17:01:16 #startmeeting networking_l2gw 17:01:17 Meeting started Mon Mar 28 17:01:16 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:21 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_l2gw' 17:01:35 #topic: Agenda 17:01:44 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway#Meeting_March_28.2C_2016 17:02:04 #topic: Announcements 17:02:25 Mitaka release is almost out 17:02:40 Newton is open for business, I believe 17:02:54 oferby: you here? 17:02:58 yes 17:03:16 so, lets target all of your work for Newton 17:03:45 right. I will change the name of the folder to Newton. 17:04:47 Also, I suggested a design session in neutron track for Austin summit and added your and my name to it 17:05:15 oferby : have you seen the list of ideas for neutron design summit? 17:05:30 no, did not. 17:05:47 can you send link? 17:05:50 see here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-neutron-summit-ideas 17:05:54 thanks. 17:06:04 Look for the second item on the list 17:06:25 I see it. 17:06:30 great. 17:07:05 If the session gets approved, I thought it will be a good idea to socialize the design idea with wider neutron community 17:07:25 Feel free to add more context to the etherpad 17:07:31 Should we try to get Ben Pfaff (OVS) also to talk about the IDL? 17:08:07 If we are able to get the session - then, it will help 17:08:16 ok 17:08:37 when this will be evaluated for approval? 17:08:49 can you add any links to the etherpad item so that when armax makes the session decisions, he has more context 17:09:07 We should know in next couple of weeks 17:09:40 I met with armax over beer, we discussed many other design ideas - I forgot to bring this one :-( 17:09:51 but, will follow up with him on this 17:10:11 perhaps, this can be merged with another session 17:10:41 ok. we have to try to talk to Ben in order to move fardward with IDL. 17:11:08 it seems that I can't do it by myself for some reason ... :-( 17:11:21 oferby : I saw your email and replied to it a little while ago 17:12:13 looking 17:12:17 I will discuss this with the experts as to how the rest of the world uses this. Based upon that will make the case 17:12:43 armax : are you here? 17:14:25 ok. We can go with any of the approaches. We just need to decide which one is best for us. 17:15:11 Let me seek some opinions from the experts as to how most of the venders do and will share via email 17:15:17 then we can go from there - 17:15:42 sure 17:15:45 if you can forward me Ben's email - I will include him into the email as well - when I respond back 17:15:54 I will. 17:16:05 sounds good 17:16:34 anything else on this? 17:16:53 no. Can we talk about the new API? 17:17:08 sure 17:17:19 I looked at your spec and gave +2 17:17:41 do you think that we can conclude the work on the new API so we can start to implement? 17:18:10 yes - I do not see any reason 17:18:19 that is why I gave +2 17:18:31 this is a heads up for others to jump in as well 17:18:57 I spoke with Midokura today - 17:19:10 they want to help 17:19:22 I wish they could join us here in this meeting :-) 17:19:32 that is good 17:19:44 Irena said that it is kids time .... 17:19:55 it is 20:00 where he are 17:20:15 oh I see 17:20:53 anyway, we agreed that they will look at the code I've put in gerrit and we will talk on how they want to join in. 17:21:05 sounds good 17:21:35 there are other patches as well - you may want to review them as well 17:21:49 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/networking-l2gw,n,z 17:22:08 I actually tested one. it did not work .... send a remark on it 17:22:27 yes, I saw it - thanks 17:22:52 I will try to check the others too. 17:23:04 I use to test most of the patches before approving - I am falling behind on that a bit 17:23:07 :-) 17:23:17 :-) 17:23:55 oferby : did your session for Austin summit get approved? 17:24:04 for the main conf session? 17:24:38 no, it did not :-( did not have a chance to send you a link to get your support ... 17:25:08 We should have socialized it in the neutron world - 17:25:38 yes, you should have send it to me - I would have advertised in all the meetings that I attend and chair 17:25:56 ye, my bad. 17:26:08 lets try to shoot for the design session - 17:27:23 what actions should I take ? 17:28:33 Oh nothing much - I added the subject to the list - you can add some links or add a sentence to explain a bit more so that folks know what this is 17:28:45 This way we can generate interest and get support 17:29:18 armax will know what it is, but, others may not know - hence, a little explanation will help to get support for approval 17:29:34 there is 'hah?' there - not yours?! 17:29:50 no - 17:30:09 it means somebody wants more explanation - they did not know what it was :-) 17:30:31 :-) ok, so I will add some text and links 17:31:26 Anything else we need to discuss? 17:31:37 thats it. 17:32:23 you had a document or slide deck - you may want to add the link to that - that will help folks people understand it 17:32:44 ok. I will. 17:33:39 sounds good 17:33:50 so, if we do not have anything lets call it a day 17:33:57 right. 17:34:04 and go have your beer :-) 17:34:12 and I will have my coffee :-) 17:34:23 :-) on my way there 17:34:32 cool - enjoy 17:34:36 thanks for attending 17:34:40 sure 17:34:41 bye 17:34:47 bye 17:34:47 #endmeeting