18:03:11 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:03:13 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Mar  3 18:03:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:03:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:03:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:03:26 <SumitNaiksatam> #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#March_3rd.2C_2016
18:03:41 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Bugs
18:04:25 <SumitNaiksatam> I did not see any critical issues, but there was one significant one reported by magesh yesterday #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552176
18:04:26 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1552176 in Group Based Policy "GBP Plumbing - Gateway port attached to a VM does not get IP through DHCP" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Magesh GV (magesh-gv)
18:04:55 <SumitNaiksatam> i havent seem a patch but i am guessing he is working on it
18:05:24 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ivar-lazzaro: any other critical bug on your radar that needs immediate attention?
18:05:44 <ivar-lazzaro> nope
18:05:51 <rkukura> no
18:05:58 <SumitNaiksatam> ok
18:06:03 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Testing
18:06:25 <SumitNaiksatam> i noticed that the stable/liberty and stable/kilo UTs were breaking last night
18:06:45 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: just saw your email on that
18:06:54 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yeah, was just going to say
18:07:08 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: whenever you get a chance can you take a quick look?
18:07:56 <rkukura> looks like mainly/only APIC failures, right
18:08:01 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yeah
18:08:04 <SumitNaiksatam> File "/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-group-based-policy-python27/.tox/py27/src/python-opflexagent-agent/opflexagent/type_opflex.py", line 80, in get_mtu
18:08:04 <SumitNaiksatam> if physical_network in self.physnet_mtus:
18:08:05 <SumitNaiksatam> AttributeError: 'OpflexTypeDriver' object has no attribute 'physnet_mtus'
18:08:08 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: hi
18:08:15 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: hello
18:08:48 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: wanted to follow up if magesh is working on #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552176
18:08:49 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1552176 in Group Based Policy "GBP Plumbing - Gateway port attached to a VM does not get IP through DHCP" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Magesh GV (magesh-gv)
18:09:32 <ivar-lazzaro> SumitNaiksatam: ok will give a look
18:09:38 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: thanks
18:09:44 <songole> I will check with him today.
18:09:53 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: thanks, he assigned it to himself
18:09:59 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Packaging
18:10:18 <SumitNaiksatam> on the mitaka sync front we merged all the patches across the repos
18:10:24 <SumitNaiksatam> thanks all for reviewing
18:10:26 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: Nice!
18:10:59 <SumitNaiksatam> some UI issues cropped up but we were able to post the fixes within the sync patches themselves
18:11:08 <SumitNaiksatam> thanks to Ank from songole’s team
18:11:47 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: as before i did not do any more stable releases since the feeling was that patches were still coming in
18:12:06 <rkukura> not sure they’ll ever stop ;)
18:12:14 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: lol!
18:12:39 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: anything you wanted to discuss at your end?
18:12:43 <rkukura> I have been trying to get an update on the RDO/delorean stuff from apevec @ Red Hat, but no luck
18:12:51 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ah ok
18:13:09 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: being synced with mitaka now, we should be in reasonable shape, right?
18:13:13 <rkukura> I’ll keep trying, and want to let him know if can be turned on for master now as well
18:13:18 <rkukura> I think so
18:13:23 <rkukura> We’ll need to keep it working
18:13:27 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: right :-)
18:14:06 <SumitNaiksatam> the sanity branches are being rebased on a daily basis, so we will catch things at least in a day’s window
18:14:06 <rkukura> I don’t think Fedora packaging is relevant any more, but will see what else needs to be done to update RDO/CentOS packages
18:14:13 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay
18:14:27 <rkukura> We’ll eventually want to deal with puppet/packstack/director integration
18:14:42 <rkukura> that’s it from me
18:14:43 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ah, thats significant work
18:14:47 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks
18:15:09 <SumitNaiksatam> oh btw, the mitaka devstack has also been updated
18:15:11 <rkukura> I’m hoping some of the work being done around APIC will be reusable for the ref impl as well
18:15:22 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: that would be nice
18:15:51 <igordcard_> hi
18:15:55 <SumitNaiksatam> so by installing the devstack from the master here: #link https://github.com/group-policy/gbp-devstack/tree/master
18:16:16 <SumitNaiksatam> you should be able to get GBP mitaka with the rest of OpenStack Mitaka
18:16:19 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: hi there
18:17:09 <SumitNaiksatam> at some point the goal is to move all of this into a devstack plugin, but that hasnt happened yet
18:17:26 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Design Specs
18:17:39 <SumitNaiksatam> Qos Support #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275358/
18:17:51 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: any updates at your end?
18:17:52 <igordcard_> I couldn't update the spec to be "reviewable"
18:17:59 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: okay np
18:18:14 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: question for you (and for the rest of the team as well)
18:18:15 <igordcard_> will do it today though
18:18:34 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: you mentioned that you wanted to initially experiment with this approach (using NSP)
18:18:46 <SumitNaiksatam> would you prefer to work on a feature branch for this?
18:18:59 <igordcard_> SumitNaiksatam: yes I was planning to update it to reflect that initial PoC
18:19:17 <igordcard_> and move the reamining ideas to the alternatives section
18:19:41 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: okay, i can create a feature branch from the current master that will be dedicated for your work
18:19:57 <SumitNaiksatam> the only overhead is that we will have to keep syncing the feature branch from the master
18:20:22 <SumitNaiksatam> but this is standard practice
18:20:32 <igordcard_> SumitNaiksatam: hmm, okay, cool... will NSP suffer many changes soon?
18:20:52 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: i dont think anything changes in the API/model any time soon
18:21:21 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: most of the work that i know is being planned either on the policy driver’s side or related to NFP
18:21:43 <igordcard_> okay
18:21:55 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard_: so for the work that you are doing, i think you can expect stablility for the near future
18:22:11 <igordcard_> SumitNaiksatam: nice :)
18:22:37 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: we had a good chat with the team in person last week
18:22:49 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: i believe hemanth will update the spec
18:23:20 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: Yes, hemanth will be posting a new patch today.
18:23:21 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: any other updates at your end or any design discussion you want to have today?
18:23:55 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: implementation is progressing. I don't see any design issues at this time.
18:24:12 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: okay
18:24:27 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: any other follow up from the discussion last week?
18:24:34 <SumitNaiksatam> regarding the “workers” patch?
18:24:50 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/282292
18:25:20 <songole> We looked at taskflow. Adopting it at this time would be quite some change.
18:26:10 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: okay, is it a matter of change or a matter of suitability?
18:26:25 <songole> it is both.
18:26:30 <SumitNaiksatam> okay
18:27:07 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: what about the persistent queue part?
18:28:17 <songole> We like to submit the patches first and then look at redis queue as an option.
18:28:25 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: okay
18:28:43 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
18:29:19 <SumitNaiksatam> i believe the speaker sessions for austin will be announced over the next few days
18:29:42 <SumitNaiksatam> did anyone get any notification yet?
18:30:08 <rkukura> I have not, but heard 3rd hand that someone else did
18:30:36 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ah okay
18:30:58 <SumitNaiksatam> anything else for today?
18:31:28 <SumitNaiksatam> alrighty, thanks all for joining!
18:31:34 <SumitNaiksatam> see ya next week!
18:31:36 <SumitNaiksatam> bye!
18:31:38 <songole> bye
18:31:41 <rkukura> thanks SumitNaiksatam!
18:31:46 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting