14:00:58 #startmeeting networking 14:00:58 Meeting started Tue Aug 15 14:00:58 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:58 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:01:02 hello all 14:01:04 o/ 14:01:10 o/ 14:01:12 o/ 14:01:43 ok, lets start 14:01:50 #topic announcements 14:01:56 #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html 14:02:09 we have a 3 interesting weeks from now 14:02:25 next week is the non client lib freeze 14:02:36 and the next one is bobcat-3 milestone 14:02:52 we'll start receiving the releases patches from the releases team soon 14:03:01 in any case, we'll need to review them 14:03:14 next week I'll add all links we have related 14:03:41 and I'll also propose new stable releases this week for A, Z and Y, if you agree on this 14:03:43 late o/ 14:03:57 +1 14:04:20 next weel I'll start collecting the highlights of this release 14:04:33 and I'll push a patch for you to review, comment and add anything you consider 14:04:47 I'll ping you once the patch is uploaded 14:05:33 and, of course, the election nomination begins next week, so if you are considering proposing yourself as PTL, please be aware of the schedule 14:05:49 Am I missing something? 14:06:05 ahhh yes 14:06:14 we have a new episode! 14:06:17 please check https://openinfra.dev/live/#all-episodes 14:06:44 +1, this one was really interesting (Exploring the Intersection of AI and Open Source ) 14:07:09 yeah (I hope in 5 years I can keep my salary and my personal AI works for me...) 14:07:46 ok, let's jump to the next topic 14:07:50 #topic bugs 14:07:55 the report 14:08:00 #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-August/034739.html 14:08:10 (you boys don't rest on August??) 14:08:17 this is a quite extend list this week 14:08:34 so let's check the unassigned bugs we have there 14:08:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2031087 14:09:03 I didn't try/triagged this one 14:09:37 but I'm not sure if link local interfaces NA should be forwarded 14:09:48 I should check that with OVN core folk 14:10:01 does anyone want to check it? 14:10:16 haleyb, you have been working on it 14:10:30 Merged openstack/neutron master: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/890799 14:10:38 yes i can take it as i already tried to reproduce it 14:10:51 haleyb, thanks a lot, I'll assign it to you 14:11:07 already did :) 14:11:19 thanks 14:11:28 next one 14:11:32 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030747 14:11:45 I tried to replicate it but with no luck 14:11:53 but I think I'm mixing admin and non-admin users 14:12:17 so if you don't mind, I'll assign it to myself and I'll try to reproduce it 14:12:36 maybe (maybe) is just a problem with the policy file 14:13:06 next one 14:13:13 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030718 14:13:31 I really can't believe we can delete a network with a port created 14:13:41 but of course we need to reproduce it 14:13:49 I can check it 14:13:51 if that is the case, this is a huge problem of course 14:14:03 lajoskatona, thanks a lot, please assign it to you 14:14:27 done 14:14:31 lajoskatona, thanks! 14:14:43 (that is going fast, thanks folks) 14:14:47 next one 14:14:50 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2031085 14:14:54 based in Train 14:15:06 but could maybe be reproducible in newer versions 14:15:21 also consider we have changed the callbacks during the last cycles 14:15:27 changing the payloads 14:15:40 in any case, I'm missing some information in the description 14:15:56 for example, when this is happening, what operation 14:16:07 so I'll ping the reported to provide more info, if you don't mind 14:16:46 next one 14:16:48 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030741 14:17:06 sorry but I'm not sure what this bug is describing 14:17:36 the point is that we have a hardcoded limit of HA GWs 14:17:37 5 14:18:17 and if the selected GWs, by the scheduler, belong to the same AZ (nothing prevents from that and it shouldn't) the 5 GWs will belong to the same AZ 14:18:21 but this is correct 14:19:03 because I've been "playing" recently with the OVN scheduler, I'll ask the reported what is wrong or what is he expecting 14:19:20 because as I said, what is describing is a correct behaviour 14:19:32 any comment? 14:20:21 yeah, seems correct bahavior 14:20:27 agree 14:20:54 so, again, I'll comment on the bug because maybe what he is expecting is having GWs from different AZs 14:21:01 this is what I guess 14:21:36 ok, let's jump to the next one 14:21:41 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030735 14:21:50 slaweq, proposed two possible solutions 14:22:23 I think this could be a low hanging fruit 14:22:51 please check it and consider taking it, if you have time 14:23:13 and that's all I have!! 14:23:21 any other bug I missed? 14:23:50 ok 14:23:53 This week obondarev is the deputy, next week will be isabek. 14:23:59 on it 14:24:02 perfect! 14:24:02 o/ 14:24:06 thanks folks 14:24:33 let's jump to the next topic 14:24:35 #topic specs 14:24:38 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fneutron-specs+status:open 14:24:48 we have a pending RFE spec 14:24:52 but for 2024.1 14:25:07 of course, if you have time please check it 14:25:19 this is the one related to the OVn interconnect and the DB sync tools 14:25:34 and how to make the tool aware of the OVN interconnect resources 14:25:51 ah, and the new folder for 2024.1 14:26:12 let's wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/891342 until next week 14:26:26 once we have the bobcat release, ok? 14:26:33 agree 14:27:11 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/891204 still failing the docs job 14:28:01 because we has pushed the spec on 2024.1 folder 14:28:14 instead of rebasing the spec on top of the other patch 14:28:20 but that's a minor error 14:28:31 ok 14:28:43 ok, let's jump to the next topic 14:28:52 #topic community_goals 14:29:04 I'll skip the sRBAC section, because slaweq is on PTO 14:29:12 2) Neutron client deprecation 14:29:19 lajoskatona, any update? 14:29:50 not much 14:30:01 the usual etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/python-neutronclient_deprecation 14:30:20 the sfc sdk patch is ready I would say (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/887387 ) 14:30:29 ah yes 14:30:43 I'll check it tomorrow this one 14:30:46 there's a doc patch als ofor it: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/887193 14:30:57 please check it, it just adds the api-ref 14:31:05 ah, I think this one is ready 14:31:10 I need to make a last review 14:31:21 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/880629? 14:31:28 is the SDK patch released? 14:31:34 as a wip or PoC I checked Horizon: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/891205 14:32:16 yes for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/880629 sdk is released (1.3.0, but since than we have 1.4.0 I think) 14:32:25 so perfect, we can merge it 14:32:35 please, any other core review it ^^ 14:32:45 --> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/880629 14:33:22 ok, I'll review it after the meeting 14:33:43 For sfc any comment are welcome (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/python-neutronclient_deprecation#L40 ) For that the client patch is ready but first the sdk one must be merged and released) 14:33:49 thanks for the attention 14:34:13 I'll check the SFC part 14:34:33 lajoskatona, again, thanks for your efforts on this topic 14:34:42 +1 14:35:11 so let's jump to the last topic 14:35:16 #topic on_demand 14:35:32 we have two topics but i don't know if these were discussed last week 14:35:42 #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-August/034608.html 14:36:01 (slaweq) Do we want to add neutron-core to the openstacksdk/OSC "service-core" group? 14:36:08 did you talk about it? 14:36:12 it was discussed 14:36:13 there is a patch waiting for your approval 14:36:25 sorry, I was on medical leave 14:36:33 and I still need to catch them all 14:36:33 everyone else was +1 on it afaict 14:36:38 do you have the link? 14:36:54 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/890914 14:37:13 so perfect, you agreed on this, correct? 14:37:47 yes, just slaweq wanted PTL vote 14:37:48 Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/2023.1: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/891501 14:37:54 yes AFAIR 14:37:56 then I'll +1 it right now 14:38:00 thanks for the update! 14:38:12 and now we have more responsibilities!! 14:38:49 so that's all I have 14:38:57 anything else you want to add? 14:39:02 survey questions 14:39:15 slaweg made an etherpad, let me look for the link 14:39:17 Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/zed: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/891502 14:39:32 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-user-survey-questions-2023 14:40:01 ah yes, I need to review this yet 14:40:11 another hot topic is the unmaintained resolution: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/888771, which will affect all projects 14:40:17 one sec 14:40:30 who is going to receive this survey? 14:40:46 Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/yoga: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/891503 14:40:53 all openstack deployers are asked to take the survey once per year 14:41:11 ok so this is the Neutron part of the survey 14:41:13 and the foundation collects the results 14:41:16 perfect 14:41:20 yes 14:41:24 Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/xena: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/891504 14:41:31 I'll check it tomorrow morning, for sure 14:41:35 Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/wallaby: [OVN] ovn-db-sync check for router port differences https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/891506 14:41:48 lajoskatona, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/888771 14:42:12 yeah, to be honest there are as much opinions as people in the community 14:42:23 IMO, the documents as is now, is correct 14:42:25 exactly, it is under review, but I suppose before the new release it will be finalized 14:43:16 IMO, we can approve this document as is now and the improve these areas with flaws 14:43:29 we don't need to release a perfect "rosetta stone" document 14:44:03 I'll make a final review of it, but I'll +1 it 14:44:15 do you have any comment about it? 14:44:26 something that doesn't work for Neutron, for example 14:45:45 ok, you can also review the ongoing patch too 14:45:54 anything else you want to add? 14:46:19 i have a comment on something else 14:46:25 please 14:46:56 argh, cut/paste not working, but just noticed our check queue is broken 14:47:18 so maybe a topic for CI meeting, but neutron-tempest-plugin-openvswitch* jobs not happy 14:47:32 devstack made some changes, I can take a look later 14:48:19 so the global_venv is at work now, also support for bookworm added 14:48:31 i think it started late last week, and it's only those jobs for some reason, thanks frickler for taking a look! 14:48:50 haleyb, please open a LP bug 14:48:54 with critical state 14:49:00 good catch, by this on Friday: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=neutron-tempest-plugin-openvswitch 14:49:07 I have another question: does anyone know how to compile OVN 23.06 in devstack? I always get compilation errors 14:49:50 frickler, what errors? 14:50:00 you need to have the correct OVS version 14:50:10 let me check which one 14:50:35 ok, we can discuss this out of this meeting 14:50:41 anything else? 14:51:22 ok, thank you all for attending 14:51:28 #endmeeting