18:00:46 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:00:47 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 16 18:00:46 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:48 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:00:50 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:01:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#Feb_16th.2C_9th_2017
18:01:22 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: firstly, a warm welcome to you ;-)
18:01:35 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: and thanks for posting the patch
18:01:39 <tbachman> hi annak!
18:01:45 * tbachman welcomes annak
18:01:47 <annak> thank you! glad to join
18:01:49 <SumitNaiksatam> folks, annak is the newest member to the team
18:01:53 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: hi
18:01:57 <rkukura> hi
18:02:18 <SumitNaiksatam> was waiting to see if songole is joining
18:02:43 <SumitNaiksatam> wanted to discuss the NFP gate job
18:03:05 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic NFP gate job failures
18:03:21 <SumitNaiksatam> so this patch is being worked for the past week
18:03:23 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431350
18:03:31 <SumitNaiksatam> thanks to ash
18:03:41 <SumitNaiksatam> seems like it passed the check gate yesterday
18:03:57 <SumitNaiksatam> but it failed the merge gate, and on recheck all jobs are failing
18:04:26 <SumitNaiksatam> i just noticed this, so there might be something else going on in the gate, but havent had a chance to study the logs
18:04:47 <SumitNaiksatam> the reason i wanted to discuss this first is because the QoS patch disucssion depends on this
18:05:10 <SumitNaiksatam> and I wanted the team to understand what changes are being done to fix the NFP failing gate job
18:05:47 <SumitNaiksatam> for the benefit, to reiterate, our merge gate only checks for doc, py27 and pep8 jobs
18:06:06 <SumitNaiksatam> however on the reviews we do gate on the other three devstack jobs
18:06:21 <SumitNaiksatam> the NFP and rally jobs had been failing for a while and we had to discount them
18:06:35 <SumitNaiksatam> i have since fixed the rally job, and looks like the NFP job is close to getting fixed
18:07:00 <SumitNaiksatam> since songole and ash are not here, let me move on to the next topic
18:07:11 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic QoS via NSPs
18:07:16 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426436
18:07:28 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: thanks for joining at your late hour
18:07:46 <SumitNaiksatam> so as i understand the only blocker here is the NFP gate job, right?
18:08:15 <SumitNaiksatam> would any additional changes be needed for your patch, apart from rebase?
18:09:29 <SumitNaiksatam> i thought i saw igordcard earlier, but seems he is not around too :-)
18:09:58 <SumitNaiksatam> i will sync up with him offline (along with OSM and ash)
18:10:12 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Application Policy Group (APG)
18:10:29 * tbachman look at ground, kicks rock
18:10:46 * tbachman averts eyes
18:10:54 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: no worries :-)
18:10:57 <tbachman> lol
18:11:08 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: I’ll have a look at it… proably sometime tomorrow tho
18:11:10 <SumitNaiksatam> so yeah, there are few patches on this
18:11:13 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: thanks
18:11:27 <SumitNaiksatam> we had discussed the spec earlier, #link #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339272/
18:11:46 <SumitNaiksatam> and the impl patches: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430616, and
18:12:18 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434148/ <— this one is WIP but is close
18:12:43 <SumitNaiksatam> any discussion we want have on this today?
18:13:12 <SumitNaiksatam> i will have to post CLI and Heat patches once we are done with these, but need a nod from you guys on these first
18:14:24 <SumitNaiksatam> seems like we havet had enough to look through these yet :-)
18:14:30 <SumitNaiksatam> so moving on
18:14:50 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
18:15:22 <annak> I have a q about gbpclient if I may
18:15:29 <SumitNaiksatam> i have to get back to the newton sync, was hoping to quickly wrap up the APG stuff, but its taken longer than imagined
18:15:36 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: sure
18:16:23 <annak> i'm trying to align it with newton and was wondering if there's a reason why gbp client doesn't inherit from neutron.ClientBase
18:16:53 <annak> it seems to solve the newton sync problems
18:17:37 * igordcard arrived
18:17:54 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: ah okay, i would have to go back and look, its been a while since we did it that way, the best i remember is that we had to override some stuff which was not easy to do with the inheritence
18:18:01 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: but if you have it working thats great
18:18:14 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: welcome :-)
18:18:39 <annak> SumitNaiksatam: thanks I'll post this
18:18:56 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: so i was asking earlier, any additional changes be needed for your patch, apart from rebase? (after the NFP job patch merges)
18:19:04 <SumitNaiksatam> annak: yes please, will take a look
18:19:06 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: looks like songole is here now :)
18:19:11 <songole> Hello
18:19:19 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: hi there
18:19:23 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: thanks :-)
18:19:30 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: sorry, i am late
18:19:32 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: np!
18:19:49 <igordcard> was chatting to ash, he mentioned a failure of the QoS patch, but since the there were no failures with the patch that has been workflowed+1 today, I'm not sure if it is still failing
18:20:08 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: okay
18:20:15 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: np, was asking earlier, wanted the team to understand at a high level what changes we made to NFP job to fix it?
18:20:17 <igordcard> so as soon as it merges, I'll test QoS with it and fix anything that might be incorrect
18:20:33 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: okay, i will investigate why it failed in the merge gate
18:20:44 <SumitNaiksatam> and now in the check gate
18:20:55 <igordcard> SumitNaiksatam: I've no specific info regarding NFP or the gates atm
18:21:12 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: sure, np, checking with songole now
18:21:18 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: Ash identified a few issues
18:21:30 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: yes, i saw them in the commit message
18:21:41 <songole> - VM is not getting IP. dhcp issues
18:21:50 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: but have we removed some scenarios, since its running much faster/shorter now
18:22:08 <SumitNaiksatam> (i like it this way)
18:22:14 <songole> no, it was timing out before
18:22:26 <songole> hence taking longer
18:22:39 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: oh, if that was the only reason, and we have managed to preserve all the scenarios, thats awesome
18:22:51 <SumitNaiksatam> because i saw it finish in less than hour
18:23:01 <SumitNaiksatam> and earlier it used to always be more than that
18:23:02 <songole> - there was also some bug with polling timeout interval and port security
18:23:21 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: okay
18:23:34 <songole> it didn't merge however.. build failed
18:23:44 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: yes, i will investigate
18:23:57 <SumitNaiksatam> others feel free to investigate as well
18:24:03 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: ok. thanks
18:24:23 <SumitNaiksatam> for now i will just recheck, might be a transient issue (my wishful thinking!)
18:24:39 <SumitNaiksatam> anyone else have anything else for today?
18:25:47 <SumitNaiksatam> for future meetings, if you need something to be discussed please feel free to update the meeting agenda directly here: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy
18:26:15 <SumitNaiksatam> i dont have anything else for today, so i gues we will wrap up, get back some time :-)
18:26:19 <SumitNaiksatam> thanks all for joining
18:26:22 <SumitNaiksatam> bye!
18:26:32 <annak> bye!
18:26:38 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting