libraries that we need on the RDO neutron-distgit repository, so that we don't make the gates fail
14:32:51 <ralonsoh> do you have a manual for this? what should be done?
14:32:52 <elvira> They had this problem with the last pyroute2 bump
14:32:58 <ralonsoh> how was that?
14:33:13 <ralonsoh> this pyroute2 version was in fact used by Neutron already
14:33:25 <elvira> Yes, I asked them
14:33:34 <opendevreview> Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/neutron master: [Secure RBAC] Allow network owner to delete ports plugged to the network  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/872280
14:34:00 <elvira> "One way to manage that is to send a patch to neturon distgit setting the minimal required version to what you will need. The review will fail because we don't have it in rdo. The review would fail but that would warn us aboutupdating it on Fedora and follow the workflow"
14:34:46 <elvira> That's what they said. Which I assume is changing the minimum versions for the library in this file: https://github.com/rdo-packages/neutron-distgit/blob/rpm-master/openstack-neutron.spec
14:35:16 <elvira> That way they can proactively ask Fedora for an update on their packages
14:36:06 <ralonsoh> elvira, I would ask you to collect the information, provide some examples (some gerrit patches) and send an email to the mailing list (or give me this info and I'll send it)
14:37:03 <elvira> ok! I will do it and check with you before sending the email if that is ok o/
14:37:14 <ralonsoh> perfect
14:38:01 <elvira> Just in case anyone is curious, this is their workflow for requirements: https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/requirements/
14:39:23 <ralonsoh> the next topic is SQLAlchemy 2.0
14:39:27 <ralonsoh> (sorry for that!)
14:39:41 <ralonsoh> we are bumping the version in requirements
14:39:45 <ralonsoh> and everything is broken
14:39:53 <ralonsoh> I've opened some bugs
14:40:04 <ralonsoh> these are the patches
14:40:09 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/872271
14:40:14 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/872272
14:40:20 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/744512
14:40:42 <ralonsoh> and the last one is a proposal for adding a sqlalchemy master branch job
14:40:45 <ralonsoh> well, jobs
14:40:49 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F2004265
14:41:16 <ralonsoh> I hope that with this ^^^ we won't have those surprises again
14:41:50 <ralonsoh> (please review these patches)
14:41:53 <ralonsoh> and that's all I have
14:42:00 <ralonsoh> do you have any other topic?
14:43:04 <ralonsoh> ok, folks, remember that we have the CI meeting in 17 mins
14:43:09 <ralonsoh> see you later
14:43:14 <ralonsoh> #endmeeting