14:00:14 <haleyb> #startmeeting networking 14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Dec 5 14:00:14 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:14 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:00:16 <jlibosva> o/ 14:00:21 <elvira> o/ 14:00:23 <lajoskatona> o/ 14:00:23 <obondarev> o/ 14:00:37 <ykarel> o/ 14:00:38 <slaweq> o/ 14:01:06 <haleyb> #topic announcements 14:02:00 <rubasov> o/ 14:02:08 <ralonsoh> hi 14:02:08 <haleyb> Wanted to welcome ralonsoh back after his leave (and congrats!) 14:02:14 <ralonsoh> thanks a lot 14:02:44 <bcafarel> o/ 14:02:51 <mlavalle> \o 14:03:08 <mlavalle> welcome back and congrats ralonsoh 14:03:34 <ralonsoh> thanks 14:03:54 <haleyb> We are in C-2 and the C-2 milestone is Jan 8-12 which will come up quickly with the Christmas break 14:04:18 <haleyb> Reminder: If you have a topic for the drivers meeting on Friday, please add it to the wiki @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers 14:04:26 <haleyb> there is nothing as of today 14:05:29 <haleyb> Last Friday we had our first Review Day, thanks for taking the time for doing all the reviews! 14:05:50 <lajoskatona> \o/ 14:06:12 <haleyb> We are planning on the second one this Friday, but I realize there was a little confusion on what to prioritize 14:07:05 <haleyb> we can use the Review Priority +1/+2 flags in reviews for some things 14:07:28 <mlavalle> you set a couple of priority patches in Gerrit during the day and that worked well for me 14:07:43 <haleyb> But I also created an etherpad if you wanted to add items there 14:07:52 <haleyb> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-review-days-caracal 14:07:55 <mlavalle> I followed those. We can do something similar this coming Friday 14:08:00 <slaweq> maybe You can also advertize it more on the ML so that people would know and come to IRC channel to ask for reviews more 14:08:23 <mlavalle> the etherpad works also fine 14:08:23 <haleyb> mlavalle: ack, and yes i will send another reminder to the ML 14:08:37 <slaweq> ++ 14:08:41 <ykarel> ++ 14:08:51 <ralonsoh> +1 to this 14:09:33 <haleyb> i think we made good progress on things, merged a few of the OVN L3 active/active reviews which are a little complicated 14:10:12 <haleyb> any other announcements? 14:10:38 <haleyb> #topic bugs 14:11:09 <haleyb> isabek was the deputy this week, but i did not see a report or notice them on irc at the moment 14:11:25 <slaweq> I saw email this week I think 14:11:38 <haleyb> oh, maybe i missed it 14:12:05 <slaweq> https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/TXLIYVJZOXOOP4DNPUBI7MNUUFAVO37D/ 14:12:46 <lajoskatona> strange because I also missied it in my mailbox 14:12:52 <haleyb> strange, i definitely didn't get it either 14:13:11 <lajoskatona> but yesterday it again happened that I sent out mail to openstakc-discuss and I cant see it in the arhives 14:13:54 <haleyb> so there are a few unassigned 14:14:09 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2045415 14:14:41 <haleyb> OVN Octavia provider 14:15:23 <haleyb> froyo_: wonder if you could take a look at that? 14:15:44 <froyo_> haleyb sure 14:15:53 <haleyb> thanks! 14:16:14 <haleyb> next bug 14:16:18 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2045237 14:16:26 <ralonsoh> I think that one was addressed in https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2039550%22 14:16:33 <ralonsoh> But I'll check it again (maybe the reporter had an old version) 14:17:22 <haleyb> ralonsoh: thanks, will add that info to the bug 14:18:32 <haleyb> the next was an rfe we discussed last week 14:18:36 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2045058 14:18:48 <haleyb> we did not have quorom at drivers meeting to approve 14:19:45 <lajoskatona> but the idea is really promising 14:19:54 <ralonsoh> agree 14:19:55 <haleyb> ihrachys was going to work on a PoC after the holidays, we all thought it was a good idea 14:19:55 <lajoskatona> and used in Nova 14:20:57 <ykarel> +1 it's worth a try 14:21:12 <haleyb> those were the only bugs in the list, any others people want to discuss? 14:22:12 <haleyb> ok, just my weekly bug count 14:22:17 <haleyb> Current bug count this week: 755, down 7 from last week 14:22:26 <haleyb> so moving in the right direction 14:23:00 <haleyb> and this week lajoskatona is the bug deputy, next week will be yatin - is that ok with you both? 14:23:10 <lajoskatona> +1, I am on it 14:23:17 <ykarel> works for me 14:23:52 <haleyb> and just a reminder there is the Neutron CI meeting after this, believe it's video today 14:24:01 <ykarel> yeap it's video today 14:24:25 <lajoskatona> +1 14:24:53 <haleyb> #topic specs 14:25:04 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fneutron-specs+status:open 14:25:50 <haleyb> we still have 3 open, i will go through them after meetings 14:26:22 <haleyb> i believe we are close with them all after previous discussions 14:26:49 <haleyb> so any reviews will be good 14:27:26 <haleyb> #topic community_goals 14:27:41 <haleyb> lajoskatona is continuing with neutronclient deprecation 14:27:48 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/891205 14:28:23 <haleyb> i have not had cycles to review yet myself 14:28:25 <lajoskatona> yes, I am just working on the horizon patch, I beleive that it is close 14:28:55 <lajoskatona> the 1st patch is just to make network and subnet use sdk instead of neutronclient calls 14:29:39 <haleyb> lajoskatona: thanks for the work there :) 14:29:44 <opendevreview> Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/neutron stable/2023.2: [OVN] Enhanced external port scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/902157 14:30:01 <lajoskatona> any reviews are welcome as due to the history of Horizon I am strugling to touch as few at a time as possible and I am sure that there can be much better solutions thatn the ones I tried 14:30:54 <haleyb> ok, moving on 14:30:57 <haleyb> #topic on_demand 14:31:07 <lajoskatona> the fun is treating fields that are subnet_ids on the API but subnets in SDK, or admin_state in the APi but is_admin_state_iup in SDK :-) 14:31:47 <haleyb> :) 14:32:17 <haleyb> i forgot to remove the openapi sdk item from last week, so just your two items ralonsoh 14:32:22 <ralonsoh> ok 14:32:30 <ralonsoh> so first one 14:32:37 <ralonsoh> a regression related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1788009 14:33:09 <ralonsoh> summary: in Ml2/OVN (any related OVS backend) we need to populate the bridge of the port in the vif details 14:33:19 <ralonsoh> I'll open a LP bug to fix that 14:33:28 <ralonsoh> the second one is more complicated 14:33:37 <ralonsoh> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/OQO2C4EGYUFSGUB7F6O7K2AXOONKK4TW 14:33:55 <ralonsoh> I hope you have followed the discussion in the ML list about deprecating eventlet 14:34:15 <ralonsoh> (sorry, bad link) 14:34:18 <ralonsoh> this is the correct one 14:34:20 <ralonsoh> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/902585 14:34:45 <ralonsoh> this is a wip patch to start an overall effort to move from eventlet to something else 14:34:54 <ralonsoh> because it is not supported in py3.12 14:35:05 <haleyb> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/YO5CZDVAJ6QSF734ALWSGNOQDDAIOXKI/#RZFUTBFTUCSHKVA6SOCWWIXEH3QJHMYT was the ML thread 14:35:12 <ralonsoh> the sqlalchemy migration is going to be a joke compared to this... 14:35:26 <ralonsoh> that is just a heads-up, nothing else 14:35:29 <ralonsoh> thanks 14:35:46 <mlavalle> very interesting indeed 14:35:51 <lajoskatona> and this is the thread for it I think: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/YO5CZDVAJ6QSF734ALWSGNOQDDAIOXKI/ 14:36:04 <haleyb> ralonsoh: yes, thanks for bringing this up, just noticed the patch but will look at the timelines proposed 14:37:26 <haleyb> So py3.12 will be a D-cycle runtime afaik 14:38:12 <ralonsoh> yes, it will be needed to attend to the TC meetings to decide what will be the strategy 14:39:16 <haleyb> ok, and i see there is a meeting today at 18:00 14:40:38 <slaweq> 18 UTC 14:40:46 <slaweq> it will be on zoom this time 14:40:51 <haleyb> so just to recap that governance patch 14:41:07 <haleyb> short term: merge fixes and release new eventlet version 14:41:25 <haleyb> medium term: change openstack project to asyncio 14:41:44 <ralonsoh> medium term: create a oslo.aiohub to use asyncio and use it 14:41:57 <ralonsoh> long term: use native threads (but I don't know if we'll reach that) 14:42:52 <haleyb> right, as you said, still don't have everyone using sqlalchemy2 afaik 14:43:15 <haleyb> so moving to asyncio is aggressive 14:44:37 <haleyb> were there any other topics? 14:45:00 <frickler> the ML issue seems to be gmail refusing to accept mail from us btw 14:45:49 <lajoskatona> frickler: but I receive mails just not all 14:46:14 <haleyb> frickler: who needs gmail? :-p but that does explain it 14:46:33 <frickler> lajoskatona: seems some were dropped earlier today, currently their just getting deferred 14:46:47 <frickler> *they're 14:47:12 <lajoskatona> frickler: cool, thanks 14:48:12 <haleyb> hopefully it is fixed soon 14:49:09 <haleyb> ok, if nothing else i'll give people :10 minutes back 14:49:15 <haleyb> #endmeeting