18:04:31 #startmeeting networking_policy 18:04:32 Meeting started Thu Mar 2 18:04:31 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:04:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:04:35 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy' 18:04:54 #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#March_2nd_2017 18:05:16 #topic Newton Sync 18:05:19 #link https://review.openstack.org/426437 18:05:33 the above is not done yet, but i am down to one issue 18:05:38 at least in the UTs 18:06:02 taking much longer than i had planned 18:06:29 quite a few things had changed, especially with respect to session handling, transactions, db objects, etc 18:06:58 rkukura: i think you did a quick review on one of the earlier patches 18:07:15 SumitNaiksatam: I had a couple comments/questions on patch set 18. Some of these no longer apply, but some might. 18:07:18 i read your comments, havent responded because i was fixing some of them 18:07:26 yeah 18:07:27 figured that 18:07:30 just saying that 18:07:41 i will cook up a detailed commit message 18:07:51 ok 18:07:51 that will explain all that needed to be done, and the pending items 18:08:11 annak is already working on at least a couple of the items 18:08:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439247 <— this is the db migration for using project_id 18:08:45 annak: thanks for promptly posting the above 18:09:11 she has also posted a client patch: #link https://review.openstack.org/435155 18:09:37 no problem. I'm not sure it covers all and was wondering if UTs will give enough confidence 18:10:01 annak: per plan, after i finish fixing this last UT issue, i will incorporate the client patch into the devstack integration test on the server side (currently all integration jobs are noop in the newton sync patch) 18:10:11 annak: yes sure, i will take a look 18:10:37 annak: if you dont mind i might make changes to that patch directly and post patchsets if its a quick thing 18:10:50 sure, feel free 18:10:57 annak: thanks 18:11:05 so I take it we aren’t ready to merge this one yet? 18:11:20 rkukura: no, nothing is tested with the integration tests 18:11:45 that means the devstack also needs to be fixed, painful! 18:12:28 anyway, this happens every time, so need to suck it up! 18:13:13 so to the extent anyone got a chance to look at the newton sync patch, i just wanted to bring it up here if any clarifications are needed 18:13:21 rkukura: annak: as before thanks for taking a look 18:13:37 no problem 18:14:28 also, per ongoing convention with GBP, we will try to merge these patches as soon as we have reasonable confidence, and cut stable/newton, after that we continue to backport anything that is considered necessary 18:15:13 but it will be good to have the stable/newton at the earliest so that packages can be built 18:15:38 btw, heat and horizon will also need to be fixed 18:15:39 SumitNaiksatam: I've run some devstack tests with all 3 patches above neutron and basic stuff works (with some devstack settings commented out) 18:15:56 annak: oh wow, nice! 18:16:35 annak: thanks for trying that, i might reach out to you then in case the devstack fails 18:16:43 sure 18:16:47 i mean if i run into issues with the conf 18:16:58 annak: so you used the GBP devstack plugin? 18:17:52 SumitNaiksatam: not sure what you mean :) I was running with vmware plugin as core plugin 18:17:58 sure 18:18:07 i was checking if you used this: 18:18:08 https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/tree/master/devstack 18:18:26 to configure the GBP part 18:19:06 probably, i think this is what happens when you run devstack and enable gbp plugin, right? 18:19:23 annak: right 18:19:48 annak: so did you change anything after that? 18:19:51 sorry i'm new to openstack so occasional stupid questions are expected :) 18:20:24 yes, i disabled a few services - all heat-related stuff and a few more, i can send you the list 18:20:26 annak: you can’t take away my title of “king of the stupid question” ;) 18:20:27 annak: no, not at all 18:20:46 tbachman: common on! :-) 18:20:53 * tbachman is a pro at playing dumb :P 18:20:59 tbachman: :-) 18:21:12 :) 18:21:15 annak: that would be great 18:21:37 ok, will do 18:21:44 is igordcard around? 18:21:51 #topic QoS 18:21:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/426436 18:22:15 unfortunately i didnt get a chance to follow up after igordcard’s latest comments 18:22:31 i think the NFP tests are still failing, and igordcard had a clue as to why 18:22:45 i would still like to get this merged before we cut stable/networn 18:22:51 *newton 18:22:59 i will try to sync up with him offline 18:23:06 #topic Open Discussion 18:23:35 rkukura: any reflections from the Atlanta PTG relevant to this meeting or our project? 18:23:45 i believe you met garyk 18:23:59 yes, spoke with garyk a bit 18:24:44 he had a call planned with annak and we were going to followup after that, but did not get to it 18:25:10 rkukura: sure, i think annak is making great progress in a very short time 18:25:20 absolutely 18:25:30 wow thanks :) nice to hear 18:25:46 and without much help, i should add 18:25:48 sounded like garyk had the same impression 18:26:39 i think the sooner we can get stable/newton done, the faster we can move to working on features again 18:26:53 this activity is holding everything else back 18:27:04 thats on me! :-( 18:27:34 alrighty, if nothing else, we can wrap up for today 18:27:43 nothing else from me 18:27:59 nor from me 18:28:05 we have a bunch of NFP patches which i was hoping to discuss but i dont think any of the authors are here 18:28:09 so offline and next time 18:28:16 thanks rkukura annak tbachman 18:28:18 SumitNaiksatam: thanks! 18:28:23 bye all! 18:28:26 #endmeeting