15:30:22 #startmeeting neutron-drivers 15:30:23 Meeting started Wed Jul 1 15:30:22 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:26 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers' 15:30:27 dougwig is here 15:30:39 amotoki carl_baldwin kevinbenton: Yo! 15:30:44 * mestery pokes armax as well if he wants to listen in 15:30:46 * carl_baldwin here 15:30:57 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers Agenda 15:31:12 Lets see if we can keep this short, all in favor of that? 15:31:16 #topic Specific Specs 15:31:16 second 15:31:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/196803 Really Get Me a Network 15:31:39 So, it turns out we didn't satisfy jay and monty's requests 15:31:43 Thus, I think we need this one 15:31:53 And we need to do the backend-API work to really create or use existing resources 15:31:59 * mestery lets folks digest this 15:33:03 * carl_baldwin needs to read 15:33:09 :) 15:33:34 #action neutron-drivers to review "Really Get Me a Network" update 15:33:41 Next up 15:33:47 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196812/ Segmented, L3-only networks 15:33:54 carl_baldwin: This is your spec, and the meat of our meeting today :) 15:33:59 I should say, devref, not spec 15:34:06 that spec really comes down to the ages old neutron/nova-net issue of do we keep trying to tell people what they *really* want (get me a network) 15:34:25 Yes, I thought I’d start small and get consensus there before adding to it. 15:34:40 dougwig: Yup 15:34:43 carl_baldwin: Makes sense to me 15:35:25 carl_baldwin: I like the idea of starting small here, and I like the idea of L3-only networks 15:36:12 I see there are comments from kevinbenton that I need to digest 15:36:20 carl_baldwin: Also regXboi :) 15:36:55 Most of kevinbenton ’s comment look fine. Will go read the comment from regXboi again. 15:36:59 #action neutron-drivers to review "Segmented, L3-only networks" 15:37:01 thanks carl_baldwin 15:37:18 #topic Open Discussion 15:37:28 #action mestery to move this meeting to a time when kevinbenton can attend and when everyone else is awake 15:37:39 Promise to do it next week 15:37:48 Anything else or should we go back heads down? ;) 15:38:59 * carl_baldwin has nothing more 15:39:23 are there any new RFE's to sort through? 15:39:57 dougwig: Looking 15:40:14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1370033 15:40:14 Launchpad bug 1370033 in neutron "Admin should be able to manually select the active instance of a HA router" [Medium,New] - Assigned to yong sheng gong (gongysh) 15:41:13 I think a slim spec to document the API change for that one should be ok 15:41:17 I've commented in the bug itself. 15:42:21 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1468803 15:42:21 Launchpad bug 1468803 in neutron "Modular L2 Agent" [Undecided,New] 15:43:13 i'm not sure i need to see a spec on 033. 15:43:33 Because the API change is so small? 15:43:41 803 likely needs to be encouraged to start at spec/devref, to build consensus if nothing else. 15:43:54 dougwig: Comment in there for 803 15:43:56 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1468493 15:43:56 Launchpad bug 1468493 in neutron "Unify Open vSwitch and Linux Bridge agent configuration file sections/options" [Undecided,New] 15:43:56 aye. it's not a huge loss if the code review doesn't work on that api change. 15:44:29 493 LGTM 15:44:31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1468236 15:44:31 Launchpad bug 1468236 in neutron "enable neutron support distributed DHCP agents" [Undecided,New] 15:44:34 can we broaden 493 to be "why do we have 93,467 config files for neutron? have you people never heard of [sections]?" 15:44:45 :) 15:45:22 Seems like a separte spec 15:45:24 *separate 15:45:33 236 seems reasonable as well 15:45:48 Our first contentious one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1468366 15:45:48 Launchpad bug 1468366 in neutron "RFE - Packet logging API for Neutron" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Yushiro FURUKAWA (y-furukawa-2) 15:47:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1469322 15:47:06 Launchpad bug 1469322 in neutron "Associating a floatingip with a dual stack port requires the fixed-address to be specified" [Undecided,New] 15:47:37 i'm not sure packet tracing should go through syslog... 15:48:07 +1 15:48:10 agreed 15:48:11 322 seems like a no brainer 15:48:13 lets get it in 15:48:46 And finally: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1469668 15:48:46 Launchpad bug 1469668 in neutron "Add a neutron port-scheduler component" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Kevin Benton (kevinbenton) 15:48:46 +1 15:49:41 I've marked all of them confirmed at this point since we've at least acknowledged them. 15:49:55 i trust kevin to run with 668 15:49:57 Please review them and if you want to approve them, move them to triaged and leave a comment 15:50:10 dougwig: Move it to triaged then and note he can move forward 15:50:18 mestery: ok 15:50:24 dougwig: Also give it a priority, maybe high? 15:50:41 OK, anything else before we close? 15:50:43 mestery: sorry for being late, but i did have more comments on "really get me a network", will just add them to the comments 15:50:51 haleyb: Thanks sir! 15:52:00 OK, thanks folks! 15:52:01 #endmeeting