15:00:58 #startmeeting neutron_ci 15:00:58 Meeting started Tue Aug 23 15:00:58 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:58 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ci' 15:01:00 o/ 15:01:01 o/ 15:01:11 o/ 15:01:16 Grafana dashboard: https://grafana.opendev.org/d/f913631585/neutron-failure-rate?orgId=1 15:01:39 ralonsoh: ykarel ping 15:01:43 bcafarel: 15:01:56 sorry, hi 15:02:02 hi 15:02:17 o/ sorry 15:02:22 no problem :) 15:02:29 I think we can start 15:02:32 #topic Actions from previous meetings 15:02:41 slaweq to fix functiona/fullstack failures on centos 9 stream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1976323 15:02:48 I got back to it today 15:03:10 and I still have no idea why 2 functional tests related to the deletion of conntrack entires are failing 15:03:50 on centos 9 stream there is libnetfilter_conntrack-1.0.8-4.el9.x86_64 and with this version tests are failing 15:04:17 but when I downgraded it to libnetfilter_conntrack-1.0.6-5.el8.x86_64 tests are passing 15:04:47 any error in syslog? 15:04:53 or in neutron 15:05:12 from what I found, with version 1.0.8 we got -1 in https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/privileged/agent/linux/netlink_lib.py#L200 15:06:01 ralonsoh: no any other errors 15:06:19 slaweq, I'll ping you later 15:06:32 ralonsoh: thx, we can talk about it offline tomorrow morning 15:07:05 in the meantime I will assign same action for me for this week 15:07:10 #action slaweq to fix functiona/fullstack failures on centos 9 stream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1976323 15:07:14 ok, next one 15:07:27 ralonsoh to check route not found failure in functional job https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_9a3/852723/2/check/neutron-functional-with-uwsgi/9a30d07/testr_results.html 15:07:37 yeah, still fighting with this one, sorry 15:07:44 no problem 15:07:55 do You want to assign it for You for this week? 15:08:23 sure 15:08:36 #action ralonsoh to check route not found failure in functional job https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_9a3/852723/2/check/neutron-functional-with-uwsgi/9a30d07/testr_results.html 15:08:38 thx 15:08:46 ok, next one 15:08:47 slaweq to check failing neutron-ovn-tempest-ovs-master-centos-9-stream periodic job 15:08:57 I also got to this today 15:09:19 for now I proposed devstack patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/854190 15:09:40 and I'm waiting for results of that job with this change 15:09:55 I think it will move forward a bit but there will be other changes needed as well probably 15:10:04 when that started to happen? 15:10:32 ralonsoh: I don't really know 15:10:49 I will also assign it to me for this week and will continue work on fixes 15:10:57 #action slaweq to check failing neutron-ovn-tempest-ovs-master-centos-9-stream periodic job 15:11:42 and that was last Action Item for today 15:11:44 #topic Stable branches 15:11:57 lajoskatona: bcafarel: anything new with stable branches? 15:12:17 From me only what I mentioned on the team meeting 15:12:17 not a lot on my side, backports on >=train are merging fine 15:13:04 I checked stein failures and as I see we can skip grenade as that is experimenta lfrom QA teams perspective on these branches 15:13:49 +1 and backports in these branches should not have upgrade impacts 15:13:58 and the linuxbridge tempest job is failing and I know what is the problem but can't figure out what to say in zuul cfg to have the good result (disable q-log or disable neutron-log) 15:14:19 lajoskatona: You can try to disable both :) 15:14:22 lajoskatona: use uppercase to yell at zuul? :) 15:14:31 :-) 15:14:56 ok, I will push not wip patch for it 15:15:13 lajoskatona: please send me link to patch, I will take a look :) 15:15:48 slaweq: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/853794 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/853608 15:16:28 ok, I will look at it tomorrow 15:17:34 I think we can move on 15:17:40 +1 15:17:51 yep (and thanks lajoskatona for working on these) 15:18:32 #topic Stadium projects 15:18:44 any updates regarding stadium ? 15:19:07 I have one small thing forthe weekly jobs 15:19:31 the bgpvpn job is failing but as I see only because the required project list is empty 15:19:50 no sorry it is bagpipe: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/854003 15:21:07 otherwise I don't know of any issues for stadiums 15:22:51 thx for update lajoskatona 15:22:58 I just approved that patch 15:23:13 #topic Grafana 15:23:46 in grafana things looks pretty good 15:24:01 except that today many jobs are going to very high failure rates 15:24:33 but also, there is very few runs of the jobs so maybe it was just one or 2 runs which failed and that's why percentage are high 15:24:59 yeah, I think so 15:25:08 because when I was checking recent patches, I didn't notice today any major issue with our gates 15:26:34 I think we can move on 15:26:38 to the next topic 15:26:42 #topic Rechecks 15:27:05 +---------+----------+... (full message at https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/VBdFagQCTXlesqxdQgkdHVzg) 15:27:19 average number of rechecks to get patch merge is pretty good still 15:27:44 and regarding bare rechecks in last 7 days: 15:27:45 +---------+---------------+--------------+-------------------+... (full message at https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/fYoqUJzwSUDwuRESBqExPdYb) 15:27:53 it is also much better 15:27:57 thank You all :) 15:28:16 \o/ 15:28:52 anything You want to add there? 15:28:56 Cool! 15:29:46 ok, lets move on 15:29:51 #topic Periodic 15:30:11 here I just wanted to say thanks to ralonsoh as openstack-tox-py39-with-oslo-master is fixed now :) 15:30:35 cool 15:31:05 other than that, only broken job is the one with centos-9 stream but we talked about it already earlier today 15:31:06 +1 thanks 15:31:08 Thanks ralonsoh 15:31:26 and I have nothing more for today's meeting 15:31:44 so if You don't have any other topics related to CI, we can finish meeting earlier 15:31:45 I like the trend of "not a lot to say on CI" meetings 15:31:51 :) 15:32:17 :-) 15:32:39 ok, so lets have few minutes back :) 15:32:46 :) 15:32:47 thx for attending the meeting 15:32:50 \o/ 15:32:51 and see You online 15:32:52 o/ 15:32:52 o/ 15:32:53 bye! 15:32:55 #endmeeting