14:00:46 #startmeeting neutron_drivers 14:00:47 Meeting started Fri Feb 22 14:00:46 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:50 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers' 14:00:52 o/ 14:00:54 hi 14:00:56 o/ 14:01:09 How are you all? 14:01:16 hi 14:01:22 great :) 14:01:34 slept through the alarm, so just woke up ;-) 14:01:53 hi 14:02:28 everybody is here 14:02:33 so let's get rolling 14:02:38 #topic RFEs 14:03:15 First up is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1817119 14:03:16 Launchpad bug 1817119 in neutron "[rfe] add rbac for security groups" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Doug Wiegley (dougwig) 14:03:41 The description is sparse... but there are patches for it already 14:04:28 here's the proposed doc: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/635311/13/doc/source/admin/config-rbac.rst 14:06:39 for me it's completly fine - I just asked dougwig to fill rfe to have everything done right from this procedural side :) 14:06:54 yeap, thanks for that 14:07:07 what I really like about this is that it takes one of the things fwaas tried to achieve and realizes it in core neutron 14:07:21 in a simple and straightforward way 14:07:27 I warned him last night I was bringing it up today in the meeting, in case there were questions 14:07:28 generally it makes sense. on the ohter hand, it reminds me of fwaas-v2. what do you think about it? 14:07:50 njohnston already mentioned the similar point :) 14:08:11 whether this should be implemented in fwaas-2? 14:08:40 well, it's less complicated than how fwaas v2 does things, and as we know customer uptake of fwaas is very limited. I personally think it is smart to pull this in to core neutron 14:09:04 I believe it is worth discussed 14:09:48 I am okay to support RBAC in security groups API in neutron because both RBAC and SG exist in neutron and it does not change the SG behavior model. 14:10:12 I don't want this to become a "what is the future of fwaas" but fwaas is in sort of a special position because it was built to compete with a core neutron function - security groups. Both fwaas and security groups have evolved over the years, grown and enhanced over time. I see this as an extension of that. 14:10:17 the other consideration is that I don't know how much manpower we have left in fwaas 14:10:25 mlavalle: +1 14:11:08 exactly, and sg aren't deprecated or something like that so I don't see any reason why we should not accept new feature for it 14:11:25 the truth is that here we have a cocnrete proposal, that in my opinion makes sense without breaking anything and we have the body to implement it 14:11:39 mlavalle++ 14:11:42 I second this 14:11:48 mlavalle++ 14:11:52 makes sense to me too, and dougwig's been great at getting stuff done and fixing things lately too 14:11:58 +1 14:12:24 ok, approved by ovation 14:12:35 * mlavalle updating the RFE 14:12:38 :) 14:14:18 Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815933 14:14:19 Launchpad bug 1815933 in neutron "[RFE] Allow bulk-tagging of resources" [Wishlist,New] 14:14:29 we discussed this one last week 14:14:55 amotoki: did you have a chance to send message to ML? 14:15:05 sorry, I failed to find time to send it to the ML due to busy week.... 14:15:15 no problem 14:15:37 if you lack bandwidth, I can start the thread 14:15:43 just let me know 14:16:01 mlavalle: thanks. I am writing a draft now, so I will take care of it. 14:16:12 amotoki: thank you very much! 14:17:33 That's it for today's RFEs 14:17:42 #topic On demand agenda 14:18:11 ralonsoh added a topic to the agenda in regards https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815345 14:18:13 Launchpad bug 1815345 in neutron "neutron doesnt delete port binding level when deleting an inactive port binding" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Adrian Chiris (adrian.chiris) 14:19:13 I don't think it is necessary to discuss it here, but I would encourage the team to comment in the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634276/ 14:19:31 which I intend to do later today 14:19:53 ok 14:20:28 anything else we should discuss today? 14:20:45 nothing from me 14:20:54 me neither 14:21:18 not from me 14:21:19 ok, amotoki, yamamoto and slaweq, you can go and enjoy your weekends 14:21:39 njohnston, haleyb and I have to toil a little longer 14:21:45 mlavalle: thx :) have a great weekend 14:21:53 have a great weekend all! 14:22:08 #endmeeting