18:37:51 #startmeeting Networking FWaaS 18:37:52 Meeting started Wed Jul 23 18:37:51 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:37:53 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:37:56 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_fwaas' 18:37:58 pcm___: hi 18:38:07 pcm___: thanks for joining as well 18:38:22 sure np. Someone has to keep an eye on you guys :) 18:39:03 pcm___: thanks for carrying out that imp task! perhaps you will extend it to the reviews as well ;-) 18:39:13 #info spec approval deadline has passed 18:39:14 yup 18:39:30 i think we managed to get the specs approved that we had planned 18:39:34 anything we missed 18:39:35 ? 18:39:47 thanks sumit 18:39:52 badveli: sure 18:40:28 if we missed something, and you want to petition for an exception, please send an email to the mailer 18:40:39 although the chances of getting an exception are pretty slim 18:40:43 ok moving on 18:40:52 #topic action item review 18:41:25 i was planning to set up a f2f with Swami 18:41:43 Yes sumit. 18:41:53 Are you guys on for the meet, I did not hear anything from you. 18:41:56 badveli beyounn garyduan, what say, one day we drive to sacramento? 18:42:22 Swami: still convincing people to make the trip :-) 18:42:26 ah 18:42:29 Swami: we will get back to you on this 18:42:54 SumitNaiksatam: Sure 18:43:02 #action fwaas team to discuss f2f team with DVR team 18:43:45 another action item was for Swami to bring up the FWaaS/DVR spec in the L3 meeting to pave the way for approval 18:43:51 so we are good on this as well 18:44:11 cool 18:44:16 Swami and team, thanks again for all the last minute interaction and for pushing this forward 18:44:56 yes the meetings really helped in finalizing the spec 18:45:06 the third action was for garyduan to provide an estimate on supporting flavors for fwaas and provide an update (in response to salvatore’s comment) in the flavors bp spec 18:45:16 natarajk: +1 18:45:57 garyduan please follow up in case you havent 18:46:10 #topic Bugs 18:46:53 one pending bug was reduced in severity from high to medium 18:47:01 we still need to review 18:47:26 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90575 18:48:01 any other bugs that caught anyone’s attention? 18:48:16 I did comment on both falvor spec and patch 18:48:30 SumitNaiksatam: I'll review bug 90575 18:48:46 garyduan: great 18:48:50 natarajk: thanks 18:49:15 BTW, our bug Czar - SridarK is out today 18:49:46 but SridarK did a pass yesterday and reported that he did not find anything which was critical 18:49:53 badveli: i believe you are also looking at this? 18:50:03 yes i followed that link 18:50:04 badveli: i mean scrubbing bugs? 18:50:26 i looked at the link some days back 18:50:36 badveli: ok great, good to have multiple keep an eye on this 18:50:53 currently submitting a patch for the comments i have for service groups 18:50:59 #topic blueprint tracking 18:51:01 i will take a look at it again 18:51:09 badveli: thanks 18:51:26 FWaaS/DVR support 18:52:05 badveli: SridarK mentioned you were trying to get an installation going 18:52:22 badveli: i mean just the DVR installation 18:53:24 Guys there was fix that went in for the FIP yesterday in the L3 agent, I recommend you to restack with the latest code for testing. 18:53:41 Swami: thanks for the heads up 18:53:51 sridar asked if i have two servers, but we did not yet discussed on it 18:53:52 Swami: so its merged, right? 18:54:02 Yes will be merged anytime soon. 18:54:06 It is ready to be merged. 18:54:11 Swami: that said i believe we were earlier pointed to a private repo earlier 18:54:13 But you can still pick up from Carl's repo 18:54:20 Swami: ah my question 18:54:26 All patches have not landed up in the upstream 18:54:37 Swami: so we continue to go to Carl’s repo? 18:54:40 for now 18:54:42 That is the reason we recommend to pick up from Carl's repo, that is updated constantly. 18:54:50 sumit: yes 18:54:51 Swami: okay good 18:55:11 Swami: so does Carl’s repo have the entire implementation, or that is also evolving? 18:55:12 SumitNaiksatam: I need to step out, if you need any other information please let me know offline. 18:55:29 Swami: ok we will ping you, thanks for joining 18:55:30 SumitNaiksatam: Carl's repo has the entire code base. 18:55:37 Swami: ok 18:55:57 Thanks sumit 18:56:24 badveli: sorry, did not notice your earlier response 18:56:46 badveli: so you are planning to start installing the DVR in parallel? 18:57:02 no problem, i am trying to study on the wiki on how to install 18:57:36 badveli: great, i think that will be very helpful preparation until SridarK comes back, so that we can make some immediate progress after he is back 18:57:51 ok anything more on FWaaS/DVR? 18:58:00 sumit, i am actively working on the patches for the service groups 18:58:08 yes, thats next 18:58:13 Service Objects/Groups 18:58:23 badveli: any blockers there? 18:58:58 i will be submitting a patch for the db part addressing comments and also some of the spec's latest updates 18:59:34 the reference implementation is another patch which is wip 19:00:16 thanks for your help, if we can get the cli and the configs part reviewed 19:00:35 the data modelling 19:00:55 badveli: sure, but the CLI review will typically happen in earnest after the neutron pathces are in a good stage 19:01:13 badveli: but yeah we need to keep working on them in parallel, so that people can test end to end 19:02:26 sumit: can it happend that the cinfig and the db patches will be merged 19:02:29 badveli: i am behind on the reviews for code patches 19:02:38 badveli: links? 19:02:44 before the cli patch 19:02:59 i send the email, 19:03:03 oh btw, can you all please update: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/FWaaS/JunoPlan 19:03:27 whenever you post a patch 19:03:40 fine sumit 19:04:09 badveli: i meant can you paste the links here for the benefit of those in this meeting 19:04:20 yes sumit will do it 19:04:28 badveli: in terms of review and merging, the expectation is as follows 19:04:42 1. the patches should be small 19:05:14 2. if the feature is large, the patches should be broken into relatively self-contained parts in the form of a series 19:05:37 in this case, Resource model/API, and DB can be one patch 19:05:57 plugin/agent/driver can be a second patch 19:06:13 depending on the size, if they turn out to be too large, we wil have to break them further 19:06:20 Sumit: We are doing exactly the same way 19:06:46 3. for a feature to merge, the refer implementation (that goes all the way to the datapath) should be available for review 19:06:48 There will be some overlap with the flavor support, as both touch fwaas plugin 19:06:51 and testing 19:06:56 theResource model/API, and DB is one patch and the plugin/agent/driver is another patch in wip 19:07:05 badveli: great 19:07:10 badveli: will take a look 19:07:47 badveli: to your earlier question, the neutron patches will merge before the CLI patches 19:08:03 badveli: i did not quite understand what you meant by the config patches 19:08:19 garyduan: agreed, for now i would say lets not create dependencies 19:08:46 garyduan: i think we can take the hit of resolving merge conflicts in the interest of letting these proceed in parallel 19:08:54 sure. should be easy to resolve 19:08:57 sumit, the one for theResource model/API, and DB 19:09:00 garyduan: good 19:09:14 badveli: ah, yeah, we will get to that first 19:11:12 badveli: as a reference, please pay careful attention to the reviews that went if for the initial fwaas patches 19:11:54 badveli: if we avoid the issues present there, i think it will reduce the time we spend on these reviews 19:12:17 ok moving on 19:12:27 #topic vendor blueprints 19:12:51 sumit, sure i am addressing 19:12:55 SridarK is not here 19:12:57 badveli: thanks 19:13:15 SumitNaiksatam: i'll file the design spec for brocade plugin once kilo spec repository opens 19:13:16 natarajk: and you mentioned that your stuff is targeted for K? 19:13:28 natarajk: nice, keep us posted 19:13:41 #topic open discussion 19:13:54 anything else we need to discuss today? 19:13:55 SumitNaiksatam: Focusing on getting the l3 plugin approved for Juno-3 19:14:12 natarajk: yes sure, it was great that the spec was approved! 19:14:17 SumitNaiksatam: Thanks for your support 19:14:24 natarajk: always! 19:14:50 ok if no more issues to be discussed today, then we get 15 mins back :-) 19:15:15 ok thanks all for joining 19:15:19 bye! 19:15:21 bye 19:15:24 #endmeeting