17:02:10 <Sukhdev> #startmeeting networking_l2gw 17:02:10 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jan 4 17:02:10 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:02:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:02:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_l2gw' 17:02:43 <Sukhdev> #topic: Agenda 17:02:48 <Sukhdev> #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway#Meeting_January_4.2C_2016 17:02:58 <Sukhdev> Hi oferby 17:03:03 <oferby> hi 17:03:28 <Sukhdev> I guess it is you and me today 17:03:41 <oferby> as it was last time .... 17:03:47 <Sukhdev> #topic: Announcements 17:03:55 <Sukhdev> Happy new yeat 17:04:00 <Sukhdev> year 17:04:00 <ChuckC> o/ 17:04:06 <oferby> HNY to you too 17:05:02 <Sukhdev> #topic: Patches under review 17:05:21 <Sukhdev> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/networking-l2gw,n,z 17:05:33 <Sukhdev> I was gone for two and half weeks 17:05:53 <Sukhdev> I approved some of the patches last night and noticed that jenkins was not happy 17:06:19 <oferby> about what? did not see.. 17:06:43 <Sukhdev> oferby : check out that link that I posted 17:07:29 <Sukhdev> oferby : I gave +2 to several patches and none of them merged 17:07:55 <oferby> i see now thew mcast remote 17:09:56 <Sukhdev> oferby : ? 17:11:25 <oferby> didn't get you question .... I see the patch that have a problem in jenkins . 17:12:45 <oferby> is anyone working on it? I was working off-line on the inter-cloud connection. 17:12:54 <Sukhdev> sorry - was looking through the logs to see if I can spot something 17:13:55 <Sukhdev> oferby : I was gone on PTO for 2.5 weeks and it seems no body has been looking at these 17:14:21 <Sukhdev> Looks like this will prevent for merging anything 17:14:47 <Sukhdev> I will try to look into this later this week 17:15:05 <Sukhdev> oferby : if you happen to have few cycles, please have a look as well 17:15:14 <oferby> I have some tasks that I have to finish and I can than help. 17:15:24 <Sukhdev> I will ping the india team as well 17:15:31 <oferby> ok 17:15:34 <Sukhdev> oferby : sounds good 17:15:54 <Sukhdev> oferby : how is your inter-cloud project coming along? 17:16:25 <oferby> as you guys were off-line, I started to work in my own branch 17:16:52 <oferby> all working well. I plan to merge as soon as I will finish it 17:17:05 <oferby> meanwhile, I worked with the OVS team 17:17:34 <oferby> to add the passive mode. I send out the patch and it is being reviewed 17:17:48 <oferby> the schema extension too. 17:18:31 <Sukhdev> I saw that patch two weeks ago - any progress on it? 17:18:44 <Sukhdev> does it look like it will merge soon? 17:19:25 <oferby> sure, but I have to finish it in 2 weeks. internal milestone.... I will merge it as soon as I pass the milestone. ok? 17:20:05 <Sukhdev> makes sense 17:20:21 <oferby> I also met with people from Midokura 17:20:28 <Sukhdev> In the mean time, I will work on identifying the issue with the gate 17:20:31 <oferby> they are also interested in this 17:20:37 <Sukhdev> how did that meeting go? 17:20:56 <oferby> very well. had 2 meeting with them. 17:21:24 <Sukhdev> good 17:21:27 <oferby> they are interested with the new API (inter-cloud extension) as they have their own implementation. 17:21:59 <Sukhdev> when will you post your patch for review? 17:22:14 <oferby> irena from Midokura added a bug on this and I will write with her blue print, ok? 17:22:43 <Sukhdev> do you have a link to the bug? 17:22:48 <oferby> sec 17:24:50 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : hi 17:25:03 <oferby> https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-l2gw/+bug/1529863 17:25:04 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1529863 in networking-l2gw "[RFE] extend l2gw api to support multi-site connectivity" [Undecided,New] 17:25:07 <ChuckC> Sukhdev:happy new year 17:25:24 <Sukhdev> #link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-l2gw/+bug/1529863 17:25:36 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : Thanks - same to you 17:25:55 <Sukhdev> saw you were lurking here - wondered if you were interested in L2 GW as well 17:26:22 <ChuckC> We are planning to use it, so I'm trying to see where things are. 17:26:33 <Sukhdev> oferby : thanks for the link 17:26:47 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : what is your use case? 17:28:29 <Sukhdev> oferby : If I remember correctly from our discussion during Tokyo summit, Midokura wants to use it for L3, right? 17:28:40 <oferby> yes 17:28:57 <Sukhdev> so, they will build it upon your work - 17:28:59 <ChuckC> I think the basic use case already in place is a good start. We're integrating with Helion. 17:29:19 <oferby> they have their own implementaion 17:29:50 <oferby> they use the API 17:30:05 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : It already is integrated with Helion, right? the HP team made it work 17:30:21 <Sukhdev> oferby : correct - 17:30:38 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : are you part of HP team> 17:31:07 <ChuckC> Sukhdev: yes, one of them. The other team is HP networking. Probably others.... 17:31:09 <Sukhdev> oferby : are you planning on pushing your patch(es)? 17:32:02 <oferby> I will finish all in 2 weeks. would you like me to push it when it is in progress or at the end? 17:32:33 <ChuckC> HP has enough openstack offerings that I'm a bit confused what's been done where ;) 17:32:39 <Sukhdev> oferby : Yes, please 17:33:05 <oferby> :-) yes push or yes wait .... 17:33:34 <Sukhdev> oferby : sorry - I meant yes, push it when you are ready 17:33:59 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : that is the blessing and curse for working for large company :-):-) 17:34:16 <ChuckC> indeed 17:34:21 <Sukhdev> I used to work for Cisco many years ago - and I felt like that some times :-) 17:35:14 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : most of the HP india team was working on L2 GW project - with armax leading from Palo Alto team 17:36:08 <ChuckC> Yes, I believe that was HP networking. I'm kind of surprised that only you and oferby seem to be attending these meetings. 17:36:35 <Sukhdev> oferby : so, I will look into the gate issues - hopefully, it will be cleaned up before you are ready to push your patches 17:36:48 <oferby> greate. 17:37:06 <Sukhdev> oferby : feel free to jump in, if you have any cycles - 17:37:18 <oferby> I will. 17:37:25 <Sukhdev> Anything else we need to cover here? 17:37:34 <oferby> not from here. 17:37:46 <ChuckC> where do you track your work for mitaka? 17:38:06 <ChuckC> you don't do launchpad, right? 17:38:26 <Sukhdev> ChuckC: we have launchpad 17:38:41 <ChuckC> blueprints? or just bug list? 17:38:52 <Sukhdev> however, there is no specific charter for mitaka - other than what oferby is working on 17:39:10 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : we track everything via bugs 17:39:24 <ChuckC> ok, that's what it looked like 17:39:34 <ChuckC> thanks 17:39:42 <Sukhdev> ChuckC: it keeps things simple :-) 17:39:53 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : anything you would like to discuss? 17:39:58 <ChuckC> sure 17:40:27 <ChuckC> not in particular. I need to get devstack working, but haven't been able to give it too much time yet 17:41:10 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : give it a shot....actually, I intend to run it as well later this week or early next week 17:41:22 <Sukhdev> ChuckC : feel free to ping me if you see any issue 17:41:35 <ChuckC> Sukhdev: thanks, will do 17:41:42 <Sukhdev> I guess we are done for today. 17:41:50 <Sukhdev> will see you guys in two weeks 17:42:04 <Sukhdev> Thanks for attending 17:42:12 <ChuckC> adios 17:42:14 <Sukhdev> bye 17:42:18 <oferby> yep. bye. 17:42:21 <Sukhdev> #endmeeting