18:00:44 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:00:45 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Apr 21 18:00:44 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:00:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:01:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#April_21st.2C_2016
18:01:30 <SumitNaiksatam> a note upfront on the mitaka release
18:01:59 <SumitNaiksatam> we had a rc1 release and i found some issues with our in-tree devstack
18:02:04 <SumitNaiksatam> that has been fixed since
18:02:43 <SumitNaiksatam> other than that i am just waiting to merge the devref patch from igordcard once its complete
18:03:25 <SumitNaiksatam> is there anything else anyone else wants to land any critical fix?
18:04:09 <SumitNaiksatam> okay
18:04:25 <SumitNaiksatam> so please note that we have to moved to non-date based version numbering
18:04:50 <SumitNaiksatam> since we are in the 4th release, the RC tag was
18:04:59 <SumitNaiksatam> and the release version will be 4.0.0
18:05:30 <tbachman> 4 for juno/kilo/liberty/ and now Mitaka?
18:05:37 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: right
18:05:43 * tbachman can count :)
18:05:50 <tbachman> lol
18:05:59 <SumitNaiksatam> basically following the convention used by other projects when they switched from date versioning
18:06:10 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: thx
18:06:26 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: does that sound okay based on your interaction with the RHEL packaging team?
18:06:59 <rkukura> I think so, but the epoch will need to be incremented
18:07:17 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: can you elaborate?
18:07:48 <rkukura> The epoch is basically an invisible most significant part of the version number
18:08:09 <rkukura> Since 4 < 2015, we will need to bump the epoch
18:08:35 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay, where is that captured?
18:08:38 <rkukura> which will mean 4.x supercedes 2015.x
18:08:49 <rkukura> Its in the spec file for the RPM
18:08:54 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: i though this is somehow handled in pbr
18:09:16 <rkukura> PBR may have something similar, but I don’t know much about PBR
18:09:17 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: ah okay, that makes sense, since i did not see anything in the code tree itself
18:09:24 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: hemanthravi: hi
18:09:27 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks
18:09:35 <hemanthravi> hi
18:09:42 <rkukura> It seems what we are doing is just like what all other projects have done, so I’m confident it will work out
18:09:59 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yes, to the best of my understanding
18:10:05 <SumitNaiksatam> i would hope to release mitaka by the end of this week
18:10:16 <ivar-lazzaro> hi
18:10:21 <SumitNaiksatam> so let me know offline if there are any concerns
18:10:24 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: hi
18:10:26 <songole> Hi
18:10:40 <SumitNaiksatam> moving on
18:11:24 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: i am assuming there no more packaging updates or things to discuss immediately?
18:12:01 <rkukura> no update for now
18:12:17 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: okay
18:12:20 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Docs
18:12:45 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard’s devref patch has been up for review: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306855
18:12:49 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: there?
18:14:23 <SumitNaiksatam> i wanted to check with igordcard when he plans to remove the patch from WIP
18:14:33 <SumitNaiksatam> i believe only the pep8 needs to be fixed
18:14:46 <SumitNaiksatam> any major concerns with this patch?
18:16:22 <SumitNaiksatam> if not, then we can look at merging this patch once its out of WIP
18:16:47 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic NFP Design Spec
18:17:00 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/239743
18:17:09 <SumitNaiksatam> i see there are +2s on this
18:17:33 <SumitNaiksatam> i need to give one more reading, but i am mostly fine with this
18:17:45 <hemanthravi> addressed so far
18:17:52 <hemanthravi> the comments so far
18:18:12 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: thanks for your patience on this spec, its dragged on for close to six months now
18:18:35 <SumitNaiksatam> anyone else have any major concerns?
18:19:13 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: my understanding is that the implementation patches will have a devref docment which reflects the state of implementation as a followup to this design spec
18:19:40 <hemanthravi> SumitNaiksatam: will work on the deverf patches
18:19:48 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: thanks
18:20:00 <hemanthravi> the implementation patches are posted
18:20:07 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: right
18:20:20 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: the devref needs to be part of the implementation patch
18:20:28 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: perhaps in the last patch of the chain
18:20:50 <hemanthravi> if there are no major concerns can this spec be +A'd. I can continue to address any comments that come up
18:20:52 <SumitNaiksatam> so i guess no more comments on the NFP spec
18:21:26 <SumitNaiksatam> hemanthravi: yeah i would propose that discussion move to the implementation patches and the devref therein
18:21:51 <SumitNaiksatam> the spec was meant to facilitate the design discussion to this point
18:22:25 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
18:23:08 <SumitNaiksatam> amit bose has been reviewing the APIC policy driver related patches and has been doing a great job
18:23:24 <SumitNaiksatam> so we have added him as +2/A core for the APIC patches
18:24:14 <SumitNaiksatam> i dont see amit here right now, but welcome Amit!
18:24:50 <SumitNaiksatam> programming note - we dont have the IRC meeting next week since we will be at the OpenStack Austin Summit
18:25:31 <SumitNaiksatam> most of us will be at the workshop #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/6894/developing-deploying-and-consuming-l4-7-network-services-in-an-openstack-cloud
18:25:36 <SumitNaiksatam> please attend if you get a chance
18:25:45 <SumitNaiksatam> anything else for today?
18:25:54 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: Are any in-person GBP design sessions planned?
18:26:31 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: not yet, but we play it by the ear once we get there
18:26:35 <rkukura> ok
18:26:43 <SumitNaiksatam> *we can
18:27:20 <SumitNaiksatam> alright thanks all for attending today, and see you at the Summit next week!
18:27:23 <SumitNaiksatam> bye!
18:27:35 <rkukura> bye
18:27:39 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting