18:05:00 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:05:01 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb  8 18:05:00 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:05:02 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:05:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:05:18 <SumitNaiksatam> not much of an agenda from me today
18:05:33 <SumitNaiksatam> perhaps just the talk submission?
18:05:39 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: did you submit it?
18:05:51 <annakk> not yet
18:06:02 <annakk> planning after the meeting?
18:06:07 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: sure
18:06:17 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: tbachman: your thoughts on the email thread?
18:06:27 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: looks good!
18:06:50 <annakk> just sent a update
18:06:51 <rkukura> I have a couple minor suggestions
18:06:59 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: thanks
18:07:05 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: sure
18:07:34 <rkukura> One would be to mention that there is a generic solution along with the NSX and ACI solutions
18:07:59 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: oh yeah of course, very good point
18:08:03 <SumitNaiksatam> taken for granted :-)
18:08:29 <rkukura> it might make more sense to say “several years” instead of “several cycles”
18:09:04 <SumitNaiksatam> i agree
18:09:17 <rkukura> makes it sound more mature
18:09:23 <annakk> ok :)
18:09:40 <SumitNaiksatam> agree
18:10:10 <rkukura> last is that I’m wondering if we should make any mention of discussing GBPs status within OpenStack, or if we are better off ignoring that
18:10:40 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: my feeling is that we are better of ignoring that since at this point we dont have any concrete to state
18:10:41 <annakk> I don't know.. it might draw attention
18:10:51 <SumitNaiksatam> i believe the abstract can be slighlty altered if accepted
18:11:06 <SumitNaiksatam> so if things change, we might have a chance to do that a little bit later as well
18:11:19 <annakk> that's good to know
18:11:24 <SumitNaiksatam> any -> anything
18:11:51 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: in the past you could update your abstract, and also swap authors/presenters
18:12:08 <SumitNaiksatam> of course not substatially/materially change the talk itself :-)
18:12:23 <SumitNaiksatam> i wanted to throw “materially” there
18:12:33 <annakk> but if GBP supports IoT by then we'll be able to include it :)
18:12:34 <rkukura> if we could come up with some very subtle way to refer to “becoming official” within the roadmap, it might help
18:12:36 <SumitNaiksatam> been hearing a lot of legal speak on TV for the past days :-)
18:13:03 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: i think we would be
18:13:08 <rkukura> I’m a bit concerned about reviewers of the abstract dismissing GBP because it is not an official project, so mentioning that might make it more relevant to them
18:13:33 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: although if you have plans to do that, you can perhaps mention that is something that is in the works?
18:13:55 <annakk> SumitNaiksatam: I thought it was a joke, but who knows :)
18:14:17 <rkukura> IoT and ML
18:14:23 <tbachman> Blockchain
18:14:29 <SumitNaiksatam> and i was just typing that you should be committed to doing it :-)
18:14:30 <annakk> service mash!
18:14:33 <tbachman> lol
18:14:44 <tbachman> we need to rename our project
18:14:46 <annakk> blockchain was in syndey summit btw
18:14:56 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: +1
18:14:58 <tbachman> lol
18:15:22 <SumitNaiksatam> “service meshed block chain of internet of things”
18:15:27 <tbachman> GroupBasedPolicyContainerizedBlockchainwithSmartContractsServiceMeshing
18:15:32 <annakk> :)
18:15:32 <SumitNaiksatam> there you go
18:15:32 <tbachman> Oh, left off IoT
18:16:22 <SumitNaiksatam> we can wrap early if nothing more to discuss
18:16:22 <tbachman> we are the networking analog of self-driving marketing
18:16:28 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: thanks for working on the abstract
18:16:34 <tbachman> annakk: yeah, huge thanks!
18:16:41 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: lol
18:16:47 <rkukura> did we decide on which authors to list?
18:17:04 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: did you decide ^^^ ?
18:17:37 <annakk> no, but Sumit suggests Gary should be there as an openstack dinasour
18:17:41 <annakk> and Sumit
18:17:52 <tbachman> heh
18:17:58 <tbachman> “Sage"
18:17:59 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: lol, thanks for attributing that to me :-)
18:18:04 <SumitNaiksatam> i hope gary is not listening
18:18:07 <annakk> :)
18:18:28 * tbachman tabs for auto-complete on gar
18:18:45 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: me doing the same
18:18:51 <SumitNaiksatam> there are bunch of them :-)
18:18:52 <rkukura> hey - I was interviewed gary for his 1st OpenStack job
18:19:05 <rkukura> s/I was interviewed/I interviewed/
18:19:07 <annakk> oh! then s/gary/rkukura
18:19:10 <tbachman> rkukura: are you trying to claim the throne?
18:19:17 <SumitNaiksatam> annakk: rotfl
18:19:20 <rkukura> closest to extinct?
18:19:23 <tbachman> lol
18:19:39 <tbachman> “elder statesman"
18:19:52 <SumitNaiksatam> my involvement in openstack/neutron preceedes all of you
18:19:56 <SumitNaiksatam> i should get out of here
18:19:58 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam, annakk, and garyk probably makes most sense
18:19:59 <SumitNaiksatam> for sure
18:19:59 <tbachman> lol
18:20:11 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: you may be right
18:20:30 <SumitNaiksatam> i think we can swap the authors later
18:20:32 <rkukura> I started during the week of the essex summit
18:20:59 <SumitNaiksatam> i started in cactus/diablo
18:21:15 <SumitNaiksatam> should not have mentioned that!
18:21:23 <rkukura> tricked you
18:21:39 <SumitNaiksatam> yeah, you got me
18:21:44 <tbachman> pre-quantum even
18:21:53 <SumitNaiksatam> nova-networking days
18:21:56 <tbachman> lol
18:22:17 <SumitNaiksatam> anyway, annakk please feel free to ping us on the email thread if you need further help
18:22:33 <annakk> ok, sure
18:22:38 <tbachman> just a quick question — has anyone recently tried building top-of-tree master with a clean setup?
18:22:53 <SumitNaiksatam> you mean UTs?
18:22:54 * tbachman is getting a weird problem with tox
18:22:55 <tbachman> yeah
18:23:07 <tbachman> Cloning https://github.com/noironetworks/python-opflex-agent.git (to master) to ./.tox/py27/src/python-opflexagent-agent
18:23:08 <tbachman> fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/noironetworks/python-opflex-agent.git/': Could not resolve host: github.com
18:23:08 <tbachman> Command "git clone -q https://github.com/noironetworks/python-opflex-agent.git /home/vagrant/work/openstack/upstream/group-based-policy/.tox/py27/src/python-opflexagent-agent" failed with error code 128 in None
18:23:09 <rkukura> I ran tox last night with current master plus my current branch
18:23:09 <SumitNaiksatam> let me fire off in the upstream test patch
18:23:19 <tbachman> need to clear out .tox, etc.
18:23:32 <tbachman> I can do it from a command line by itself
18:23:35 <tbachman> which is what’s weird
18:23:39 <rkukura> yes, I had to clear out .tox because of changes in AIM
18:23:44 <tbachman> k
18:24:08 <tbachman> will have to go figure this one out
18:24:23 <SumitNaiksatam> just rebased the test patch, lets see
18:24:31 <rkukura> actually, I may be seeing issues
18:24:37 <SumitNaiksatam> oh
18:24:53 <rkukura> two AIM UTs had failed, thought it was timeouts, but need to investigate
18:25:14 <SumitNaiksatam> its possible that AIM might have broken us
18:25:19 <SumitNaiksatam> its happened in the past :-(
18:25:40 <SumitNaiksatam> wont jump to conclusions though
18:25:50 <SumitNaiksatam> lets watch the upstream test patch as well
18:25:59 <SumitNaiksatam> alrighty, thanks all
18:26:09 <SumitNaiksatam> bye until next week!
18:26:13 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: bye!
18:26:14 <rkukura> I had rerun the AIM UTs, and now 5 failed :(
18:26:15 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting