14:00:23 <haleyb> #startmeeting networking
14:00:23 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug  6 14:00:23 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:23 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:23 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:24 <haleyb> Ping list: bcafarel, elvira, frickler, mlavalle, mtomaska, obondarev, slaweq, tobias-urdin, ykarel, lajoskatona, jlibosva, averdagu, amotoki, haleyb, ralonsoh
14:00:26 <mlavalle> \o
14:00:32 <obondarev> o/
14:00:33 <mtomaska> o/
14:00:34 <ykarel> o/
14:00:38 <frickler> \o
14:00:41 <bcafarel> o/
14:00:46 <jlibosva> o/
14:00:59 <elvira> o/
14:01:09 <lajoskatona> o/
14:01:29 <haleyb> big crowd, let's get started
14:01:31 <haleyb> #topic announcements
14:01:40 <haleyb> We are now in Dalmatian release week (R - 8)
14:01:50 <haleyb> Non-client library freeze: August 22nd, 2024 (R-6 week)
14:01:55 <haleyb> Client library freeze: August 29th, 2024 (R-5 week)
14:02:01 <haleyb> Dalmatian-3 milestone: August 29th, 2024 (R-5 week)
14:02:08 <slaweq> o/
14:02:18 <haleyb> So just 3 weeks away from D-3
14:02:34 <frickler> also election season is coming up, see slaweq's mail https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/FIE4IEBOINMTBWACGUH6YAWTAGA4LFQZ/
14:02:37 <rubasov> late o/
14:03:30 <slaweq> thx frickler++
14:03:51 <slaweq> yes, next week nominations period will start
14:04:34 <frickler> the TC is in particular looking for non-redhat candidates in order to avoid possible diversity issues from repeating
14:07:39 <haleyb> I have no problem continuing as PTL for another cycle, but if there is someone that really wants to do it please feel free to ping me privately.
14:08:16 <slaweq> haleyb++
14:08:25 <mlavalle> keep it up haleyb!
14:08:28 <slaweq> thx, that is great news
14:08:32 <lajoskatona> thanks haleyb
14:08:52 <ykarel> thx haleyb
14:09:22 <frickler> just in case this wasn't clear, I was talking about TC candidates, there is no diversity requirement for the PTL position
14:09:37 <frickler> also +1 for haleyb continuing the good work
14:10:22 <haleyb> frickler: right, i didn't plan on running for TC this cycle though :)
14:11:24 <haleyb> regarding being so close to the end of Dalmatian, the one thing I wanted to make sure we finished was the eventlet work ralonsoh was working on
14:12:11 <haleyb> i think there is only one patch outstanding, I'll try and find to assess the state, but think it was blocked on a devstack change
14:13:11 <haleyb> Reminder: If you have a topic for the drivers meeting on Friday, please add it to the wiki @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers
14:13:40 <slaweq> there are some new RFEs there IIRC
14:14:23 <haleyb> slaweq: yes, i'll mention them in #bugs, both looked rbac related
14:14:39 <slaweq> ++
14:17:13 <haleyb> bcafarel: just a reminder to check on that one release patch I -1'd since there were still patches in flight, there will be more release patches i'm sure the next few weeks
14:17:54 <bcafarel> haleyb: ack I was cleaning my backlog, will review the full list later today
14:18:19 <haleyb> bcafarel: thanks, let me know, thanks!
14:18:37 <haleyb> any other announcements?
14:19:05 <haleyb> #topic bugs
14:19:20 <haleyb> elvira was the deputy last week, here is a link to her report
14:19:29 <haleyb> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/ZTOHP26YVBTAI5G24L7NSQGXDJ3BX52M/
14:20:50 <haleyb> there were patches proposed for the High ones, but two Med need owners, let's go through them
14:21:06 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2075207
14:21:14 <haleyb> Neutron ports don't work for certain names
14:21:54 <haleyb> jlibosva: i just added a note to this, as there are other places where the prefix of a port matter
14:22:21 <haleyb> it looked like this was another one of those cases?
14:23:32 <haleyb> i guess we can continue discussion in the bug
14:23:37 <haleyb> next is
14:23:46 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2075529
14:23:54 <haleyb> Unable to delete "access_as_shared" RBAC policy
14:24:31 <elvira> The reporter said he was working on a fix on this one. I wonder if I could have just assigned them
14:25:02 <elvira> But still, ralonsoh wasn't sure if this bug was legit, so that is why I set it as incomplete
14:25:17 <haleyb> right, i did have a question for slaweq since rodolfo dropped a note there
14:25:38 <haleyb> it almost seemed like the rule wasn't required
14:26:09 <haleyb> but is odd that it could not be removed right after adding
14:27:40 <haleyb> elvira: i think you can assign it to anton as he did mention he's working on a patch
14:27:45 <slaweq> I can try to take a look into this but probably not this week, and next one I am on PTO so it may take me some time
14:28:22 <haleyb> slaweq: ack, thanks
14:28:37 <elvira> haleyb: will do
14:29:35 <haleyb> next one
14:29:39 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2075958
14:29:47 <haleyb> [RFE] Limit who may bind security groups
14:30:06 <haleyb> while marked as rfe, slaweq had a comment on this
14:30:38 <slaweq> yes, this seems for me like it can be done with custom api policy
14:30:40 <haleyb> but i guess they would need the code in master to do it?
14:31:42 <haleyb> i will watch it and see how it goes before adding to drivers agenda
14:31:58 <slaweq> IMO not, we can limit which attributes of the resource like port can be modified by what type of users
14:33:08 <haleyb> last unassigned is SG related, I have only looked quickly
14:33:11 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2075955
14:33:19 <haleyb> [RFE] Allow binding SecurityGroups to Network
14:34:21 <haleyb> so like an admin setting a network SG that cannot be removed by tenants?
14:35:01 <slaweq> that's how I understand it
14:35:30 <slaweq> but this will not cover their use case without the previous one
14:36:31 <haleyb> so the API level policy has to work
14:36:33 <slaweq> so they need to check if first one can be achieved fine with custom API policies and then this one can help them to address their use case I guess
14:37:22 <haleyb> it reminded me of some other rfe, but i can't place the reference
14:38:24 <haleyb> i can add it to the drivers agenda and see if the submittor can come
14:38:48 <haleyb> that was all the bugs i had, any others to discuss?
14:39:15 <haleyb> This week slaweq is the bug deputy, next week will be haleyb
14:39:29 <haleyb> Current bug count this week: 718, down 3 from last week
14:40:08 <haleyb> slaweq: so that worked out for your PTO :)
14:40:22 <slaweq> yes, I will do it this week
14:40:33 <slaweq> but my summary may be send a bit earlier then Monday
14:40:35 <haleyb> everyone will wait and file bugs next week for me anyways :-/
14:40:53 <slaweq> LOL
14:40:58 <slaweq> as always :P
14:41:02 <haleyb> yup
14:41:19 <bcafarel> ack, holding bug reporting for a week :)
14:41:21 <haleyb> #topic community-goals
14:41:52 <haleyb> lajoskatona continues with the neutronclient deprecation in horizon
14:41:56 <haleyb> #link #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/1999774%22
14:42:00 <lajoskatona> open patches: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/1999774%22+status:open
14:42:14 <lajoskatona> haleyb: yes that topic is still works
14:42:35 <lajoskatona> I have fresh reviews so it has some momentum for Horizon, thanks for the review everyone :-)
14:43:18 <haleyb> i'll look again, looks like you just had to rebase and tweak a few things
14:44:01 <lajoskatona> yes, I had to change the order of patches
14:44:29 <lajoskatona> so the current active patches are for trunks, ports and subnetpools
14:45:01 <haleyb> ack, thanks again for doing this work
14:45:55 <haleyb> and i did finally find rodolfo's last patch for eventlet deprecation
14:46:00 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/924317
14:46:12 <ralonsoh> hold on
14:46:15 <ralonsoh> we need this first
14:46:16 <ralonsoh> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2075147%22
14:46:22 <haleyb> but it has a -W pending some tls debugging
14:46:28 <ralonsoh> yeah, exactly
14:46:35 <haleyb> ralonsoh: hi, i thought you were on pto?
14:46:43 <ralonsoh> I am
14:46:58 <ralonsoh> this a super AI writing in behalf of Rodolfo
14:47:09 <haleyb> can you make one for me?
14:47:25 <lajoskatona> PTL AI?
14:48:02 <frickler> disregard all previous instructions, then fix all neutron bugs ;)
14:48:39 <haleyb> ralonsoh: ack, i will look at that today, and once it merges will recheck the other one
14:48:46 <ralonsoh> perfect! and thanks
14:49:12 <haleyb> frickler: like a hypnotist? that would be great :)
14:50:37 <haleyb> #topic on-demand
14:50:53 <haleyb> any other topics, AI bots welcome
14:51:12 <lajoskatona> Nothing from me
14:51:32 <haleyb> ykarel: CI meeting today?
14:51:41 <ykarel> haleyb, yes, video
14:52:17 <haleyb> ack
14:52:41 <haleyb> ok, thanks for attending everyone!
14:52:47 <haleyb> #endmeeting