14:01:25 #startmeeting networking 14:01:25 Meeting started Tue May 30 14:01:25 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:25 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:01:27 hello all 14:01:51 o/ 14:02:01 I think we can start now 14:02:06 #topic announcements 14:02:14 #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html 14:02:22 \o 14:02:30 this week is the Bobcat Cycle-Trailing Release Deadline 14:02:36 #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html#b-cycle-trail 14:02:50 and in 2 weeks we have the Vancouver summit 14:03:03 the etherpad for the summit 14:03:05 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-vancouver-2023 14:03:13 please add your topics before the next week 14:03:49 and as usual, please take a look at the Openinfra presentation 14:03:53 #link https://openinfra.dev/live/#all-episodes 14:04:07 something else in this topic? 14:04:44 ok, let's move on 14:04:49 #topic bugs 14:05:02 last week report is from ykarel 14:05:05 #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-May/033878.html 14:05:15 there are 3 pending bugs to be assigned or triaged 14:05:27 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2020552 14:05:32 trunk_details missing sub port MAC addresses for LIST 14:05:52 this seems to be an improvement in the OSC 14:06:20 (or maybe we need to modify the API response too) 14:06:22 for this i found it was intentionally done for performance reasons https://review.opendev.org/q/Ic08e4049f6156c0700ca3c7aee251b6eb0eb97da 14:06:36 I can check this one 14:06:40 right, I remember this patch sure 14:06:52 ahh ok so it is not related to recent client changes 14:07:18 hmmm I'm reluctant to add again the subport query 14:07:26 this patch was a good improvement 14:07:38 and this info can be retrieved when needed (that is not always) 14:08:13 +1 14:08:23 ok, let me comment that on the bug 14:08:57 in any case, if the reporter has a method to provide this info without loosing performance, that will be welcome of course 14:09:05 ykarel, thanks for the reference 14:09:27 ok, next one 14:09:31 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2020771 14:09:37 [ml2/ovn] Binding_host_id shouldn't be set when a port is down 14:09:47 I tried to reproduce this issue (with master branch) 14:09:52 and I couldn't 14:09:58 comment #2 14:10:14 the port host ID and the LSP/PB parameters are updated correctly 14:10:28 So I've marked this bug as invalid unless new info is provided 14:10:55 sorry, incomplete, not invalid (and was marked by ykarel ) 14:11:11 I would wait for more info on this one 14:11:46 the last one 14:11:48 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2020328 14:11:53 Concurrent create VM failed because of vif plug timeout 14:12:08 ykarel, asked for more information about this issue 14:12:19 the information provided is not enough to debug the issue 14:12:33 at this point, the bug is considered as incomplete 14:13:08 ^ that bug sounds similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2005111 14:13:50 could be similar, yes 14:13:58 but I would wait for more info in this particular case 14:14:10 we have the nova and ovn logs 14:14:13 I agree, but I will take it. 14:14:14 yes right, i saw that, and once we get the required info we can confirm 14:14:37 it could be interesting to have the neutron api logs to know the reason not to bind the port 14:15:35 something else to comment on this bug? 14:15:52 or any other bug to be discussed? 14:16:01 i have asked for neutron api logs too in debug mode 14:16:02 no. I think yatins response is good. We will wait 14:16:19 yeah, we need them, of course 14:17:19 This week mtomaska is the deputy, next week will be bcafarel. 14:17:20 there was one more rfe which was raised and is unassinged https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2020358 14:17:25 ACK 14:17:35 ack, noted for next week! 14:17:47 wasn't that from the last week? 14:18:03 is part of the bug report 14:18:34 ok, maybe I skipped this one 14:19:54 ok so this is a possible new RFE 14:20:10 I'll ask in the bug if the reporter is going to address this new feature 14:20:17 and present it in the drivers meeting 14:20:23 ralonsoh, already asked 14:20:32 and reporter is not planning to implement it 14:20:37 c#2, yes 14:20:48 he just reported based on the feedback in the linked bugzilla from slaweq 14:20:55 but I'll add the link if this folk doesn't know the drivers agenda 14:21:04 just in case 14:21:19 ok, is there, nevermind 14:21:41 so anything else? 14:22:11 ok, let's jump to the next topic 14:22:18 #topic specs 14:22:23 we have 3 pending specs 14:22:37 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/882151 14:22:43 ERSPAN and GRE mirroring for tap-as-a-service 14:22:49 that one is almost ready 14:22:58 I was reviewing it before the meeting 14:23:01 I just addressed the last comments (I hope) 14:23:07 I'll review it after this meeting 14:23:13 thanks for the reviews 14:23:16 ^^ @all, please check it, is almost done 14:23:22 Merged openstack/ovsdbapp master: Ensure LrpAddCommand may_exits works without peers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovsdbapp/+/882269 14:23:24 I'll also take a look oday 14:23:35 thanks folks 14:23:41 next one 14:23:43 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/882272 14:23:47 Port extension to create hardware offloaded ports 14:23:56 I've addressed the comments to change the field type 14:24:15 and there is an open discussion about how to deprecate the older way to create a HWOL port 14:24:24 I'll look today or tomorrow 14:24:27 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/882272/5..6/specs/2023.2/hardware-offload-port-extension.rst#b68 14:24:50 so please, you are welcome to comment there. Once we have an agreement, I'll update the spec 14:25:09 thank you all 14:25:13 last one is 14:25:16 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/859290 14:25:21 Add support for Napatech LinkVirt SmartNICs 14:25:33 I still have some pending comments there 14:25:42 but seems not have too much traction on the Nova sid 14:25:45 side* 14:25:55 please take a quick look, is an easy spec 14:26:06 unless it is enabling a very complex feature 14:26:15 is there any change from last week? 14:26:17 (that should be supported by a CI) 14:26:27 no, no change 14:26:44 in that case, I'll just keep an eye on it for now 14:27:01 mlavalle, lajoskatona and me have reviewed it 14:27:27 I think, from Neutron point of view, had good support (maybe a bit late) 14:27:37 but this folk should ping Nova reviewers too 14:27:59 ok, anything else from this topic? 14:29:13 ok, let's move on 14:29:27 #topic community_goals 14:29:35 1) Consistent and Secure Default RBAC 14:29:43 slaweq, are you here? 14:29:48 hi 14:29:53 oh ok 14:29:56 if I'm not wrong 14:29:58 I proposed one new patch this week 14:29:59 there is a pending patch 14:30:00 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/884613/2 14:30:30 Merged openstack/neutron stable/zed: Use explicit inner join for networks in port query https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/883713 14:30:35 and I want to start doing things for "service" role 14:30:42 (that doesn't need to be backported, these policies where not in previous versions) 14:31:00 cool, once you start, if needed, please share the etherpad 14:31:06 if that is possible, of course 14:31:25 sure 14:31:26 I don't know if I will do etherpad 14:31:34 maybe just propose patch to review and we will discuss there 14:31:36 I will see 14:31:38 perfect 14:32:16 ok, next point here 14:32:18 2) Neutron client deprecation 14:32:20 lajoskatona, please 14:32:32 The usual etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/python-neutronclient_deprecation 14:32:38 2 patches are hanging : 14:32:49 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/883859 14:32:56 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/880629 14:33:11 ^ there are UT errors 14:33:18 both for fwaas, the 1st one is SDK and the next is for neutronclient 14:33:33 is it installing the required SDK? 14:33:35 yes, the SDK patch needs to be merged and released I think 14:33:42 ok then 14:33:51 btw, ping SDK cores for the upper patch 14:33:58 I can have a look at that 14:34:00 I think is ready 14:34:03 thanks 14:34:09 and then check with gtema for a release 14:34:16 ^^ yeah 14:34:23 I will do it, 14:34:40 perfect! thanks lajoskatona 14:34:56 and the last topic for today 14:35:02 #topic on_demand 14:35:09 I have two points here 14:35:17 Nova is going to EOL Train 14:35:31 I know we had some people asking not to do this 14:35:40 lajoskatona I just approved that SDK patch 14:36:02 but if Nova project finishes the support for Train, I think we can do the same 14:36:09 slaweq: thanks 14:36:13 in any case, this is not an urgent topic 14:36:20 for the train eol topic here is the mail thread: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-May/033833.html 14:36:53 right, this is because of the CI and some CVE issues 14:37:00 we still don't have these problems 14:37:15 altough last week ykarel removed the funtional job 14:37:51 in any case, this is not an urgent topic for us, just a heads-up 14:38:56 the next point is the new releases of stable branches 14:39:02 the open ones 14:39:16 Yoga, Zed and 2023.1 14:39:35 I'll check what projects have new patches and I'll propose new versions 14:39:39 are you ok with that? 14:39:43 +1 14:40:08 looks good to me 14:40:23 +1 14:40:40 perfect then, I'll send a mail to make it public too, with the releases links 14:40:44 and (at least for neutron) backports backlog is quite empty for these :) 14:40:53 yeah 14:41:13 so that's all from my side, something else in this section? 14:41:45 remember the CI meeting is in less than 20 mins, in this channel (today via IRC) 14:41:50 thank you all, see you later 14:42:01 o/ 14:42:03 #endmeeting