18:02:12 #startmeeting networking_policy 18:02:13 Meeting started Thu Jan 21 18:02:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:02:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:02:16 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy' 18:02:21 hi 18:02:39 #info agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#Jan_21st.2C_2016 18:02:59 mostly an on-demand agenda today 18:03:42 there are no critical outstanding bugs (some things got fixed over the course of last couple of weeks) 18:03:45 hemanthravi: hi 18:03:49 SumitNaiksatam, hi 18:04:55 regarding functional tests - there were a new set ot tests posted by jishnu for gbpfunc and have merged in the master 18:04:59 need to be backported 18:05:16 other than that i dont have update on the functional/integration tests 18:05:54 fyi the tests which were merged were #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268389/ 18:06:18 rkukura: anything to update on the packaging side of things? 18:06:32 nothing new 18:06:36 rkukura: okay 18:06:46 #topic liberty stable branch 18:07:25 at this point i would like to propose creating the stable liberty branch 18:07:49 we have let it sit for a few days after the liberty sync acitivity 18:08:03 does anyone need to post any new patches right away? 18:08:35 if not, i can go ahead with creating the branch today 18:08:55 sounds good 18:09:09 rkukura: i think you need an updated release for the other stable branches as well, right? 18:09:15 for proceeding with the packaging 18:09:15 yes 18:09:23 rkukura: okay 18:10:04 after we create the liberty branch we will immediately focus on aligning master with mitakak 18:10:09 *mitaka 18:10:37 meanwhile, we can continue to backport bug fixes wherever necessary 18:11:19 #topic Design Specs 18:11:29 we have the following outstanding specs: 18:11:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/242781 (introduce PT cluster_id for HA policy targets) 18:12:12 ivar-laz_: this one is consistent with the current design, right? 18:12:49 yeah nothing changed lately on that 18:12:58 ivar-laz_: ok good 18:13:19 rkukura: hemanthravi: lets review and plan on getting it merged soon 18:13:30 ok 18:13:32 ok 18:13:36 the other spec #link https://review.openstack.org/239743 (Network Service Framework for GBP) 18:13:40 rkukura: hemanthravi thanks 18:14:01 hemanthravi: that probably needs another iteration? 18:14:07 i'll be updating this spec based on the discussions 18:14:16 and post a new one 18:14:35 hemanthravi: thanks 18:15:09 hemanthravi: is there anything specific that you would like to bring up for discussion here? 18:15:48 perhaps provide a summary of the discussions that you referred to? 18:16:34 i'm looking at splitting into 2 specs, 1 for an API and one for a NS rendering framework based on current APIs 18:16:46 hemanthravi: that sounds good 18:17:09 hemanthravi: when you say API, this implies both northbound and southbound API? 18:17:14 rendering framework will listen to RPC events and provide a life cycle mgmt and configuration framework 18:17:37 SumitNaiksatam, yes 18:17:51 hemanthravi: okay 18:18:04 doing it this way as the northbound API might take a little longer to converge 18:18:20 sure 18:19:05 other than those two, i anticipate that we will be spending time in the next few weeks discussing new features and design 18:19:32 in the past few months we were focussed on bug fixing and stabilizing with fewer new features 18:19:46 so if you have been planning to introduce new specs, this is a good time 18:20:13 igordcard_: anything you wanted to discuss regarding the QoS support? 18:21:20 perhaps he is away 18:21:29 #topic Open Discussion 18:22:24 we are still behind on the API and devref documentation 18:22:45 hopefully get a move on that soon 18:22:56 anything else anyone want to bring up? 18:24:02 alrighty, thanks everyone for your time 18:24:10 c ya next week 18:24:13 bye! 18:24:19 bye 18:24:29 bye! 18:24:30 #endmeeting