18:32:05 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting Networking FWaaS
18:32:05 <SridarK> Hi All
18:32:06 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Dec 10 18:32:05 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:32:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:32:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_fwaas'
18:32:35 <SumitNaiksatam> #info the Spec Approval deadline is 12/15
18:32:43 <SumitNaiksatam> #info Kilo-1 is 12/18
18:33:32 <SumitNaiksatam> #info Services’ split is underway, and FWaaS plugin and driver artifacts are in a separate repo
18:34:14 <SumitNaiksatam> we will try to focus on the discussion related to the split, and try to keep it short so as to allow people to go back and participate in the split related effort
18:34:42 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic FWaaS code split and work items
18:35:19 <SumitNaiksatam> the currently documented list of outstanding items is identified here: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/services_split
18:37:02 <SumitNaiksatam> btw, the new code repository is: #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-fwaas
18:37:35 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i am looking at the UT re-enabling - i think i need the alembic changes ?
18:37:59 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: yeah
18:38:10 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i saw ur comment in brandon's spec
18:38:13 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: i tested the two alembic patches yesterday
18:38:26 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: however that does not have the actual migrations
18:38:27 <SridarK> i am patching soon and will keep on the UT
18:38:48 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: ok good
18:38:52 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i was a little confused on the interaction with neutron there
18:39:00 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: go ahead
18:39:04 <SridarK> but hopefully for UT - it may work
18:39:34 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: so if i patch in brandon's fwaas alembic changes is that good enough
18:39:44 <SridarK> to get UT moving
18:40:02 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: actually i am not sure that is required for the UT to work
18:40:24 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: ok hmm that was my thought initially - but ran into some issues
18:40:32 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: when we run UTs, we dont run the alembic migration, the DB models are loaded into in memory db
18:40:37 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: anyways let me bang on this more and i will reach out
18:40:46 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: exactly that was my understanding too
18:41:01 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: the reason the alembic migrations are required is because the gate will not work without those
18:41:13 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: yes for sure
18:41:33 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: and they need the gate to work for the pending patches to merge
18:41:55 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: i think they have temporarily disabled the gate on the services’ tests
18:42:15 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: ok i was trying to get some things going in parallel so if there are issues - we will be ready with the alembic stuff, then devstack changes all go in
18:42:29 <SridarK> * we will be ready when
18:42:57 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam:  let me bang on this some more and i will ping u later
18:43:10 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: yes absolutely
18:43:21 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: thanks
18:43:23 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: there was a patch in the morning to fix a path in the varmour UTs
18:43:28 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: did you pick that up?
18:43:36 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: hmm no
18:43:44 <SridarK> I will look
18:43:55 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: this the latest commit on the tree: #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-fwaas/commit/?id=a3000c57f42f3a6818545edee1993a393d781c4a
18:45:56 <badveli> hello all
18:46:03 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i believe i have just picked it up in my new refresh
18:46:06 <badveli> sorry my inetrent was down a bit
18:46:11 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: thanks
18:46:14 <SridarK> badveli: hi
18:46:17 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: cool
18:46:21 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: np
18:46:22 <badveli> hello sridark
18:46:26 <badveli> hello sumit
18:46:45 <SumitNaiksatam> i am little confused by this: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140572/4/lib/neutron_plugins/services/firewall
18:47:25 <SumitNaiksatam> since we still have shims in neutron to the service plugins: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140515/5/neutron/services/firewall/fwaas_plugin.py
18:47:55 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i looked at this - thought this is just the path to our plugin
18:48:19 <SridarK> devstack uses this to set up neutron.conf i believe
18:49:26 <SridarK> so u think with shims this is not needed ?
18:49:51 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: yeah i would think so
18:49:59 <SumitNaiksatam> i have put my comment
18:50:19 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: ok
18:51:30 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: anything else that is in flight that we havent covered with regards to the split?
18:51:42 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: none that i know off
18:51:55 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i am sure things will pop up
18:51:56 <badveli> i have not yet cloned the repository
18:52:04 <SumitNaiksatam> the migration scripts will have to be moved
18:53:10 <Swami> have anyone tested with the new split
18:53:38 <SridarK> Swami: not quite there yet
18:53:39 <badveli> no
18:53:59 <SumitNaiksatam> Swami: the UTs are currently disabled
18:54:03 <Swami> ok
18:55:07 <SumitNaiksatam> the service repos however have a reference to the neutron repos
18:55:26 <SumitNaiksatam> so the neutron imports should work
18:56:22 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: so what was the error you were seeing?
18:57:31 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: the error was related to FirewallRules table -
18:57:51 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: i am trying to work thru one set of tests
18:58:07 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: but i have not started a new run with an updated tree
18:58:23 <SridarK> SumitNaiksatam: let me do that first before raising some false alarms
18:58:52 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: okay sure
18:59:09 <SumitNaiksatam> anyone have questions on the split, or in general?
18:59:27 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Docs
18:59:45 <SumitNaiksatam> Swami: just a check, anything more needed from our end on the DVR doc?
18:59:58 <SumitNaiksatam> in last week’s meeting we had a couple of suggestions
19:03:00 <SumitNaiksatam> okay perhaps Swami is not around
19:03:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Bugs
19:03:26 <SumitNaiksatam> I did not notice any new bugs (apart from the ones we are dealing with on the services’ split)
19:03:36 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: badveli: anything show up on your radar?
19:03:54 <SridarK_> sorry got bounced out and have rejoined
19:04:17 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK: ah, i thought i was on the wrong side of the network split! :-)
19:04:33 <SridarK_> SumitNaiksatam: :-)
19:04:46 <Swami> SumitNaiksatam: sorry I missed your comment.
19:04:53 <Swami> I think for now we are ok.
19:04:54 <SumitNaiksatam> Swami: no worries
19:05:00 <SumitNaiksatam> Swami: ok great
19:05:23 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK_: badveli: any new critical bugs you noticed?
19:05:34 <SridarK_> SumitNaiksatam: nothing new
19:05:41 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK_: okay
19:05:42 <badveli> 
19:05:53 <badveli> nothing major
19:06:15 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: anything less than major but new?
19:07:18 <badveli> i did not find anything
19:08:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Blueprints/Specs
19:08:29 <SumitNaiksatam> as mentioned earlier 12/15 is the deadline to get the pending specs approved
19:09:19 <SumitNaiksatam> our community specs under review: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138672/ (firewall router association)
19:09:32 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94133 (service objects)
19:10:04 <SumitNaiksatam> ah sorry that last link is incorrect
19:10:10 <SumitNaiksatam> i got excited for a min!
19:10:21 <badveli> yes
19:11:08 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/131596 (service groups)
19:11:29 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: what about the DVR E-W traffic?
19:11:37 <badveli> yes we have it
19:11:38 <badveli> 
19:11:46 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: link?
19:11:55 <badveli> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140222/
19:12:23 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: ah good
19:12:42 <SridarK_> SumitNaiksatam: on the router association,  thanks for ur review, others - could really use some more comments - we have discussed this quite a bit so hopefully there are no major surprises
19:13:11 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK_: yeah, will give it another read, thanks for your deligence
19:13:17 <natarajk> i also reviewed the router association spec. Looks good
19:13:23 <SridarK_> SumitNaiksatam: thanks
19:13:27 <SridarK_> natarajk: thanks
19:13:32 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: it was great that you could meet the proposal deadline
19:13:41 <badveli> thanks sumit
19:14:01 <Swami> badveli: thanks for putting together the blueprint spec out.
19:14:14 <badveli> thanks swami
19:14:18 <SumitNaiksatam> Swami: thanks for the technical discussion and options provided!
19:14:33 <SumitNaiksatam> on the vendor blueprints
19:14:52 <SridarK_> we have: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129836/
19:15:13 <SridarK_> thanks to multiple review comments - thanks folks
19:15:23 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: can you update the wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/FWaaS#Blueprint_Tracking
19:15:35 <SumitNaiksatam> with the propose links to your two specs?
19:15:42 <SumitNaiksatam> SridarK_: thanks
19:15:57 <SumitNaiksatam> the second one is vishwanathj’s: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136953/
19:16:02 <badveli> yes sumit
19:16:18 <SumitNaiksatam> and we have two from RuiZang, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134198/ #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91286/
19:16:31 <SumitNaiksatam> vishwanathj: RuiZang: i will try to get to those soon
19:16:40 <RuiZang> SumitNaiksatam: thanks
19:16:42 <SridarK_> vishwanathj: thanks for addressing comments - have a few more minor clarifications - pushing that out in a few mins - after that i think i am good
19:16:49 <vishwanathj> SumitNaiksatam, Thanks
19:16:59 <SridarK_> RuiZang: i will also take a look
19:17:05 <vishwanathj> SridarK, I will upload a new spec based on your comments.
19:17:12 <RuiZang> SridarK_:  thanks
19:17:27 <vishwanathj> RuiZang, Please take a look at Brocade spec and I will look at yours as well
19:17:37 <RuiZang> vishwanathj:  sure thing ;)
19:18:37 <SumitNaiksatam> anything spec to discuss in the context of any of the above specs (i belive we have 3 + 4 = 7 specs in review)
19:19:45 <badveli> we have not yet heard anything from mark about the mail that gregory had send out
19:20:08 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: okay
19:20:32 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: thanks for that update!
19:20:39 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
19:20:46 <badveli> i am not sure what would be the next steps, they had mentioned initially a security group reviewer and an api reviewere
19:20:59 <badveli> 
19:21:07 <badveli> what would be our next steps?
19:21:11 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: yeah, i am not sure either, i guess we just have to keep trying
19:21:57 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: i think the process that was asked to be followed has been followed
19:22:06 <badveli> yes sumikt
19:22:15 <badveli> thanks sumit
19:22:19 <SumitNaiksatam> anthing else that anyone wants to bring up for today!
19:22:26 <SumitNaiksatam> badveli: thanks for your persistence on that
19:23:18 <badveli> thanks sumit, and all the reviewers
19:24:15 <SumitNaiksatam> alrigth, thanks all!
19:24:18 <SumitNaiksatam> bye
19:24:20 <vishwanathj> bye
19:24:22 <SridarK_> Ok Bye
19:24:23 <RuiZang> bye
19:24:26 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting