16:01:44 #startmeeting networking_ml2 16:01:45 Meeting started Wed Jan 20 16:01:44 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:48 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_ml2' 16:01:53 hello 16:01:56 hi 16:02:03 #topic: Agenda 16:02:09 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2#Meeting_January_20.2C_2016 16:02:30 I kept the same agenda as last week - to wrap up things hopefully 16:02:41 Anybody wants to add anything to agenda? 16:02:56 #topic: Announcements 16:03:18 I do not have any announcement - do you have any? 16:03:30 Does anybody know the name for N release? 16:03:37 hi, sorry for being late 16:03:51 scheuran : we are just starting 16:04:33 So, does anybody know? 16:04:54 I think Newton was voted as the name for the n release 16:05:01 Newton :) 16:05:13 ah cool - thanks 16:05:40 Lets get started 16:05:58 #topic: Driver API for SG 16:06:22 rkukura : thanks for updating the bug 16:06:30 np 16:06:41 and getting it closed off for Mitaka 16:07:06 We need to put together a proposal or Newton release 16:07:23 perhaps discuss at the Austin summit as well 16:07:46 #link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1518087 16:07:48 Launchpad bug 1518087 in neutron "[RFE] Method to guarantee that at least one mechanism driver implements security groups" [Wishlist,Won't fix] - Assigned to yalei wang (yalei-wang) 16:08:17 should we do something to close the bug? 16:08:27 I mean mark the status? 16:08:40 why not leave it open, but target the next release? 16:09:03 yalie : good point - is there a way to mark the bug for a release? 16:09:33 I can see the 'milestone', but don't know how to edit 16:10:03 yalie : neutron cores can do it - 16:10:06 looks like status is already “won’t fix”. This would need to get changed, then I think the milestone could be set. 16:10:36 I usually ask mestry to change it 16:11:15 we need armax to renew it? 16:11:41 not a huge deal - I’m hoping we address the more general case for neutron, which might best have a new bug/BP 16:12:00 once we have a concrete proposal, then we can re-open it or file a fresh RFE for N release 16:12:00 yes 16:12:08 agree 16:12:31 anything else on this? 16:13:39 #topic: Limited portsec 16:14:23 we had a good discussion on this in last meeting 16:14:23 I updated the patch last week, added the devref, hope that would help to clarify. 16:15:01 yalie : thanks for the update - I will take look 16:15:10 Sukhdev: thanks! 16:15:15 I will too 16:15:35 rkukura: welcome your comments 16:15:39 yalie : link to devref? 16:16:40 it's within the patch link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250036/18/doc/source/devref/limited_portsec.rst 16:17:04 really hope this patch could be landed in M cycle 16:17:48 and welcome everyone's comment 16:18:41 Lets all review it and post comments 16:18:48 Sukhdev: thanks 16:19:46 yalie : I will ping kevinbenton and akihiro to review this one as well 16:20:17 Sukhdev: the above review? 16:20:29 amotoki : yes, please 16:20:43 amotoki : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250036/ 16:20:50 Sukhdev: sure, thanks 16:21:23 anything else on this? 16:22:16 Sukhdev: thanks! 16:22:33 #topic: Open Discussion 16:23:05 Instead of pinning specific topics, I kept the agenda open today 16:23:34 Anybody wants to discuss any ML2 specific topic today? 16:23:34 jumping in with a quick update on the modular agent 16:23:45 scheuran : please do 16:24:15 i worked closely together with ihar and he will approve the split of lb agent and common part after I corrected some minor nits... 16:24:26 so these are really good news 16:25:03 after that the common part needs to be moved into a new file... 16:25:36 nothing else so far 16:25:54 will moving to a new file be a separate patch? 16:26:01 yes 16:26:17 as otherwise it's hard to review... 16:26:35 you do not see exactly which lines have changed... so I split it up 16:26:36 sorry - says that in the commit message 16:27:12 so if anybody else has some input, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246318 16:28:13 scheuran : thanks for the update - this looks real good 16:28:55 anything else? 16:29:03 not from my side 16:29:15 Looks like we have a short meeting today 16:30:55 OK, if noting else, then we are done 16:31:00 thanks Sukhdev! 16:31:07 thanks everybody 16:31:15 enjoy your day! 16:31:22 #endmeeting