18:03:37 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:03:38 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb  4 18:03:37 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:03:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:03:42 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:04:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#Feb_4th.2C_2016
18:05:10 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Bugs
18:05:29 <SumitNaiksatam> the critical bug from UI is still being worked on
18:05:56 <SumitNaiksatam> we need to test the latest patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273496/
18:06:12 <SumitNaiksatam> i had tested the earlier patchset
18:06:26 <SumitNaiksatam> i am not aware of any other critical bugs right now
18:06:31 <rkukura> I gave that one my +2, but didn’t test it myself.
18:07:01 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks
18:07:16 <rkukura> It looks fine, but is there any question as to whether it really solves the bug?
18:07:34 <rkukura> I could spin up a devstack and test it if needed.
18:07:38 <SumitNaiksatam> the issue here is that we are seeing slighlty different behavior in devstack versus the RHEL install
18:08:00 <SumitNaiksatam> the earlier hard coded URLs were causing a problem in the RHEL install (on kilo)
18:08:45 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: that will be helpful to have some one else validate this as well
18:09:26 <SumitNaiksatam> for devstack, i am not sure if an extra step needs to be run:
18:09:59 <SumitNaiksatam> python manage.py collectstatic --noinput
18:10:06 <SumitNaiksatam> from the gbpui directory
18:10:30 <SumitNaiksatam> if required we can add this as a part of the devstack gbp lib
18:10:46 <rkukura> would that not have been necessary prior to this fix?
18:11:11 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: so it was not necessary for juno and kilo
18:11:16 <SumitNaiksatam> in devstack
18:11:30 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: in liberty the way the static files were loaded was changed
18:11:46 <rkukura> OK, so this isn’t due to this patch
18:12:06 <rkukura> I’ll give it a try later today if possible
18:12:10 <SumitNaiksatam> yeah
18:12:39 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: now the patch posted seems to account for that change, but when we installed using devstack we saw that the first time around, we could not get horizon to load the js files without running that command
18:12:48 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: however i have not tried the latest patchset from ank
18:12:57 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Packaging
18:13:16 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks for following up with the RHEL packaging team
18:13:24 <SumitNaiksatam> any udates you want to provide here?
18:13:55 <rkukura> Nothing other than that. I did see our packages are in the RDO kilo repo, but not in RDO liberty.
18:14:37 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay, so they got automatically picked up in Kilo?
18:14:41 <rkukura> We’ll want to update the kilo packages to the latest, as well as get them into liberty and master.
18:14:55 <rkukura> I don’t think this was automatic, but need to find out.
18:15:12 <rkukura> I don’t think they are being CIed by delorean yet either.
18:15:59 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay, yeah I need to tag another stable release
18:16:30 <rkukura> yes, before we actually update anything, but I’m trying to figure out what we’ll need to do
18:16:46 <SumitNaiksatam> talking to some folks in the team, some more changes were anticipated, hence this keeps getting delayed
18:16:51 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yeah sounds good
18:16:59 <rkukura> Main question is whether we will need our master to be based on neutron/horizon/heat master to get into delorean
18:18:04 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay, we do plan to do that soon, but its not clear how long it will take, since i have not investigated yet
18:18:17 <rkukura> ok
18:18:37 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks for the update
18:18:45 <rkukura> np
18:18:47 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Design Specs
18:19:13 <SumitNaiksatam> Initial support for Quality of Service - #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275358/
18:19:21 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: there?
18:19:50 <SumitNaiksatam> perhaps not
18:20:16 <SumitNaiksatam> i put some basic questions on the spec
18:20:28 <SumitNaiksatam> as review comments
18:20:45 <SumitNaiksatam> was hoping to have some discussion today
18:21:05 <SumitNaiksatam> the other spec: Network Service Framework for GBP - #link https://review.openstack.org/239743
18:21:09 <SumitNaiksatam> is also not updated
18:21:41 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanth just pinged me offline that he plans to do it today and unfortunately could not do it time for today’s meeeting (and is currently offline)
18:22:14 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: any thoughts on either of this?
18:22:19 <SumitNaiksatam> *these
18:22:39 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: I have not reviewed either in detail yet, but plan to ASAP.
18:22:53 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: the QoS one is pretty short for now
18:23:05 <rkukura> yes, just glanced at it
18:23:23 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: my undertstanding is that the network service framework one is going to have some changes, so better to wait to wait for the next patchset
18:23:53 <rkukura> ok
18:24:19 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
18:24:43 <SumitNaiksatam> #info GBP Gerrit Query links
18:24:52 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/GerritQueries
18:25:08 <rkukura> Any ideas why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260786/ fails to verify?
18:25:12 <SumitNaiksatam> just posted these a couple of days back (should have done it long before)
18:25:33 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: the “remove version from setup.cfg” patches have not still merged
18:25:47 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: hence that patch (and others) are failing
18:25:58 <rkukura> didn’t realize there was a dependency
18:26:05 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: my posting the above link was in response to that :-)
18:26:29 <SumitNaiksatam> i was hoping at least having the quick link will make it easy for folks to recognize the pending patches
18:26:49 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: the dependency is because we had new releases in those projects
18:27:06 <SumitNaiksatam> and the patches which are failing to merge are the first ones after the releases were made
18:27:54 <SumitNaiksatam> earlier we used to update the branch with new version numbers
18:28:04 <SumitNaiksatam> but that is not needed if we remove them altogether
18:28:10 <rkukura> OK
18:28:48 <rkukura> The error looked like it had to do with the pbr version, but I guess its pbr complaining about the project’s version
18:28:50 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks for reviewing those patches
18:28:56 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: exactly
18:29:25 <rkukura> so we still need another core to +2/+A the setup.cfg patches
18:29:39 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yeah
18:30:21 <SumitNaiksatam> anything else we need to discuss today?
18:30:44 <rkukura> anything on summit proposals? Do we know when voting starts?
18:30:53 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ah thanks for reminding
18:31:21 <SumitNaiksatam> we have made one submission for a hands-on lab (as we discussed online)
18:31:33 <SumitNaiksatam> voting starts next week i believe
18:32:58 <SumitNaiksatam> we will revisit this in the next meeting with voting links
18:33:08 <rkukura> ok
18:33:09 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: anything at your end?
18:33:26 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: not at the moment ;)
18:33:35 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: sure :-)
18:33:45 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: tbachman: thanks for joining
18:33:56 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: np!
18:34:00 <SumitNaiksatam> bye!
18:34:01 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: thanks for chairing!
18:34:03 <rkukura> bye
18:34:12 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting