14:00:20 <mlavalle> #startmeeting neutron_drivers
14:00:21 <openstack> Meeting started Fri Apr 13 14:00:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'
14:00:54 <mlavalle> Hi there
14:01:02 <haleyb> hi
14:01:34 <mlavalle> yamamoto is travelling this week, so we'll wait for amotoki to complete quorum
14:02:33 <amotoki> hi
14:02:54 <mlavalle> ok, we have quorum now
14:03:03 <mlavalle> Let's dive right in
14:03:03 <amotoki> I cannot join a meeting next week
14:03:19 <mlavalle> amotoki: this meeting?
14:03:33 <amotoki> mlavalle: no, it's about next week
14:03:48 <amotoki> just an announcement
14:03:48 <mlavalle> amotoki: I know, this meeting next week
14:03:55 <mlavalle> ?
14:04:14 <amotoki> ah... I see.
14:04:23 <amotoki> this meeting next week
14:04:45 <amotoki> ah I should use 'the' instead of 'a meeting' :p
14:05:21 <mlavalle> thanks for the heads up
14:05:34 <mlavalle> so first one to discuss today is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743480
14:05:34 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1743480 in neutron "[RFE] No way to differentiate beween floating IP networks and external provider networks" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
14:06:30 <mlavalle> we discussed two weeks ago. We concluded that it was confusion on the part of the submitter about the meaning of the network attributes
14:06:51 <mlavalle> We decided to give him some more time to provide feedback
14:07:07 <amotoki> he added some comments since then
14:07:15 <mlavalle> yeah, he did
14:08:06 <amotoki> he seems to misunderstand that floating IP networks need to be queried by "shared=False and external=True" but "external=True" is the right one.
14:08:22 <mlavalle> he commented back that "This needs to be discoverable via the api", which I think it is
14:08:58 <mlavalle> the "external=True" attribute is part of the API
14:09:12 <amotoki> that's my understanding.
14:09:46 <amotoki> the confusion comes from relationship around 'shared' and 'router:external'
14:10:10 <amotoki> i think we can reject this RFE and we should improve our API reference.
14:10:15 <mlavalle> My proposal is that I will leave a comment indicating that it is indeed discoverable through the API and close this RFE
14:10:49 <mlavalle> amotoki: I think we are in agreement
14:11:02 <mlavalle> haleyb: what do you think?
14:11:32 <haleyb> i agree with you two
14:11:57 <mlavalle> cool. I'll leave comments at the end of the meeting
14:12:00 <mlavalle> let's move on
14:12:29 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1748132
14:12:29 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1748132 in neutron "[RFE] Can not create router gateway without external_fixed_ips" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Guoshuai Li (liguoshuai1990)
14:13:33 <mlavalle> on this one we were leaning towards approving the submitter's original proposal, but amotoki wanted to leave a comment
14:14:26 * mlavalle wonders how amotoki does this "Notice" thing
14:14:54 <amotoki> IIRC my point is that this proposal works but it is up to users.
14:15:16 <amotoki> in my IRC client limechat, Ctrl-Enter allows me to send a notice
14:15:40 <amotoki> the proposal does not help operators save public IP addresses.
14:18:47 <mlavalle> are you planning to leave a comment explaining your point?
14:19:29 <amotoki> mlavalle: I just added a comment.
14:20:15 <mlavalle> amotoki: perfect, thanks!
14:20:20 * haleyb also wonders how this works with ovn, since that was in his last comment, but will wait for a response to the new question
14:20:53 <mlavalle> ++
14:21:05 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1754123
14:21:05 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1754123 in neutron "[RFE] Support filter with floating IP address substring" [Wishlist,Incomplete]
14:21:10 <amotoki> haleyb: this is the API behavior, so I think it is independent to backends.
14:22:20 <haleyb> amotoki: ok, i thought his second question was about snat
14:22:38 <haleyb> but then i guess that would happen with ml2/ovs as well
14:23:00 <amotoki> haleyb: i think so too
14:23:22 <haleyb> i'm fine waiting for a response
14:24:28 <mlavalle> REading this last ^^^ RFE, it seems it is not needed anymore
14:25:19 <amotoki> mlavalle: agree
14:25:41 <amotoki> perhaps his original request said too many.
14:25:45 <mlavalle> so I am removing the RFE tags from it and leave it marked as incomplete
14:25:51 <mlavalle> I will leave a comment also
14:25:55 <mlavalle> hang on.....
14:26:14 <amotoki> mlavalle: +1
14:28:23 <mlavalle> done
14:28:33 <mlavalle> Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1756705
14:28:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1756705 in neutron "RFE: New Neutron extension for binding levels" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Evgeny Fedoruk (evgenyf)
14:31:18 <mlavalle> Here's the associated patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554508/
14:31:19 <patchbot> patch 554508 - neutron-lib - Port binding levels extension presented
14:31:29 <amotoki> it is still unclear to me. what I am not sure is the reporter would like to switch LBaaS behavior depending on HPB.
14:31:57 <amotoki> I would like to know more concrete use case in his mind.
14:32:40 <amotoki> if a use case is reasonable, I have no objection to export port binding level details in API.
14:33:12 <mlavalle> That sound reasonable. I will leave a comment and see what his response is
14:34:24 <mlavalle> and those are all the RFEs we have for today's meeting
14:34:50 <mlavalle> I am planning to go back to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1715386
14:34:50 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1715386 in neutron "[RFE]Support routing traffic based on subnet" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6)
14:35:07 <mlavalle> and read the latest revision of the spec
14:35:22 <mlavalle> Maybe others can also provide some feedback
14:36:21 <mlavalle> any other topics we should discuss today?
14:37:58 <amotoki> we have 48 rfe-approved RFEs. we might need to check their status some time.
14:38:30 <mlavalle> that's a very good point
14:38:41 <mlavalle> I will do that this coming week
14:39:02 <mlavalle> at least I will start going through them and see what the status is
14:39:19 <mlavalle> feel free to pitch in, though :-)
14:40:04 <amotoki> thanks. I will try to look through specs next week
14:40:46 <mlavalle> I will report next week on findings about the approved RFEs
14:42:02 <mlavalle> ok, thanks for attending. See you guys next week
14:42:11 <amotoki> thanks
14:42:19 <mlavalle> #endmeeting