18:01:22 #startmeeting networking_l2gw 18:01:23 Meeting started Mon Jan 19 18:01:22 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:01:26 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_l2gw' 18:01:34 #topic: Agenda 18:01:42 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway#Agenda 18:01:54 #topic: Announcements: 18:02:26 I thought I ask armax to give an overview update 18:02:44 Sukhdev: sure, from my end I have been looking at the code under review 18:03:08 since the last time we spoke, we have another couple of rounds on the API blueprint proposal 18:03:19 hello 18:03:53 Link to API proposal spec is here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144173/ 18:03:55 there were some comments from a few folks interested in the project that a wiki would be useful to pinpoint use cases 18:04:08 we are or are not interested in 18:04:16 in the short and/or medium term 18:04:48 Sukhdev and ijw were tasked to come up with it, so Sukhdev perhaps you can give us an update on that 18:05:04 having said that, the code has started 18:05:24 pouring in so we need reviewers to help us fleshing out as many issues as we can 18:05:41 armax: yes, I was suppose to kick start the wiki - I have not been able to make much progress on it - 18:06:08 armax: few critical customer issues popped up and consumed most of time - but, will get it going soon 18:06:22 the initial implementation is targeting hardware vtep schema running on external elements, like switches, however we’d want to address the pure software play too 18:06:50 and for that we need volunteers, see Sukhdev I jumped all the way to the end of the agenda :) 18:07:02 armax: I noticed :-) 18:07:28 But, we will go through it item by item anyways 18:07:35 sorry for the brief detour, let’s go back…that’s it from me…I’ll keep on reviewing the code 18:07:52 #topic: Patches under review 18:08:07 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/networking-l2gw,n,z 18:08:17 we have many additional patches - 18:08:39 This is great news - I noticed this morning that we have a patch for the tests as well 18:09:12 we all need to jump in help with the reviews 18:09:28 Alok has started CI setup as well. 18:09:39 any questions from the team on the patches 18:09:49 maruti: cool - that will be nice 18:09:58 Is Alok here? 18:09:59 Sukhdev: does the patch program vtep schema? 18:10:00 we are planning CI setup .... initially we'll have ovsdb server 18:10:02 May be Alok can chime in the CI overall overview to armax and Sukdev 18:10:29 alokmaurya: thanks for joining us 18:10:29 Last time I looked at the code it was stubbed out 18:10:34 all vadildation will be done at ovsdb server level 18:10:54 alokmaurya: are you using zuul for the CI setup? 18:11:44 songole: there is tremendous progress on the patches- you may want to review the updated versions 18:12:03 Sukhdev: ok, thanks 18:12:24 armax: Do we need any CI coordination with the neutron side as well? 18:12:32 @sukhdev yesy it will be zuul+jenkins server .... 18:12:55 the coordination required should be limited to getting the CI to validate Neutron changes as well 18:13:08 to avoid the chance of breakage caused by changes to the core framework 18:13:21 alokmaurya: If you need any help, please let us know - we have some experiance with CI - Do not struggle alone 18:13:25 one aspect we nee to get sorted is the integration with the core plugin 18:13:55 l2gw, or any other service built on top of the core like fw, vpn or lb, need to be aware or core events like port creation etc 18:14:19 armax: that is what I meant by the coordination with neutron side - I am hoping CI should test that part as well 18:14:37 the wsgi refactoring and the v3 plugin API work that’s ongoing in Neutron is supposed to give us the hooks necessary to get these services fully decoupled from the core 18:15:11 I am watching the space but nothing major has happened so far…I am thinking of a contingency plan in case things don’t work out as they should 18:15:18 but there’s still a bit of time 18:15:41 armax: understood - we should keep an eye on it 18:15:53 Anything else on the patches? 18:16:16 Any questions - we have authors here 18:16:32 Ok - lets move on 18:16:41 #topic: Functional Testing 18:17:06 I saw a patch for the tests this morning - have not had a chance to review it 18:17:09 Sukhdev - just we need your blessings for review the patchset that is related to l2gateway 18:17:48 selvakumar: I am on it - will get the reviews going shortly 18:18:22 I have another person from Arista who is also reviewing the code/patches 18:18:28 Sukhdev: sure thanks. 18:18:48 Here is the link for the tests - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148188/ 18:19:17 We need volunteers for functional tests and reviews 18:19:50 Any takers? 18:20:13 we will add more functional test moving forward for l2 gateway 18:20:18 Folks who are listening on this channel, this is your opportunity to join us and make contribution to this program 18:20:58 ashishg_: I will review the patch and provide feedback as to what other tests we should include 18:21:13 i am currently writing test based on the tempest framework for api testing 18:21:35 ashishg_: that is a perfect starting point 18:21:46 yes, in Neutron we’re really close to moving the API tests out of neutron 18:21:50 the current patch set is according to the tempest framework for basic rest api testing 18:21:53 sorry I meant Tempest 18:21:56 out of Tempest 18:22:24 Anything else on the tests? 18:22:39 Sukhdev : should be add functionality tests with does validation in ovsdb server and tunnel formation is smae place ? 18:23:25 alokmaurya: you mean end-to-end tests. 18:23:31 yes 18:23:40 Yes, that we the ultimate goal 18:23:50 will 18:24:09 Anything else on test? 18:24:12 * Sukhdev waiting 18:24:31 #topic: Action Item from previous week 18:24:49 I provided the status on the wiki - will get it going soon 18:25:06 Alok can add CI information to the wiki after it is available. 18:25:24 maruti: yes, that will be good 18:25:35 maruti : sure 18:25:54 In fact, you can create a separate wiki for it and we can add a link to the main wiki 18:26:10 sounds good 18:26:54 alokmaurya: Here is an example of wiki for CI that I put together - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Arista-third-party-testing 18:27:05 alokmaurya: perhaps you can use this as a sample 18:27:26 Sukhdev : sure i'll have a look at it .... 18:27:47 #topic: Virtual Gateway Implementation 18:28:20 As armax mentioned present implementation is for HW based devices 18:28:38 We need to extend it to virtual devices 18:28:57 Is there anybody out there who has a use case for the virtual devices? 18:29:12 We will need volunteers for that part 18:29:37 I'm interested in it. 18:29:48 yamahata: great 18:29:52 But no plan at the moment. give me a while 18:30:19 yamahata: Please review the patches and understand the code and then feel free to jump in when you feel it is appropriate 18:30:49 Sukhdev: sure. 18:31:01 #topic: Open Discussion 18:31:22 Any body has anything to discuss related to L2GW? 18:31:32 This is great opportunity to bring it up 18:31:50 * Sukhdev waiting 18:31:57 Sukhdev: Is there a plan to support Logical_Router in hardware vtep? 18:32:16 In the first release target? 18:32:36 songole: not in the first release target 18:32:58 armax: ok, thanks 18:33:08 songole: first release is very limited scope 18:33:29 songole but we can put it on the radar and talk about it for sure 18:33:59 ok. Is there a doc on how is it supposed to ok 18:34:05 songole: just to understand, you mean to have logical router running on HW device, right? 18:34:14 Sukhdev: yes 18:34:53 songole: We support that in Arista HW - you could today have neutron routers running on Arista HW 18:35:17 I implemented the L3 Router Service plugin on Arista HW 18:35:49 Is there a plugin I could use for reference? 18:35:54 It uses Neutron Router API - the actual router functionality is implemented in the Hardware 18:36:07 songole: yes 18:36:22 * Sukhdev looking 18:36:40 Sukhdev: thanks 18:36:57 https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/services/l3_router/l3_arista.py 18:37:13 Sukhdev: thanks 18:37:32 BTW, there are other implentations as well - Brocade and APIC 18:38:07 Anything else? 18:38:14 Does it use vtep schema or Arista EOS calls? 18:38:44 No - not presently - we use SVIs 18:39:24 Once we have L2GW functionality implemented - we may consolidate 18:39:50 Sukhdev: got it. 18:39:58 Well, folks, thanks for joining us today 18:40:16 If you have any feedback, please send us a ping 18:40:27 #endmeeting