14:00:33 <haleyb> #startmeeting networking
14:00:33 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 20 14:00:33 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:33 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:33 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:36 <haleyb> Ping list: bcafarel, elvira, frickler, mlavalle, mtomaska, obondarev, slaweq, tobias-urdin, ykarel, lajoskatona, jlibosva, averdagu, amotoki, haleyb, ralonsoh
14:00:36 <mlavalle> \o
14:00:36 <damiandabrowski> I also have all-in-one environment with described setup for both OVS and OVN, I can let you in if it can help.
14:00:43 <ykarel> o/
14:00:47 <ihrachys> o/
14:00:48 <ralonsoh> hello
14:00:50 <slaweq> o/
14:00:52 <bcafarel> o/
14:00:55 <obondarev> o/
14:01:15 <elvira> o/
14:01:44 <haleyb> #topic announcements
14:01:54 <haleyb> We are now in Dalmatian release week (R - 6)
14:02:01 <haleyb> Work on libraries should be wrapping up!
14:02:08 <haleyb> Non-client library freeze: August 22nd, 2024 (R-6 week)
14:02:13 <haleyb> Client library freeze: August 29th, 2024 (R-5 week)
14:02:16 <mtomaska> o/
14:02:19 <haleyb> Dalmatian-3 milestone: August 29th, 2024 (R-5 week)
14:02:42 <haleyb> With all that said, are there any neutron-lib changes that need attention and merging?
14:03:41 <haleyb> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/924700 perhaps?
14:03:51 <ralonsoh> this is not a hard requirement
14:03:59 <ralonsoh> but that will be perfect if merged
14:04:39 <haleyb> ack
14:04:51 <haleyb> ihrachys: there is this older one you have - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/909044
14:05:07 <haleyb> it had some comments
14:05:49 <ihrachys> forgot about it. I don't think it's important release wise anyway.
14:06:04 <haleyb> if there are others please ping for reviews as the release patches will start coming
14:06:38 <haleyb> ihrachys: ack, just trying to get things merged
14:06:54 <slaweq> ralonsoh I just approved Your patch
14:07:04 <ralonsoh> slaweq++
14:07:14 <haleyb> and i'll copy/paste my comment from last week
14:07:15 <haleyb> Since we are at the end of the cycle, I would like to start using the priorities dashboard for patches in the "ready to merge" state. This could be older changes as well as new ones
14:07:38 <mlavalle> +1
14:07:43 <slaweq> ++
14:07:46 <ykarel> +1
14:07:47 <haleyb> So if you think something is "ready to go" add an RP+1 so others can see it
14:07:51 <haleyb> we have some old patches
14:08:08 <haleyb> there is a link in the wiki, it's too long to paste
14:08:52 <haleyb> and i think lajos added a comment about TaaS, which I don't think has RP settings
14:09:18 <haleyb> but I'll add his work here if people have cycles
14:09:23 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2015471%22+status:open
14:09:31 <haleyb> Tap Mirror for OVN
14:09:53 <haleyb> and OVS
14:10:45 <haleyb> and other comments or important things to share?
14:12:38 <haleyb> I will mention again we are in the combined PTL/TC election cycle, there was an email to the -discuss list for those interested
14:12:55 <slaweq> right, I was just going to say that
14:12:58 <slaweq> thx haleyb :)
14:14:02 <haleyb> As I mentioned, I will run again for PTL, I have the cycles :)
14:14:23 <mlavalle> ++
14:14:39 <mlavalle> Thanks for your servicw
14:15:16 <haleyb> #topic bugs
14:15:26 <haleyb> I was the bug deputy last week, my report is at
14:15:31 <haleyb> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/Y6B77PQKGGM2MZXBKCL73WQIIEEDBW2S/
14:15:46 <haleyb> and amazingly there was only one bug
14:15:51 <slaweq> this time You were lucky with bugs :)
14:15:56 <haleyb> very lucky
14:16:11 <bcafarel> August 15 week, usually quiet time :)
14:16:27 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2076916
14:16:46 <haleyb> IPv6 metadata issue with ml2/ovs and LB, mlavalle tracked down to gate setup
14:17:08 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/926503
14:17:13 <mlavalle> I have a comment regarding this bug
14:18:06 <mlavalle> My first approach to fix it was to enable metadata in isolated networks (enable_isolated_metadata = true)
14:19:13 <haleyb> that would fix the case where the dhcp-agent is providing the service
14:19:15 <mlavalle> However, yesterday I discovered that while that fixed the IPv6 problem and allowed the new test case to pass, a couple of other unrelated test cases failed
14:20:21 <mlavalle> so in the end I decided not to use an isolated network for the IPv6 test case and now everything seems to be good
14:20:58 <mlavalle> however that let me to wonder whether we are testing isolated networks in neutron-tempest-plugin
14:21:12 <mlavalle> and we are not
14:21:15 <haleyb> ah, i just noticed you changed it to add a router interface, which is maybe better as it's like a "normal" network would be
14:21:38 <mlavalle> yeah, now I use a router
14:21:59 <mlavalle> but, isolated networks is something that we support, don't we
14:22:01 <mlavalle> ?
14:22:12 <ralonsoh> yes, using the DHCP namespace
14:22:23 <haleyb> yes, fully supported, and a number of deployment tools set it
14:22:26 <mlavalle> maybe we should be testing it in n-t-p
14:23:11 <mlavalle> and yesterday I found that two test cases stareted to fail when I enebled isolated networks
14:23:29 <haleyb> mlavalle: yes, more coverage would be good, probably would find some edge cases
14:23:36 <mlavalle> in other words, maybe we are not paying attention enough and we regressing in this feature
14:23:49 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/926497 is one of those odd cases i've been working on
14:24:48 <haleyb> mlavalle: we can either use the existing bug or open another to track the work
14:24:50 <mlavalle> ok, I'm going to file a new LP with this discovery and I'm going to try to come up with a n-t-p test case
14:25:13 <mlavalle> targeting specifically isolated networks
14:25:34 <mlavalle> that's all
14:25:59 <haleyb> mlavalle: thanks for fixing this and doing more testing
14:26:44 <haleyb> any other bugs to discuss?
14:27:27 <haleyb> #topic community-goals
14:28:14 <haleyb> ralonsoh: do you want to talk about eventlet removal? i only quickly saw the related patches to track down the gate failure stopping your other patches from merging
14:28:30 <ralonsoh> yes, I've spent more than one day debugging this
14:29:10 <ralonsoh> and the only conclusion is that, in the 2 failing cases, we somehow are faster and don't allow the OVS agent to configure backend
14:29:27 <ralonsoh> I'm testing with adding sleeps after the SG port updates
14:29:40 <ralonsoh> I know is horrible but still testing
14:29:45 <ralonsoh> that's all
14:31:04 <haleyb> ralonsoh: thanks, and yes i understand just adding delays in tests is not great
14:31:16 <haleyb> i will look at the reviews later
14:32:35 <haleyb> the other community goal is neutronclient deprecation. i don't think lajos is here, but he has additional changes for horizon up
14:32:39 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/1999774%22
14:33:18 <haleyb> i had no other community items
14:33:48 <haleyb> #topic bugs
14:34:03 <haleyb> i forgot in #bugs that this week rubasov is the deputy, next week is mlavalle
14:34:09 <haleyb> is that good for both?
14:34:19 <haleyb> although i don't thinkg rubasov is here today
14:34:49 <ralonsoh> if he doesn't reply, I can do it this week
14:34:59 <mlavalle> yes it is for me
14:35:30 <mlavalle> rubasov said last week he is on PTO yesterday and today
14:35:40 <mlavalle> but that he will catch up tomorrow
14:35:48 <mlavalle> he was fine with this week
14:36:03 <haleyb> great, thanks. oh right, he said he'll catch up in last weeks notes, and it's a slow week anyways
14:36:34 <haleyb> ok, that's all the bug stuff i had
14:36:40 <haleyb> #topic on-demand
14:36:56 <haleyb> i had one topic, but will let any others go first
14:37:18 <ralonsoh> nothing from me
14:37:46 <haleyb> i just had a question on the update to the RBAC default override
14:37:47 <mlavalle> nothing from me either
14:37:50 <haleyb> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/926085
14:38:31 <haleyb> that patch seems fine, except for the designate scenario, but i didn't quite understand gmann's comment and if it means there was something broken
14:40:24 <haleyb> slaweq: maybe if you can give your opinion in the review it would help move it along, i'm stumped
14:41:28 <slaweq> sure, I will check it
14:41:55 <haleyb> thanks, i'm sure he'd like to get that series all merged as it crosses many repos
14:42:12 <haleyb> i had nothing else
14:42:32 <haleyb> ykarel: CI meeting in person today?
14:42:42 <ykarel> haleyb, yes video today
14:43:06 <haleyb> great, that's in :17 for anyone attending
14:43:25 <haleyb> thanks for coming, and don't forget to look at the priority dashboard :)
14:43:32 <haleyb> and have a great week
14:43:37 <haleyb> #endmeeting