18:01:46 #startmeeting networking_policy 18:01:47 Meeting started Thu Aug 17 18:01:46 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:01:51 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy' 18:02:26 just wanted to go over the pending reviews quickly 18:03:23 just +2/A’ed a couple of adit’s patched 18:03:40 great, thanks for that 18:03:53 tbachman is not joining today 18:04:02 annak: np 18:04:23 i am not sure this #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491894/ is ready yet 18:05:00 similarly this one #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491874/ 18:05:09 rkukura: do you know if any of them are ready? 18:05:44 the aim job failed on the former, so i was a bit unsure (might be a transient thing) 18:05:47 was wondering the same thing 18:06:18 and the last time tbachman mentioned that he was still experimenting with that patch on a live system 18:06:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/469681 18:06:51 annak: any more discussion we need on the above? 18:07:16 not at the moment, I hope to finalize it soon 18:07:20 based on the emails 18:07:32 annak: yes sure, thanks much 18:07:51 there are a couple of UI patches #link https://review.openstack.org/493830 and #link https://review.openstack.org/493617 18:08:05 i will take a look, also if anyone else wants to take a look 18:08:37 #topic Open Discussion 18:08:51 annak: rkukura anything else you wanted to bring up? 18:09:04 not today 18:09:22 the nsx job is still shaky, please disregard it still 18:09:44 annak: ok np, it seemed like it was getting close though :-) 18:09:54 i see a lot of the log artifacts 18:09:59 yes, hopefully 18:10:08 there are some exceptions i see which i actually see in the aim logs as well 18:10:14 i had meant to get to the bottom of those 18:10:30 i dont think those are seen with the other resouce_mapping driver 18:10:50 which ones do you mean? 18:11:03 i had seen these exceptions on the nsx job a couple of days back so it might have changed 18:11:16 the exceptions did not seem to be breaking functionality 18:12:04 the patch you approved should fix some of nsx-related ones 18:12:04 on the latest patch i see #link http://207.189.188.190/logs/neutron/494101/1/gate-group-based-policy-nsx/logs/q-svc.log.txt.gz?level=ERROR 18:12:20 some are obviously nsx specific 18:12:33 but there were some others which were exactly what i was seeing the aim job as well 18:12:51 i have to go back and check with the aim job 18:13:24 anyway 18:13:25 yes, the root cause is fixed, but I was intending to take a look at the exception recovery as well 18:13:33 annak: ah okay 18:14:14 alright, thanks rkukura and annak for joining 18:14:16 SumitNaiksatam: Any update on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483137/ ? 18:14:29 rkukura: yeah my bad 18:14:32 i need to fix it 18:14:50 the UTs are broken becaue heat code was refactored 18:14:54 i havent fixed it 18:15:12 i am still working on #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489163/ 18:15:34 and another issue with amqp/rabbit that we saw on a production setup 18:16:03 ok 18:16:11 once #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489163/ is working, it can be used with any driver 18:16:31 i got it to work in devstack setup 18:16:44 but ran into issues on a real deployment 18:17:27 thanks again, we will continue over emails, see you back here next week! 18:17:31 bye 18:17:34 bye 18:17:35 #endmeeting