18:01:30 #startmeeting networking_policy 18:01:30 Meeting started Thu Oct 30 18:01:30 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:01:34 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy' 18:02:09 SumitNaiksatam: hi 18:02:18 hello 18:02:29 any breaking news anyone would like to share? ;-) 18:03:04 * SumitNaiksatam feeling happy about the giants victory! 18:03:31 bumgarner for prez 18:03:43 LouisF: lol! 18:03:54 ok moving to the agenda then 18:04:02 #topics Specs in review 18:04:30 over the past couple of days we merged the pending spec related to network service policy (NSP) 18:04:35 SumitNaiksatam: hi 18:04:41 and the vendor driver specs 18:05:26 fyi - #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/group-based-policy-specs/log/ 18:05:41 * glebo dodgers fan, but still feeling happy for rest of NorCal about Giants big win. Soooo fun to watch that last night. 18:06:02 (bum's the one!) 18:07:11 we will review and merge the other specs either during the next week or when we come back from Paris 18:07:33 also these will serve as topics for the design summit session discussion 18:08:27 these are the currently pending spec reviews #link #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/group-based-policy-specs+branch:master,n,z 18:09:12 #topic Patches in review 18:09:23 hi 18:10:00 we had a focussed review meeting on Tuesday to zone in on the service redirect/chain related patches 18:10:51 if you missed this IRC meeting, the logs are here: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Gbp-sc-patch-reviews-10282014.pdf 18:11:24 based on the discussion and presumably better understanding of these patches, we have reviewed and started merging some of them 18:11:51 #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/group-based-policy/ 18:12:12 some of the service chain model and redirect patches have been merged 18:12:55 a few of them are still in review and close to merging 18:12:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/group-based-policy+branch:master,n,z 18:13:31 the remaining patches also includes the patch on Network Service Policy resource that we added to the GBP model 18:13:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129545/ 18:13:58 ivar-lazzaro: i responded to your comment on the above patch yesterday 18:14:05 ivar-lazzaro: are you still -1 on this? 18:14:18 *looking* 18:15:01 SumitNaiksatam: ok I totally misunderstood the intention of that value parameter 18:15:07 SumitNaiksatam: removing -1 18:15:13 ivar-lazzaro: okay, np 18:15:39 is magesh here? 18:16:42 hemanthravi: how are we doing on: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130920/ 18:18:02 SumitNaiksatam, working on resolving the patch conflicts and address the comments 18:18:11 hemanthravi: okay great 18:18:19 hemanthravi: any ETA? ;-P 18:18:54 SumitNaiksatam, magesh addressed most of the comments, expecting to be done in 1-2 hrs 18:19:48 hemanthravi: sweet 18:20:01 okay that leaves us with the vendor patches 18:20:09 both sets of patches are failing UTs 18:20:27 ivar-lazzaro: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130418 18:20:58 SumitNaiksatam, will fix the UTs for NVSD once the rebase is done 18:21:09 hemanthravi: ok thanks 18:21:31 SumitNaiksatam: investigating on this 18:21:38 ivar-lazzaro: okay 18:21:46 #topic Paris summit next week 18:22:08 we are collecting topics for the design session here: 18:22:13 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-gbp-design-summit-topics 18:22:20 please add your input 18:22:52 a lot of it will be driven by what we reviewed in the patches in the past couple of weeks 18:23:12 i think that has generated a lot of open items (mostly being documented as bugs now) 18:23:53 btw the design summit session is here: #link http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/98dc4255384e340682137c8a7ee7e60d#.VFKCJYt4r4w 18:24:00 please add to your schedule 18:24:40 i know glebo can’t make it, hope everyone else is busy packing their bags and getting ready to go! ;-) 18:25:19 SumitNaiksatam: i will not be there but Cathy and Nicolas Bouthors will be 18:25:20 also the GBP conference session is on monday, #link https://openstacksummitnovember2014paris.sched.org/event/3381db355f042c612c11960a588e31de#.VEfLxYt4r4w 18:25:31 LouisF: oh bummer! 18:25:54 LouisF: yeah, cathy mentioned she was going 18:26:11 * glebo sorry. Immovable personal event. Will b there next time. 18:26:13 LouisF: can you channelize your input on the etherpad? 18:26:21 SumitNaiksatam: yes 18:26:23 glebo: yeah, i understand! 18:27:06 anything else we need to discuss in the context of the next week? 18:27:34 #topic Open Discussion 18:27:55 rkukura: anything you wanted to share on the packaging front? 18:28:04 making some progress 18:28:09 rkukura: sweet! 18:28:28 Don’t see any obstacles - just need time to work on it. 18:28:31 rkukura: perhaps we can have a separate agenda item on this in the future 18:28:40 I will be in attendance remotely, and Yi Sun and Gary Duan from our team will be in attendance physically (mentally, no promises ;-) 18:28:40 rkukura: ok good to know 18:28:43 I’ve had to focus on ML2 and other neutron stuff lately. 18:28:48 glebo: sure 18:28:52 rkukura: ok 18:29:31 rkukura: i have a few doubts about the client packaging since the client does not have a stable/juno branch 18:29:43 SumitNaiksatam: agenda item makes sense, particularly if we start packaging for multiple distros and various people are involved. 18:29:52 rkukura: currently what we have tested is an in between version 18:29:59 rkukura: true 18:30:04 SumitNaiksatam: Agreed lack of stable client complicates things a bit 18:30:31 rkukura: anyway, we can take that offline and/or discuss f2f 18:30:34 We may need branches to track the versions that vendors use 18:30:43 sure 18:30:43 rkukura: that would be great 18:31:05 rkukura: accept i havent figured out how to administer branches in a stackforge project 18:31:14 rkukura: you have any leads on this? 18:31:31 No, haven’t looked 18:31:44 we also need to add a “jnuo-gbp-x” label 18:31:55 times shown on agenda are paris local time, correct? 18:31:57 *juno 18:32:11 glebo: they are paris local times 18:32:18 right, and it would be nice for our labled versions to get “official” tarballs that the packages would use. 18:32:46 SumitNaiksatam: thx 18:32:51 rkukura: exactly 18:33:15 oh btw, in the review section we missed that we have client and heat patches in review as well 18:33:48 SumitNaiksatam: question regarding the packaging 18:34:06 client patches #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/python-group-based-policy-client+branch:master,n,z 18:34:10 rkukura: go ahead 18:34:40 heat pacthes: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/group-based-policy-automation+branch:master,n,z 18:34:48 I’ll need to know which sets of in-review patches to include in each project so that everything has a chance to work together properly. 18:34:56 horizon patches: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/group-based-policy-ui+branch:master,n,z 18:35:05 rkukura: absolutely 18:35:22 rkukura: i would tend to think we would have everything merged what we need to package 18:35:35 rkukura: latest by when do you need to know this? 18:36:11 Not really sure when I’ll get to the other projects, but would be helpful to know which server-side patches to include. 18:36:47 Would be helpful to know that now or tomorrow. 18:37:10 rkukura: i think i will be able to let you know by EOD 18:37:17 rkukura: latest by tomorrow morning 18:37:17 OK, thanks 18:37:29 rkukura: our original deadline was today morning 18:37:51 rkukura: but all schedules are meant to slip :-( 18:37:57 we’re a bit behind, but I’d like to have something at least ready to test before the summit 18:38:15 rkukura: yes, i will let you know at the earliest 18:38:29 ok - It won’t block my work yet 18:38:45 rkukura: ok good to know 18:39:13 Is the stuff already merged sufficient for first cut? 18:39:20 rkukura: not yet 18:39:20 On the server? 18:39:24 no 18:39:44 rkukura: the service chain model in kind of in a transient state 18:39:54 in -> is 18:40:00 rkukura SumitNaiksatam: I would say let's try to pull in the vendor drivers as well 18:40:19 ivar-lazzaro: yes we will, as long as they are ready by EOD :-) 18:40:27 ivar-lazzaro: we acually by evening today 18:40:31 we -> well 18:40:55 rkukura: i wanted to avoid this last minute rush for you 18:41:12 rkukura: hence we were trying to speed this up, unfortunately we are where we are 18:41:27 everybody has worked pretty hard on this! 18:41:39 I just want to get server package building and working, then can update it. 18:41:52 rkukura: sure, in that case you can give it a shot 18:42:02 okay, anything else we want to discuss today? 18:42:52 alrighty, thanks folks for joining 18:43:10 by next week you should be able to pull a devstack and see all of this running 18:43:21 (in fact its mostly functional today as well) 18:43:31 see you all in Paris (or at least most of you) 18:43:38 bye till then! 18:43:42 #endmeeeting 18:43:45 Our “yum install openstack-gbp-neutron” or something like that! 18:43:49 Au revoir 18:43:53 adios 18:44:09 rkukura: sure 18:44:13 #endmeeting