16:01:50 #startmeeting networking_ml2 16:01:51 Meeting started Wed Feb 24 16:01:50 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rkukura. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:54 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_ml2' 16:02:10 #topic Agenda 16:02:38 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2#Meeting_February_24.2C_2016 16:03:08 #topic Announcements 16:04:00 only think I have is that the neutron mid-cycle is going on this week 16:04:18 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-mitaka-midcycle 16:04:19 hello 16:05:20 iyamahat: Hi - Do you have something for the agenda, or an announcement? 16:05:35 nothing from me 16:05:37 Any other announcements? 16:05:59 #topic Open Agenda 16:06:30 Sukhdev added this to last week’s agenda to encourage people to bring up anything they’d like to discuss 16:07:21 in terms of announcement - 16:07:31 Sukhdev: go ahead… 16:07:46 I do not know if you are aware of the stadium inclusion discussion that is going on - 16:08:16 I had seen at least some of that - has there been any conclusion? 16:08:34 i.e. which projects are in the neutron stadium and which are not 16:08:46 no conclusion yet - but, getting there 16:09:07 check it out here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281628/ 16:09:25 Is there concensus that vendor-specific git repos would not be in the stadium? 16:11:48 they will be all out 16:12:10 the contention is about the non-vendor repositories - 16:12:28 such as ODL, OVN, L2GW, SFC, etc 16:13:48 what remains - potentially just advanced services? 16:14:27 yup 16:14:52 if you look at the latest version of the patch - it has a list - which is very small 16:15:49 * tbachman stumbles into the room late 16:15:56 tbachman: hi 16:16:00 rkukura: hi! 16:17:01 Sukhdev: thanks for bringing the stadium re-org up! 16:17:14 np 16:17:54 I do see some advantage in “affiliated” projects being able to make more of their own decisions regarding stable branches, etc. 16:18:52 any other topics for “open agenda”? 16:19:36 anyone starting to think about ML2-related design summit sessions yet? 16:20:48 I’d like to get some brainstorming on that going over the next few weeks in these meetings 16:21:31 #topic Modular L2 agent update 16:21:44 Is scheuran here? 16:21:55 rkukura, hi sorry 16:21:59 np 16:22:09 do you have any update since last week? 16:22:49 talked to moshele today and we agreed to move the sriov agent over to the common agent framework if possible in Newton 16:23:09 I mean we're evaluating it if it's possible 16:23:21 other than that - my macvtap ml2 driver has merged 16:23:35 agent already had 2*2+, but needed a rebase :( 16:23:36 scheuran: great! 16:23:48 so hopefully tomorrow... 16:24:13 regarding docs 16:24:21 I started a ml2 section in the networking guide 16:24:23 https://review.openstack.org/282349 16:24:34 it was already there but without content 16:24:50 rkukura, Sukhdev, if you as ml2 experts could have a look that would be really great! 16:25:10 of course everybody else can do as well :) 16:25:17 #link https://review.openstack.org/282349 16:25:34 scheuran : I will review it - thanks for the link 16:25:45 scheuran: yes - thanks for the heads up - looks very useful 16:26:12 Sukhdev, rkukura, cool, thanks! 16:26:25 Anything else on modular L2 agent? 16:26:33 no 16:26:39 thanks scheuran 16:26:46 welcome! 16:27:08 #topic Routed Networks 16:27:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225384/ 16:28:34 I still haven’t had a chance to review recent updates of this in detail, but it does seem to be progressing 16:28:50 Anyone have any comments on it to bring up here? 16:30:31 I notice a comment about making segments a 1st class API, which hopefully will also be useful for traditional multi-segment L2 networks as well 16:32:10 This really looks like it will have significant impact on ML2 - I encourage everyone who cares to review/comment 16:32:35 anything else on this? 16:32:54 if not… 16:33:01 #topic Open Discussion 16:33:45 not sure about the difference between “open agenda” and “open discussion”, but please feel free to bring up anything you’d like to discuss 16:33:58 otherwise, we’ll wrap up for today 16:34:50 seems that’s it for today… 16:35:04 thanks everyone! 16:35:09 #endmeeting