16:03:17 #startmeeting networking_ml2 16:03:17 Meeting started Wed Sep 7 16:03:17 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:03:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:03:20 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_ml2' 16:03:44 #topic: Agenda 16:03:51 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2#Meeting_September_7.2C_2016 16:04:06 Agenda is light today - hopefully, we will be done quick 16:04:16 #topic: Announcements 16:04:40 I do not have any - was gone to the VMWorld and FutureNet all week - 16:04:54 did not have time to catch up with other things 16:05:04 anybody has any announcement to make? 16:05:17 The release deadline is approaching soon 16:05:49 #topic: RFEs/Bugs 16:06:03 I cleaned up the list of bugs/patches - 16:06:24 I noticed some of them have already been fixed/merged - so, cleaned up the list a bit 16:06:39 Sukhdev: thanks! 16:07:00 Port Binding for live migration - 16:07:07 andreas_s : welcome back 16:07:14 Sukhdev, thank you :) 16:07:31 I saw armax's comment on the patch - overall, it looks good 16:07:45 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309416/ 16:08:05 I think what this spec needs is some insights of you guys, if the split between creation and activation of a binding works out 16:08:30 My feeling is, it's doable 16:08:45 But there might be many things that I did not consider... 16:09:04 At least the topic got some attention on the nova and also on the neutron midcycle 16:09:45 andreas_s : right - I noticed that 16:10:31 and unifying the port binging logic might not be a requirement anymore... 16:11:25 rkukura : your thoughts... 16:11:39 I need to re-review this one 16:12:10 hoped to do that before this meeting, but didn’t get to it 16:12:47 I think we do not need to spent much time on that today. It would be great if you could comment there some time later the week 16:13:18 this is going to be in O-release so, we have some time 16:13:29 the goal is to have a proposal for the summit that can be discussed 16:13:41 ok 16:13:54 andreas_s : that is a good goal 16:14:54 I think we can move on, if there's nothing else.. 16:15:05 sounds good - thanks andreas_s 16:15:40 Drive API/Features request 16:16:03 I cleaned this up a bit and we are down to 2 now 16:16:30 Does anybody want to go into the details of any of these? 16:17:26 I will take silence as NO 16:17:37 * Sukhdev waiting 16:18:06 #topic: Open Discussion 16:18:28 Any body wants to discuss anything related to ML2? 16:18:30 I reviewed the second one recently - looks ok IMO 16:18:43 andreas_s : me too 16:19:44 I looked at it last night as well and I think this seems reasonable 16:20:47 Anything else? 16:20:51 Is this the status setter? 16:21:01 rkukura, yes 16:21:35 oh maybe one question 16:21:42 that came up while reviewing this patch 16:21:51 My concern on the bug report was that status from different MDs might need to be merged, but I don’t think that’s an issue for port, which is what this patch addresses. 16:21:52 seems like different port status exists 16:22:42 https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/constants.py 16:23:20 hhmm maybe they did some cleanup in the meantime 16:23:40 there were was a SERVICE_PORT_STATUS and a PORT_STATUS or so... 16:24:31 oh wait 16:24:40 https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/constants.py#L23 16:24:47 https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/constants.py#L34 16:24:53 what's the difference between those 2? 16:26:43 without looking too deep into this - first one is the actual port status - the second one is generic ACTIVE label which can used in any way for any resource 16:27:17 ah ok got it 16:27:19 thanks 16:28:13 Anything else? 16:28:46 going once...... 16:29:03 thanks Sukhdev! 16:29:26 thanks everybody - 16:29:31 #endmeeting